DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Marbling on Meat Quality Characteristics and Intramuscular Connective Tissue of Beef Longissimus Muscle

Li, Chunbao;Zhou, Guanghong;Xu, Xinglian;Zhang, Jingbo;Xu, Shuqin;Ji, Yanfeng

  • Received : 2006.01.26
  • Accepted : 2006.06.24
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the effects of marbling on meat quality characteristics and intramuscular connective tissue of beef longissimus muscle. Chemical determinations, histological and mechanical measurements were performed on the raw and cooked meat at d 4 postmortem. The results showed that crude fat, collagen, fiber diameter and maximum transition temperature of intramuscular connective tissue increased (p<0.05) with the increase of marbling score. The cooking losses, collagen solubility, WBSF and perimysial thickness decreased (p<0.05) with the increasing marbling. WBSF correlated (p<0.05) with moisture, crude fat, collagen, cooking losses, sarcomere length and perimysial thickness. The development of marbling results in the decline in cooking losses, the avoidance of sarcomere shortening, and the disorganization of the perimysia, which accounts for the improvement of beef tenderness.

Keywords

Marbling;Tenderness;Connective Tissue;Longissimus

References

  1. Brooks, J. C., J. B. Belew, D. B. Griffin, B. L. Gwartney, D. S. Hale, W. R Henning, D. D. Johnson, J. B. Morgan, F. C. Parrish, J. O Reagan and J. W. Savell. 2000. National beef tenderness survey-1998. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1852-1860
  2. Cooper, C. C., B. B. Breidenstein, R. G. Cassens, G. Evans and R. W. Bray. 1968. Influence of marbling and maturity muscle. II. Histological considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1542-1546 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2761542x
  3. Fiems, L. O., E. De Campeneere, S. De Smet, G. Van de Voorde, J. M. Vanacker and C. V. Boucque. 2000. Relationship between fat depots in carcasses of beef bulls and effect on meat color and tenderness. Meat Sci. 56:41-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00017-6
  4. Obuz, E., M. E. Dikeman, J. P Grobbel, J. W. Stephens and T. M. Loughin. 2004. Beef longissimus lumborum, biceps femoris, and deep pectoralis Warner-Bratzler shear force is affected differently by endpoint temperature, cooking method, and USDA quality grade. Meat Sci. 68:243-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.003
  5. Ozawa, S., T. Mitsuhashi, M. Mitsumoto, S. Matsumoto, N. Itoh, K. Itagaki, Y. Kohno and T. Dohgo. 2000. The characteristics of muscle fiber types of longissimus thoracis muscle and their influences on the quantity and quality of meat from Japanese Black steers. Meat Sci. 54:65-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00072-8
  6. Parrish, F. C., D. G. Olson, B. E. Miner and R. E. Rust. 1973. Effect of degree of marbling and internal temperature of doneness on beef rib steaks. J. Anim. Sci. 37:430-434 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1973.372430x
  7. Renand, G., B. Picard, C. Touraille, P. Berge and J. Lepetit. 2001. Relationship between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Sci. 59:49-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00051-1
  8. Riley, D. G., D. D. Johnson, C. C. Chase, R. L. West, S. W. Coleman, T. A. Olson and A. C. Hammond. 2005. Factors influencing tenderness in steaks from Brahman cattle. Meat Sci. 70:347-356 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.01.022
  9. Savell, J. W., R. E. Branson, H. R. Cross, D. M. Stiffler, J. W. Wise, D. B. Griffin and G. C. Smith. 1987. National consumer retail beef study: palatability evaluations of beef loin steaks that differed in marbling. J. Food Sci. 52:517-519 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06664.x
  10. Shackelford, S. D., T. L. Wheeler and M. Koohmaraie. 1997. Repeatability of tenderness measurements in beef round muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2411-2416
  11. Swanson, L. A., E. A. Kline and D. E. Goll. 1965. Variability of muscle fiber size in bovine longissimus dorsi. J. Anim. Sci. 24:97-101 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1965.24197x
  12. Von Seggern, D. D., C. R. Calkins, D. D. Johnson, J. E. Brickler, and B. L. Gwartney. 2005. Muscle profiling: characterizing the muscles of the beef chuck and round. Meat Sci. 71:39-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.010
  13. Bergman, I. and R. Loxley. 1963. Two improved and simplified methods for spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Analyt. Chem. 35:1961-1965 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60205a053
  14. McBee, J. L. and J. A. Wiles. 1967. Influence of marbling and carcass grade on the physical and chemical characteristics of beef. J. Anim. Sci. 26:701-704 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1967.264701x
  15. Nishimura, T., A. Hattori and K. Takahashi. 1999. Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese Black Cattle, effect of marbling on beef tenderization. J. Anim. Sci. 77:93-104
  16. McKenna, D. R., C. L. Lorenzen, K. D. Pollok, W. W. Morgan, W. L. Mies, J. J. Harris, R. Murphy, M. McAdams, D. S. Hale and J. W. Savell. 2004. Interrelationships of breed type, USDA quality grade, cooking method, and degree of doneness on consumer evaluations of beef in Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, USA. Meat Sci. 66:399-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00126-8
  17. Savell, J. W., S. L. Mueller and B. E. Baird. 2005. The chilling of carcasses. Meat Sci. 70:449-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.027
  18. Hill, F. 1966. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J. Food Sci. 31:161-166 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1966.tb00472.x
  19. Romans, J. R., H. J. Tuma and W. L. Tucker. 1965. Influence of carcass maturity and marbling on the physical and chemical characteristics of beef. I. Palatability, fiber diameter and proximate analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 24:681-685 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1965.243681x
  20. Flint, F. O. and K. Pickering. 1984. Demonstration of collagen in meat products by an improved picro-sirius red polarization method. Analyst. 109:1505-1508 https://doi.org/10.1039/an9840901505
  21. Jones, B. K. and J. D. Tatum. 1994. Predictors of beef tenderness among carcasses produced under commercial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1492-1501
  22. Light, N. and A. E. Champion. 1984. Characterization of muscle epimysium perimysium and endomysium collagens. Biochem. J. 219:1017-1026 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2191017
  23. Savell, J. W., H. R. Cross and G. C. Smith. 1986. Percentage ether extractable fat and moisture content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. J. Food Sci. 51:838-840 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13946.x
  24. China's Ministry of Agriculture (CMA). 2003. Beef quality grading (NY/T676-2003). China's Standard Publishing, Beijing, China
  25. Kim, C. J. and E. S. Lee. 2003. Effects of quality grade on the chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) beef. Meat Sci. 63:397-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00099-2
  26. Tatum, J. D., G. C. Smith and Z. L. Carpenter. 1982. Interrelationships between marbling, subcutaneous fat thickness and cooked beef palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 54:777- 784 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.544777x
  27. Hedrick, H. B., G. F. Krause, M. R. Ellersieck, R. J. Epley, J. C. Riley and G. B. Thompson. 1981. Beef carcass composition as influenced by yield and quality grade. J. Anim. Sci. 53:102- 106 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.531102x
  28. Janz, J. A. M., J. L. Aalhus, M. E. R. Dugan and M. A. Price. 2006. A mapping method for the description of Warner-Bratzler shear force gradients in beef longissimus thoracis et lumborum and semitendinosus. Meat Sci. 72:79-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.009
  29. Reuter, B. J., D. M. Wulf and R. J. Maddock. 2002. Mapping intramuscular tenderness variation in four major muscles of the beef round. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2594-2599
  30. USDA. 1997. United States standards for grades of carcass beef. Agriculture Marketing Service, USDA, Washington, DC
  31. Bratcher, C. L., D. D. Johnson, R. C. Littell and B. L. Gwartney. 2005. The effects of quality grade, aging, and location within muscle on Warner-Bratzler shear force in beef muscles of locomotion. Meat Sci. 70:279-284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.01.013
  32. Breidenstein, B. B., C. C. Cooper, R. G. Cassens, G. Evans and R. W. Bray. 1968. Influence of marbling and maturity on the palatability of beef muscle. I. Chemical and organoleptic considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1532-1541 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2761532x
  33. Luchak, G. L., R. K. Miller, K. E. Belk, D. S. Hale, S. A. Michaelsen, D. D. Johnson, R. L. West, F. W. Leak, H. R. Cross and J. W. Savell. 1998. Determination of sensory, chemical and cooking characteristics of retail beef cuts differing in intramuscular and external fat. Meat Sci. 50:55-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00016-3
  34. Cross, H. R., R. L. West and T. R. Dutson. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Sci. 5:261-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(81)90016-4
  35. Denoyelle, C. and E. Lebihan. 2004. Intramuscular variation in beef tenderness. Meat Sci. 66:241-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00097-4
  36. Jeremiah, L. E. 1996. The influence of subcutaneous fat thickness and marbling on beef. Palatability and consumer acceptability. Food Res. Int. 29:513-520 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(96)00049-X
  37. Fortin, A., W. M. Robertson and A. K. W. Tong. 2005. The eating quality of Canadian pork and its relationship with intramuscular fat. Meat Sci. 69:297-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.011
  38. Wheeler, T. L., L. V. Cundiff and R. M. Koch. 1994. Effects of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 72:3145-3515 https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72123145x

Cited by

  1. Alternative production systems for male Charolais cross-bred cattle using semi-natural grasslands vol.61, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.543427
  2. Polymorphisms in twelve candidate genes are associated with growth, muscle lipid profile and meat quality traits in eleven European cattle breeds vol.41, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3343-y
  3. Association of carcass weight with quality and functional properties of beef from Hanwoo steers vol.55, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13411
  4. Consumer Acceptability of Intramuscular Fat vol.36, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.6.699
  5. Effects of animal class and genotype on beef muscle nanostructure, pHu, colour and tenderness vol.Volume 112, pp.Number 7/8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150056
  6. Muscle profiling of retail characteristics within the Canadian cull cow grades pp.1918-1825, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1139/CJAS-2017-0001
  7. muscle and its relationships with intramuscular fat, shear force, and environmental factors vol.98, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0064

Acknowledgement

Supported by : China's Ministry of Agriculture