Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microbial and Quality Changes during Storage of Raw Oyster Treated with High Hydrostatic Pressure

초고압 처리한 생굴의 저장 중 미생물수 및 품질 변화

  • Park, Whan-Jun (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University) ;
  • Jwa, Mi-Kyung (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University) ;
  • Hyun, Sun-Hee (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University) ;
  • Lim, Sang-Bin (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University) ;
  • Song, Dae-Jin (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University)
  • 박환준 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 좌미경 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 현선희 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 임상빈 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 송대진 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과)
  • Published : 2006.12.29

Abstract

Raw oysters were treated at $10^{\circ}C$ and $22^{\circ}C/350$ Mpa/15 min, and microbial counts and quality were measured during storage of 14 days at $10^{\circ}C$. Total viable cell count (TVCC) in untreated oyster increased greatly during storage from starting inoculum of $1.6\times10^2\;CFU/mL$, and reached to $5.6\times10^2\;CFU/mL$ after 4 days of storage. TVCC of the pressure-treated was about $10^1\;CFU/mL$ right after high hydrostatic pressure treatment and increased slowly during storage, and about $10^3\;CFU/mL$ even after 7 days of storage. Lactic acid bacteria count (LABC) in the untreated was increased greatly during storage from starting inoculum of $3.3\times10^3\;CFU/mL$ at 3 days of storage and $7.2\times10^4\;CFU/mL$ after 4 days of storage. LABC in the pressure-treated was detected only after 5 days of storage, and about $10^2\;CFU/mL$ after 8 days of storage. The pH of the untreated was 6.19 and decreased gradually during storage, and 5.83 after 4 days of storage. The pH of the pressure-treated showed little change during storage, and 6.07, 6.03 and 5.82 after storage of 4, 8 and 14 days, respectively. Volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) in the untreated was 16.8 mg%, and maintained almost constant until 1 day of storage, and then increased suddenly, and 30.1 mg% after 4 days of storage. VBN of the pressure-treated stayed unchanged during storage, and about 20 and 23 mg% even after 4 and 8 days of storage, respectively. Hunter $L^*,\;a^*\;and\;b^*$ values were increased until 2 days of storage and then showed no change during storage. Demerit score was the lowest in the thawed raw oyster, and then in the increasing order of the pressure-treated (4 day and 8 day storage) and the untreated (4 day storage).

Keywords

File

Download PDF

References

  1. Ministry of Maritime Affairs & Fisheries. 2004a. Fisheries Production Statistics. Vol 12, p 34-36
  2. Ministry of Maritime Affairs & Fisheries. 2004b. Annual Report of Exports & Imports of Fishery Products. p 28-29
  3. Linehan LG, O'Connor TP, Burnell G. 1999. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition and fatty acid profile of Pacific oyster. Food Chem 64: 211-214 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00144-7
  4. Hur SH, Lee HJ, Hong JH. 2002. Characterization of materials for retort processing in oyster porridge. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 31: 770-774 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.5.770
  5. Styles MF, Hoover DG, Farkas DF. 1991. Response of Listeria monocytogenes and Vibrio parahaemolyticus to high hydrostatic pressure. J Food Sci 56: 1404-1407 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb04784.x
  6. Berlin DL, Herson DS, Hicks DT, Hoover DG. 1999. Response of pathogenic Vibrio species to high hydrostatic pressure. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 2776-2780
  7. Ohshima T, Ushio H, Koizumi C. 1993. High pressure processing of fish and fish products. Trends Food Sci Technol 4: 370-375 https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(93)90019-7
  8. Lopez-Caballero ME, Perez-Mateos M, Montero P, Bonderias AJ. 2000. Oyster preservation by high-pressure treatment. J Food Protect 63: 196-201 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.2.196
  9. Patterson MF. 2005. A review: microbiology of pressure-treated foods. J Appl Microbiol 98: 1400-1409 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02564.x
  10. Park WJ, Jwa ML, Hyun SH, Lim S, Song DJ. 2006. High hydrostatic pressure sterilization of V. parahaemolyticus and E. coli in raw oyster. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 935-939 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.7.935
  11. Korea Foods Industry Association. 2002. Code of Food. p 630-632, 641
  12. Yang ST, Lee EH. 1972. Freshness of fish and shrimp during cold storage. Bull Pusan Fish Coll 12: 703-712
  13. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. 1984. Panel test (visual examination, sensory examination): standardized criteria on food and additives in Japan. Notification No. 370
  14. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC, USA
  15. Carlez A, Rosec JP, Richard N, Cheftel JC. 1994. Bacterial growth during chilled storage of pressure-treated minced meat. Lebensm-Wiss Technol 27: 48-54 https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1994.1011
  16. Smelt JPPM. 1998. Recent advances in the microbiology of high pressure processing. Trends Food Sci Technol 9: 152-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(98)00030-2
  17. Seyderhelm I, Boguslawski S, Michaelis G, Knorr D. 1996. Pressure induced inactivation of selected food enzymes. J Food Sci 61: 308-310 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14182.x
  18. He H, Adams RM, Farkas DF, Morrissey MT. 2002. Use of high-pressure processing for oyster shucking and shelf-life extension. J Food Sci 67: 640-645 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb10652.x
  19. Jay JJ. 1996. Modern Food Microbiology. 5th ed. Chapman Hall, New York. p 127
  20. Cruz-Romero M, Smiddy M, Hill C, Kerry JP, Kelly AL. 2004. Effects of high pressure treatment on physicochemical characteristics of fresh oysters. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 5: 161-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2004.01.002
  21. Zhang JZ. 2000. The use of pH and buffer intensity to quantify the carbon cycle in the ocean. Marine Chem 70: 121-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00024-4
  22. Park YH, Chang DS, Kim SB. 1994. Processing and Utilization of Fisheries. Hyungseul Publisher, Seoul. p 403
  23. Ledward DA. 1998. High-pressure processing of meat and fish. In Fresh Novel Foods by High-Pressure. Autio K, ed. Proceedings of VTT Symposium 186, Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland. p 165-175
  24. Lee KH, Choe WK, Pyeun JH, Kim MN. 1976. Discolorization of canned boiled oyster. Bull Kor Fish Soc 9: 111-119
  25. Nielsen J, Jessen K. 1997. New development in sensory analysis for fish and fishery products. In Seafood from Producer to Consumer Integrated Approach to Quality. Luten JB, Borresen T, Oehlenschlager J, eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam. p 537-547

Cited by

  1. Relationship of pH, Glycogen, Soluble Protein, and Turbidity between Freshness of Raw Oyster Crassostrea gigas vol.47, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2014.0495
  2. Effect of Heat Treatment on Biochemical Characteristics of Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas vol.48, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2015.0876
  3. Inhibitory Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatments on Histamine Production in Mackerel Scomber japonicus vol.46, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2013.0733
  4. Quality Characteristics of Canned Boiled Oyster Crassostrea gigas and Canned Boiled Oyster Crassostrea gigas Added with Chlorella Processed in Various Sterilization Conditions vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2016.0427
  5. Risk Assessment of Oyster Crassostrea gigas Processing Site For an HACCP System Model vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2016.0533
  6. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treatment on chemical and microbiological properties of Makgeolli vol.56, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-013-3003-2
  7. Effect of High Pressure Processing on Freshness of Meat Products vol.33, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2018.33.4.272