Comparison Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone Autograft and Achilles Tendon Allograft

이식건에 따른 관절경하 전방 십자 인대 재건술의 비교 -자가 골-슬개건-골과 동종 아킬레스건의 비교-

  • Seo, Joong-Bae (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Jung, Hong-Geun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Ho (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Park, Hee-Gon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoo, Moon-Jib (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Byun, Woo-Sup (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Hong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University)
  • 서중배 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 정홍근 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김명호 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 박희곤 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 유문집 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 변우섭 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이주홍 (단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of the arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction used by Bone-Patella tendon-Bone autograft and Achilles tendon allograft. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the results of patients who had been managed with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using different graft such as Bone-Patella tendon-Bone autograft and Achilles les tendon allograft. 60patients (average age, 33.5 years)were retrospectively evaluated. The one group(average age, 33.4 years) was 32 patient who had been managed with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Bone-Patella tendon-Bone autograft. The other group(average age, 32.1 years) was 28 patient who had been managed with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allograft. 2 groups were evaluated subjectively by Lysholm knee scoring scale and objectively by KT-2000 arthrometer. The follow-up period was more than a year(average, 18 month). An early rehabilitation protocol was instituted. Results: On Lysholm knee scoring scale, the final evaluation was nearly normal in all patients. We could not find statistical difference among the two groups by KT-2000TM arthrometer. Conclusion: The use of allografts may be an acceptable choice for ACL reconstruction.