DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TOXICITY IDENTIFICATION AND CONFIRMATION OF METAL PLATTING WASTEWATER

  • Published : 2007.02.28

Abstract

Toxicity of metal plating wastewater was evaluated by using acute toxicity tests on Daphnia magna. To identify toxicants of metal plating wastewater, several manipulations such as solid phase extraction (SPE), ion exchange and graduated pH adjustment were used. The SPE test had no significant effect on baseline toxicity, suggesting absence of toxic non-polar organics in metal plating wastewater. However, anion exchange largely decreased the baseline toxicity by 88%, indicating the causative toxicants were inorganic anions. Considering high concentration of chromium in metal plating wastewater, it is thought the anion is Cr(VI) species. Graduated pH test showing independence of the toxicity on pH change strongly supports this assumption. However, as revealed by toxicity confirmation experiment, the initial toxicity of metal plating wastewater (24-h TU=435) was not explained only by Cr(VI) (24-h TU = 725 at $280\;mg\;L^{-1}$). Addition of nickel($29.5\;mg\;L^{-1}$) and copper ($26.5\;mg\;L^{-1}$) largely decreased the chromium toxicity up to 417 TU, indicating antagonistic interaction between heavy metals. This heavy metal interaction was successfully predicted by an equation of 24-h $TU\;=\;3.67\;{\times}\;\ln([Cu]\;+\;[Ni])\;+\;79.44$ at a fixed concentration of chromium.

Keywords

Bioassay;Daphnia magna;Heavy metals;Metal plating wastewater;Toxicity identification

References

  1. Choi, K., Meier, P. G., and Zong, M., 'Relationship of chemical-based effluent regulations of Korea to aquatic toxicities to microbes, macroinvertebrates, and fish,' Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 72, 1067-1074 (2004)
  2. Oh, K. T., Kim, J. W., Kim, W. K., Lee, S. A., Yun, H. G., and Lee, S. K., 'Ecotoxicity assessment of industrial effluent in Korea,' J. Kor. Soc. Water Qual., 22, 37-44 (2006)
  3. Hernando, M. D., Fernandez-Alba, A. R., Tauler, R. and Barcelo, D., 'Toxicity assays applied to wastewater treatment,' Talanta, 65, 358-366 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.07.012
  4. USEP A, Methods for aquatic toxicity identification evaluations: Phase I toxicity characterization procedures, EPA 600/6-91-003, Washington DC (1991)
  5. Choi, K., and Meier, P. G., 'Toxicity evaluation of metal plating wastewater employing the Microtox$circledR$ assay: A comparison with cladocerans and fish,' Environ. Toxicol., 16, 136-141 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.1017
  6. Hyun, J. H., Kim, M. G., and Kim, S. J., 'Removal of toxic materials ($Cr^{6+}$, $CN^-$) in metal plating wastewater by steel mill wastes(I),' J Kor. Solid Waste Eng., Soc., 17, 472-479 (2000)
  7. OECD, Guideline for testing of chemicals, No. 202., Paris (2004)
  8. Mount, D. R., and Hockett, J. R., 'Use of toxicity identification evaluation methods to characterize, identify, and confirm hexavalent chromium toxicity in an industrial effluent,' Water Res., 34, 1379-1385 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00271-7
  9. Ince, N. H., Dirilgen, N., Apikyan, I. G., Tezcanli, G., and Ustun, B., 'Assessment of toxic interactions of heavy metals in binary mixtures: A statistical approach,' Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 36, 365-372 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006607
  10. Poljsak, B., Gazdag, Z., Jexko-Bricovec, J., Fujs, S., Pesti, M., Belagyi, J., Plesnicar, S., and Raspor, P., 'Pro-oxidative vs antioxidative properties of ascorbic acid in chromium(VI)induced damage; an in vivo and in vitro approach,' J. Appl. Toxicol., 25, 535-548 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1093
  11. Teissere, H., and Guy, V., 'Copper-induced changes in antioxidant enzymes activity in fronts of duckweed (Lemna minor),' Plant Sci., 153, 65-72 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00257-5
  12. Munzinger, A and Monicelli, F., 'Heavy metal co-tolerance in a chromium tolerant strain of Daphnia magna,' Aqu. Toxicol., 23, 203-216 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(92)90053-P