Literature Review: Pedagogical Content Knowledge as Specialized Knowledge for Teaching

  • Lee, Eun-Mi (Department of Learning Sciences, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University)
  • Published : 2007.11.30

Abstract

During the last two decades, many researchers have attempted to understand pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Now it is time to think about how to apply the theoretical aspects of PCK to practice. In an attempt to address this issue, it is indispensable to review the existing literature on teachers' knowledge bases and PCK. Therefore, the purposes of this paper are to look at how the concept of PCK has been developed and extended over the past two decades as well as to provide a shared understanding of PCK for the practical use of this concept in teacher education programs. The paper begins with a discussion of various models of teachers' knowledge as conceptualized by several renowned researchers, moves on to a review of existing research focusing on the knowledge of science teachers, then examines the literature on PCK as a critical part of teachers' professional knowledge, and finally concludes with an integrated operational definition of PCK that can be employed into designing teacher education programs.

Keywords

teacher knowledge;pedagogical content knowledge;teacher education

References

  1. Baxter, J.A. and Lederman, N.G., (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowlege. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 147-161). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  2. Carlsen, W. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 113-144). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  3. Fernandez-Balvoa, J. and Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(3). 293-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00030-A
  4. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., and Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
  5. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., and Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  6. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L.S., & Richert, A.E. (1987). '150 different ways' of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching, In. J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell
  7. Schwab, J.J. (1964). The structure of disciplines: Meanings and significance. In G.W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally
  8. Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. and Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.L. Gabel (ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. New York: National Science Teachers Association
  9. Cochran, K.F., DeRuiter, J.A., King, R.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004
  10. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge :From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of teacher education, 41(3). 3-11
  11. Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 263-268 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(91)90033-L
  12. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  13. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher Thinking: A Study of Practical Knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing Company
  14. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp.95-132). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  15. Leinhart, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject-matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.247
  16. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004); In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(4), 370-391 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  17. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp.3-pp.17). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  18. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
  19. Veal, W.R. (2004). Beliefs and knowledge in chemistry teacher development. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 329-351 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097389
  20. Barnett, J. & Hudson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426-453 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1017
  21. Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan
  22. Bybee, R. W. & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2001). National Science Education Standards as a catalyst for change: The essential role of professional development. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Issues in science education: Professional development planning and design (pp. 1-12). Arlington, VA: NSTA
  23. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J.S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14
  24. Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14
  25. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy
  26. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22 https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  27. Loughran, J., Milroy, Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education. 31, 289-307 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013124409567
  28. Kagan, D.M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003419
  29. Grossman, P.L. (1990) The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge & teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press