DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elimination of the effect of strain gradient from concrete compressive strength test results

  • Tabsh, Sami W. (Civil Engineering Department, American University of Sharjah)
  • Received : 2005.10.12
  • Accepted : 2006.10.12
  • Published : 2006.12.25

Abstract

Poor strength test results are sometimes not an indication of low concrete quality, but rather inferior testing quality. In a compression test, the strain distribution over the ends of the specimen is a critical factor for the test results. Non-uniform straining of a concrete specimen leads to locally different compressive stresses on the cross-section, and eventual premature breaking of the specimen. Its effect on a specimen can be quantified by comparing the compressive strength results of two specimens, one subjected to uniform strain and another to a specified strain gradient. This can be done with the help of a function that relates two parameters, the strain ratio and the test efficiency. Such a function depends on the concrete strength and cross-sectional shape of the specimen. In this study, theoretical relationships between the strain ratio and test efficiency are developed using a concrete stress-strain model. The results show that for the same strain ratio, the test efficiency is larger for normal strength concrete than for high strength concrete. Further, the effect of the strain gradient on the test result depends on the cross-sectional shape of the specimen. Implementation of the results is demonstrated with the aid of two examples.

References

  1. Analen, A., Lupin, T., and Ohlsson, G. (1998), 'Application of the strain-cylinder test for calibration of compression testing machines', SP Report 1998:43, Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, 43 pp
  2. ASTM (2001), Standard test method for strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, C39/C39M-01, American Society for Testing and Materials, Conshohocken, PA
  3. Burg, R.G., Caldarone, M.A., Detwiler, G, Jansen, D.C., and Willems, T.J. (1999), 'Compression testing of HSC: Latest technology', Concrete International, ACI, 21(8), pp. 67-76
  4. Carino, N.J., Guthrie, W.E., Lagergren, B.S., and Mullings, G.M. (1994), 'Effects of testing variables on the strength ofhigh-strength (90 MPa) concrete cylinders', Special Publication No. 149, Edited by Malhotra, ACI, Detroit, pp. 589-632
  5. Detwiler, R.J. and Bickley, J.A. (1993), 'An analysis of interlaboratory test program results', New Concrete Technology: Robert E. Philleo Symposium, SP-141, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp. 103-115
  6. Kennedy, S., Detwiler, R., Bickley, J., and Thomas, M. (1995), 'Results of an interlaboratory test program: Compressive strength of concrete', Cement Concrete Aggr., American Society for Testing and Materials, 17(1), June, pp. 3-10 https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10330J
  7. Luker, I. (2003), 'The achievement of uniformity of straining during concrete cube testing in South Africa', J. South African Inst. Civ. Eng., 4(1), pp. 2-8
  8. Luker, I., and Tabsh, S.W. (2004), 'Effect of non-uniform straining on concrete cmpressive strength', Concrete Cement Aggr., American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), 26(2), pp. 42-51
  9. Mansur, M.A., and Islam, M.M. (2001), 'Interpretation of concrete strength for nonstandard specimens', J. Mater. Civ. Eng., ASCE, 14(2), April, pp. 151-155
  10. Richardson, D.N. (1991), 'Review of variables that influence measured concrete compressive strength', J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 3(2), May, pp. 95-112 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1991)3:2(95)
  11. Thomfeldt, E., Tomaszewics, A., and Jensen, J.J. (1987), 'Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete and application in design', Proceedings of the Sypmposium 'Utilization of High Strength Concrete', Stavanger, Norway, June, Tapir, Trondheim, pp. 149-159

Cited by

  1. Strain gradient effects on concrete stress–strain curve vol.165, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.10.00056
  2. Strain-Gradient-Dependent Stress-Strain Curve for Normal-Strength Concrete vol.16, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.11.1911