Study on Types and Counterplans of Medical Accident Experienced by Dentists in Seoul(2004)

서울특별시 개원 치과의사의 의료사고 및 분쟁의 유형과 대책에 관한 연구(2004년)

  • Yoon, Jeong-Ah (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Jin-Kyu (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ahn, Hyoung-Joon (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Hoon (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Youl (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 윤정아 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 강진규 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 안형준 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 최종훈 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김종열 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

Dentistry had been considered to be a relatively safe zone from the risk of medical accidents for there are less number of emergency cases. However, in these days, the number of medical dispute is increasing that the dentists would not be able to overlook it as if it is none of their matters. Hence, researches on various medical accidents and analyses on related matters to seek proper management have been carried out recently, but the datas are not enough yet. This study analysed the actual conditions of medical accidents as well as disputes and the general awareness of dental practitioners in local clinics with the purpose of understanding the general situation and to suggest counterplan. The study was conducted by analysing 1,882 questionnaires collected from total of 3,684 dentists belonging to Seoul Dental Association and where Doctors and Hospitals Medical Malpractice Insurance for dentists is administered. The results were as follows: 1. 98.47% of the respondents doubted the risk of medical accident and dispute. 2. 27.42% of the respondents experienced medical dispute, and there was no significant difference between the rate of medical disputes and the resident training. 3. Among the cases of medical accidents, those related to the periodontal/operative treatment showed the highest rate of 20.50%, and that related to implant treatment was 6.17%. 4. 43.02% of the respondents explained about the treatment procedure before the treatment while 25.90% started the treatment without consent of the patients. 5. Medical dispute resulted from not having any explanation or consent of the patients were of 16.55%. 10.26% had difficulties in solving the problem for missing the medical records. 6. 49.73% responded to be capable of administering first aid treatment. Among them, 23.60% were equipped with accurate knowledge regarding the emergency care. 7. During medical dispute, 88.09% sought counsel from other dentists, and Local district dental association was found to be the most frequently asked group. 8. In cases of medical dispute, 5.26% of the respondents were asked to submit relevant data from customer protection organization, and among them, 75.61% acceded the demand sincerely. 9. After the settlement of the dispute, 83.63% recovered relatively stable state of mind. 10. 99.46% of the respondents felt the necessity of medical dispute management organization, and 78.58% responded that it was urgent. 11. 66.70% of the respondents joined Doctors and Hospitals Medical Malpractice Insurance, although they had not experienced medical dispute. However, 73.36% of the respondent were not aware of it, and 93.36% of the members were not aware of the procedure of the dispute settlement. 12. 79.0% of the respondents who joined the Doctors and Hospitals Medical Malpractice Insurance still felt confused when medical dispute occured, but relatively safer than before. 13. When medical dispute was settled through Doctors and Hospitals Medical Malpractice Insurance, 71.92% of the dentists were contented more than moderately, however, 35.16% of the patients were contented. 14. For complement of Doctors and Hospitals Medical Malpractice Insurance, 53.22% of the respondents felt that insurance company, dentist, and patient should all participate in bringing mutual agreement for quick settlement of the dispute. In addition, 29.08% of the respondents wanted insurance company to prevent patients from disturbing their practices. From the above results, improvement of the general awareness on increasing rate of medical disputes, and education as well as complementary measures for settlement of the disputes are required.

References

  1. 김종열. 의료분쟁과 대책, 건치 임상강좌 요약, 1997
  2. 문국진. 의료형태의 변화와 의료인과 환자의 대인관계. 대한법의학회지 1988;12(1):1-14
  3. 추호경. 의료과오론, 초판, 육문사, 1992
  4. Bucklin R. Informed consent; past, present, and future. Legal Medicine Annual 1975:210
  5. 전하은. 의사의 설명위반과 가정적 승낙, 재판과 판례 1995:210-211
  6. 우리나라 의료분쟁의 소송외적인 조정장치, 치과임상 1990;8:64-67
  7. Medicine and Law, Appendix B, Malpractice Insurance Crisis - The Forum. Section of Insurance, Negligence and Compensation Law, American Bar Association, Vol.11, Special Issue, January, 1976
  8. Zimmerly JG. Informed consent to clinical investication. Legal Medicine Annual 1973:17
  9. Ursu SC. Symposium on legal consideration, The Dental Clinics of North America, 26(2), W.B. Saunders Co., 1982
  10. 석희태. 의료과실의 판단기준, 판례월보 1987년 2월호 (통권 197호)
  11. Tejima N. Medical Malpractice Screening Panels in the U.S.A., J. Medical Law 1987;II:19
  12. 고현철. 의료사고와 국가의 책임 ; 의료사고에 관한 제문제, 재판자료 제27집, 초판, 법원행정처, 서울, 1985
  13. Cohen RJ. Malpractice, The Free Press, A Division of McMillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1st Ed., New York, 1979
  14. 김광우. 의료의 입장에서 본 병원의료분쟁의 예방과 대책. 1983년도 병원경영세미나요지, 대한병원협회 1983;63
  15. 신은주. 의료분쟁과 그 해결방안, 의료와 법률 1996;(1):15-21
  16. 의가연보고서 제2호, 의료사고가족연합회, 1
  17. 문국진. 의료사고 및 과실의 유책성에 관한 법의학적 고찰. 대한법의학회지1987;11(1):25-35
  18. Annas GJ. Avoiding malpractice suit through the use of informed consent. Legal Medicine Annual 1977;217
  19. 의료분쟁에 대한 방어벽 구축. 치과임상 1990;10:74-75
  20. Holder AR. Medical Malpractice Law, 2nd Ed., A Wiley Medical Publication, New York, 1978
  21. 송미라. 치과의료사고 예방 및 대처 방안, 2003
  22. 김종열 외. 치과법학 및 의료사고대책, 대한치과의사협회 법제위원회, 1992
  23. 의료분쟁시 의료소비자측의 실력행사, 치과임상 1990;8:60-63
  24. 김재홍. 서울시 개원치과의사의 의료사고 유형 및 대책에 관한 조사연구. 대한구강내과학회지 1997;23(2):157-191
  25. 이승우, 정성창, 김영구. 진료행위와 환자의 승인, 치과연구 1981;10:45-46
  26. 문국진. 우리나라 의료분쟁 처리의 법의학적 고찰. 대한법의학회지 1985;9
  27. 김종열. 치과임상에서의 의료사고예방 및 처치, 덴티북, 1993
  28. 김영구 외. 법치의학, 고문사, 1987
  29. 김민중. 의료계약, 사법행정 1991;1:44-45
  30. Norton ML. Ethics in medicine and law; Standards and conflicts. Legal Medicine Annual 1977;210
  31. Pollack BR. Handbook of Dental Jurisprudence and Risk Management, PSG Publishing Co. Inc., 1980
  32. 대한의학협회: 의료분쟁실태조사보고, 1981
  33. 선진국의 의료분쟁 대처방법. 치과임상 1990;(8):68-71
  34. 박승서. 법조계의 입장에서 본 병원의료분쟁의 예방과대책, 1983년도 병원경영세미나요지. 대한병원협회 1983:23
  35. 이영준. 민법총칙, 박영사, 1990
  36. 문국진. 의료사고와 국가의 책임. 대한법의학회지 1990; 14