The Influences of Grouping Method on Science Achievement and Self-efficacy in Middle School Science Instruction Using Reciprocal Peer Tutoring Strategy

상호동료교수 전략을 활용한 중학교 과학 수업에서 소집단 구성 방법이 과학 성취도 및 자아효능감에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2007.04.30


This study investigated the influences of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) strategy on middle school students' science achievement, self-efficacy, perception of instruction by grouping method and science achievement level. Eighth graders from a middle school in Seoul were assigned to comparison, homogeneous RPT, and heterogeneous RPT groups. The students were taught about 'separation of mixtures' for 8 class hours. After the instructions, a science achievement test consisting of three subtests (knowledge, understanding, and application), a self-efficacy test, and a questionnaire about the perception of instruction were administered. The analysis of the results revealed that the scores of heterogeneous RPT group, regardless of the students prior science achievement level, were significantly higher than those of the other groups in the knowledge and understanding subtests, and the self-efficacy test. The scores of homogeneous RPT group were significantly higher than those of the comparison group in the knowledge subtest but not in the understanding subtest and the self-efficacy test. The low-level students in heterogeneous RPT group performed better in the science achievement test and the application subtest than those in the other groups. The high-level students in RPT groups performed better in the science achievement test than those in comparison group. However, there was no significant difference for the application subtest scores of the high-level students of the three groups. Most students in RPT groups perceived positively on the instructions. The students in heterogeneous RPT group and low-level students especially showed more positive perception of the instruction than those in homogeneous RPT group and high-level students.


reciprocal peer tutoring;grouping method;science achievement;self-efficacy


  1. 노태희, 김소연, 김경순 (2005). 중학교 과학 수업에서 학생들의 구조화된 상호작용을 유도하기 위한 상호 동료교수 전략의 효과 .한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), 465-471
  2. 정운성 (2002). 협동학습의 이해와 실천. 교육과학사
  3. Fantuzzo, J. W, Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 173-177
  4. Griffin, B. W., & Griffin, M. M (1997). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on graduate students' achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 197-209
  5. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69
  6. Gillies, R. M, & A. F. Ashman (1995). The effects of gender and ability on students' behaviors and interactions in classroom-based work groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 211-225
  7. Ginsburg-Block, M, & Fantuzzo, J. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: A analysis of 'teacher' and 'student' interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(2), 134-149
  8. Gaustad, J. (1993). Peer and cross-age tutoring. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 367-379
  9. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35
  10. Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637-644
  11. 노태희, 차정호, 전경문, 정태호, 한재영, 최용남 (1999). 개념 학습에 적용한 협동학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(3), 400-408
  12. 박병렬, 김범기 (2002). 과학 실험 수업에서 소집단 구성 방법이 중학생들의 탐구 능력 향상에 미치는 효과. 청람과학교육연구논총, 12(1), 1-15
  13. Cohen, P. A, Kulik, J. A, & Kulik, C-L. C (1982). Educational outcomes of peer tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248
  14. Pintrich, P. R, & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40
  15. Rittschof, K. A, & Griffin, B. W (2001). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Re-examining the value of a cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 313-331
  16. Bowers, C. A, Pharmer, J. A, & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31(3), 305-327
  17. King, A (1989). Effects of a metacognitive strategy on high school students' comprehension of lectures. ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 305149
  18. 윤초희 (2003). 또래 간 상호작용이 아동의 추론에 마치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 17(2), 289-314
  19. Fantuzzo, J. W, King, J. A, & Heller, L. R (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and' school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339
  20. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collabcrative learning context. Theory into Practive, 41(1), 26-32
  21. Good, T. L., Mulryan, C, & McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathmatics' A call for programmatic research on small-group process. In D. A Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan. 165-196
  22. 손영, 김성일 (2005). 또래교수 집단구성 방식이 학업성취도와 교과흥미에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 19(3), 595-613
  23. 이주연, 김희백 (2002). 중학교 과학에서 소집단 구성을 달리한 협동 학습의 학습자 수준에 따른 효과. 한국생물교육학회지, 30(4), 353-362
  24. Rohrbeek, C. A, Fantuzzo, J. W, Ginsburg-Block, M. D., & Miller, T. R (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta -analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257
  25. Cohen, E. G. (1998). Making cooperative learning equitable. Educational Leadership, 56(1), 18-21
  26. Sanders, P. (2001). Peer tutoring, An effective instructional strategy. Paper presented at the Louisiana Educational Research Association, Annual Conference, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  27. Johnson, D. W, Johnson, R. T, & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co