Instructor Beliefs and Attitudes about English Medium Instruction: Report of Questionaire Study

공학 분야에서의 영어 강의(English Medium Instruction)에 대한 기초 연구

  • Kang So-Yeon (Yonsei Center for the Innovation of Englneering Education) ;
  • Park Hye-Son (University of South Carolina)
  • 강소연 (연세대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 박혜선 (University of South Carolina 언어학과)
  • Published : 2004.03.01

Abstract

The number of schools that implement English medium instruction (EMI) to improve students' English proficiency has been increasing. Despite the increasing popularity of EMI, little attention has been paid to evaluating the effectiveness of EMI and its impact on students and instructors. This study explores these issues, focused on the case of the College of Engineering at Y University. A survey questionnaire was administered to 19 engineering professors who offered EMI courses in the Fall of 2003. The survey results show that: 1) the professors perceive that students' low English proficiency is a large obstacle to successful implementation of EMI, and that pre-EMI language courses are needed to prepare students for EMI. 2)Though the professors expressed confidence in their English proficiency, they indicated that they felt quite a lot stressed at teaching EMI courses; hence, support of the school administration is needed to help faculty offering EMI courses. 3)To improve students' English proficiency, native-speaking language instructors are needed to provide feedback on students' written and spoken English.

Keywords

References

  1. 중앙일보(2003). 이공계 영어 강의 바람(2003년 9월 25일 E16면)
  2. Ashton, P.T., & Webb,R.B.(1986). Making a difference:Teacher's sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman
  3. Land. M. L.(1987). Vagueness and clarity. In M. Dunkin(Ed.). The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher educa-tion(pp.392-397) New York: Perga-mon
  4. Morrison. Keith and Lui. Icy (2000). Ideology, linguistic capital and the medium of instruction in Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 21 (6), 471-486
  5. Wilson. S. M,. Shuman. L. S., & Richert, A. R. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing:Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J, Calderhead(Ed.), Exploring teacher thinking(104-124). London:Cassell
  6. Paribakht. T. & Weche. M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J.Coady & T. Huckin (eds.). Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.174-200). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
  7. 강소연 박혜선(2004). 영어강의의 실태 및 효과에 대한 학생들의 지각성향에 관한 조사 연구. 연세교육연구. Vol. 17. No. 1
  8. Brophy. J. E.. & Evertson. C. M.(1981). Student characteristics and teaching. New York: Longman
  9. Hines. C. V.. Cruickshank. D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relation to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22. 87-99
  10. Klaassen, R. G. and De Graaff, E. (2001). Facing innovation:preparing lectures for English-medium instruction in a non-native context. European. Journal of Engineering Educa-tion. 26(3). 281-289
  11. 김종원(2004). Global Lecture on Global Product Design and Manufacturing. 창의적 공학교육워크샵 자료집. 한국공학교육학회. 37-52
  12. Bandura, A.(1986). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist. 28, 117-148
  13. 강소연,박혜선(2003). English as a Medium of Instruction for Engineering majors. 공학 교육 학술대회 자료집. 한국공학교육기술학회. 2003
  14. 전국경제인연합회(2002). 기업에서 본 한국교육의 문제점과 과제. 전국경제인 연합회
  15. Amon. U.(2001). English as a future language of teaching at German universities?: A Question of difficult consequences posed by the decline of German as a language of science. In U. Amon(ed.). The dominance of Enlish as a language of science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  16. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special educetion:Issues in assess-ment and pedagogy. Clevedon. Avon:Multilingual Matters
  17. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis:Issues and implica-tions. New York: Longman
  18. Swain. M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESOL Canada Journal, 6(1), 68-83
  19. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society : The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press
  20. Gass. S. (1999). Discussion:incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 21, 319-333
  21. 연세대학교 교육개발센터(2003). 영어강의,이렇게 하면 된다. 강의 Tips 제8호
  22. Krashen. S. D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press
  23. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence:Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley. MA: Newbury House