Retentive Force of Dental Impression Tray According to Retention form

유지형태에 따른 치과 인상용 트레이의 유지력에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Min-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Kuk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Jeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 최민호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신동국 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김민정 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 동진근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2004.06.30

Abstract

This study was performed to measure the retentive force of dental impression tray according to retention form. The 9 resin beams($30{\times}60{\times}2.5mm$) were made of visible light-curing tray resin according to the surface texture, the size of hole and the number of rim. The resin block was fabricated in width 50mm, length 30mm, heght 40mm to maintain an even hydrocolloid impression material. The retentive force between the resin beam and hydrocolloid impression material was measured by Universal Testing Machine(Zwick Z020, Zwick Co., Germany). The results obtained in this study were as follows : 1. The retentive force of the resin beam with bilateral 4 rims, 2mm holes(9group) was highest(9.18kg), and the polishing resin beam(2group) was worst(4.85kg). 2. There was no significant difference between the polished the resin beam(2group) and the contrast resin beam(1group). 3. The retentive force of the rimmed resin beam was higher than the perforated resin beam. 4. The retentive force of the 2mm perforated resin beam(4group) was higher than the 3mm perforated resin beam(3group). 5. As increasing the number of rim increased the retentive force.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 보건복지부