- Volume 17 Issue 7
DOI QR Code
A Comparison of Two Kinds of Markers Applied in Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Sheep and Goat Populations
- Yang, Z.P. (Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University) ;
- Chang, H. (Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University) ;
- Sun, W. (Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University) ;
- Gen, R.Q. (Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University) ;
- Mao, Y.J. (Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University) ;
- Tsunoda, K. (Showa University School of Medicine)
- Received : 2003.04.29
- Accepted : 2004.03.16
- Published : 2004.07.01
A genetic examination using 14 structural loci and 7 microsatellite markers was carried out among random samples of Hu sheep (Hu), Tong sheep (Tong) and Yantse River Delta White goat (YRD); The mean heterozygosity (H), mean polymorphism information contents (PIC) and mean effective numbers of alleles (Ne) calculated based on the data from the above two types of genetic markers were compared. The standard genetic distances among the three populations based on two types of gene frequencies were calculated and compared. The results show that the mean heterozygosity (H), mean polymorphism information contents (PIC) and mean effective numbers of alleles (Ne) based on 7 microsatellite markers are greater than those based on the structural loci. The standard genetic distances based on structural loci among the three populations are: 0.0268-0.2487, the standard genetic distances based on microsatellite markers are: 0.2321-1.2313. The study indicates that structural and microsatellite markers reflect the genetic variation of the three populations consistently: Tong>Hu>YRD. The differentiation between related species or interpopulations can be expressed more effectively by microsatellite markers than structural markers. Oar FCB11, MAF33, Oar AE101, Oar FCB128 and OarFCB304 can be used as representative loci for research on genetic differentiation between sheep and goat.
Structural Loci;Microsatellite Marker;Mean Heterozygosity;Standard Genetic Distance;Genetic Differentiation
- Hunter, R. and C. Markert. 1957. Histochemical demonstration of enzymes separated by zone electrophoresis starch gels. Sci. 125:1294-1295.
- Nevo, E., A. Berles and R. Ben-shlomo. 1984. The evolutionary ignificance of genetic diversity: Ecological, demographic and life-history correlates. In: Mani. G. S. Evolutionary Dynamics of Genetic Diversity, pp. 13-213. Spriger-Verlag, Berlin.
- Quinn, T. W., J. S. Quinn, F. Cooke and B. N. White. 1987. DNA marker analysis detects multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of the lesser snow goose. Nature 326:392-394. https://doi.org/10.1038/326392a0
- Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucl. Acids. Res. 17:6463-6471.
- Xiong, Y. Z. 1999. The experiment conduction of porcine biochemical and molecular genetics, Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 1999, pp. 39-42.
- Tsunoda, K., K. Nozawa, Y. Madeda, Y. Tanabe, T. Tserenbation, M. Byamba, H. Tumennasan, T. Zanchiv and B. Dashnyam. 1999. External morphological characters and blood protein and non-protein polymorphisms of native sheep in central Mongolia, Rep. Soc. Res. Native livestock 17:63-82.
- Bostein, D., R. L. White and M. Skolnek. 1982. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Human Genetics 32:314-331.
- Yang, Z. P., H. Chang, W. Sun, R. Q. Geng and Y. J. Mao. 2002. Blood Protein Polymorphism and Phylogeny Status of Hu Sheep and Tong Sheep. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition). V23, No. 2:24-28.
- Cann, R. L., M. Stonking and A. C. Wilson. 1987. Mitochondria DNA and human evolution. Nature, 325:31-36.
- Lei, C. Q. 1999. Shanxi Tong sheep. The Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine 03:35-37.
- Kimura, M. and J. F. Crow. 1974. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 1974. 49:725-738.
- Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106:283-92.
- Barker, J. S. F., S. S. Moore, D. J. S. Hetzel, D. E. vans, S. G. Tan, K. Byrne. 1999. Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): microsatellite variation and a comparison with protein-coning loci. Animal Genetics 1997. 28:103-115.
- Williams, J. G. K., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA pdymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:6531-6535.
- Tsunoda, K., T. Okabayashi, Amano, K. Kuroki, T. Namikawa, T. Yamagate, Y. Yamamoto, V. T. Xun and C. B. Loc. 1998. Morphologic and genetic characteristics of sheep raised by the cham Tribe in Vietnam, Rep. Soc. Res. Native Livestock 16:63-73.
- Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-90.
- Geng, R. Q., H. Chang, Z. P. Yang, W. Sun, L. P. Wang, S. X. Lu, K. Tsunoda and Z. J. Ren. 2003. Study on Origin and Phylogeny Status of Hu Sheep. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. Vol 15(5):743-747.
- Li, X. M., Y. Z. Gong, S. H. Zhao, K. Li, Z. Z. Pen and S. K. Shi. 2000. DNA extraction from porcine blood lysed in pig farm. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition) 31(3):261-264.
- Sun, W., H. Chang, Z. P. Yang, R. Q. Geng, S. X. Lu, G. B. Chang, W. Xu, H. Y. Wang, Z. J. Ren and K. Tsunoda. 2002. Studies on the genetic relationships of sheep populations from east and south of central Asia. Asian-Aust. J. Animal. Sci. Vol 15(10):1398-1402.
- Analysis of genetic diversity among seven goat populations in the middle and lower valley of Yangtse River and southeast coastal regions in China vol.1, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-007-0054-3
- Study on polymorphisms of microsatellite DNA of six Chinese indigenous sheep and goat breeds vol.1, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-007-0078-8
- Genetic diversity among Sawakni, Berberi and Najdi sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia using microsatellites markers vol.16, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15785