DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Validation of Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Levofloxacin and Ambroxol in Tablets

알약에서의 Levofloxacin와 Ambroxol의 검출을 위한 동시 UV 분광법의 개발 및 검정

  • Patil, Tabassum (Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy) ;
  • Pore, Yogesh (Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy)
  • Published : 2008.12.20

Abstract

Keywords

Levofloxacin Hemihydrate ; Ambroxol Hydrochloride ; UV Spectrophometry ; Q analysis ; Dosage Form

INTRODUCTION

Levofloxacin hemihydrate (LFX) (Fig. 1A) chemically, [(-)(s)-9-fluro-2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-10-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl-7-oxo-7H-pyrido[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazine-6-carboxylic acid is an optically L-isomer of ofloxacin.1 It is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone class of antibacterial agent and effective against many gram positive and gram negative bacteria.2,3 It is a potent inhibitor of bacterial DNA gyrase enzyme (topoisomerase II & IV), which is necessary for negative supercoiling of DNA prior to replication.4

Ambroxol hydrochloride (ABX) (Fig. 1B) chemically, 4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibromophenyl)-methyl]-amino] cyclohexanol hydrochloride is a mucolytic expectorant and used to reduce the viscosity of mucous secretions.5

A fixed dose combination of levofloxacin hemihydrate (LFX) and ambroxol hydrochloride (ABX) is available for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

Fig. 1.(A) Chemical structure of levofloxacin (LFX), (B) Chemical structure of ambroxol (ABX).

Literature survey reveals that several methods have been developed for the quantitative determination of LFX in formulations as well as in plasma and urine. These include capillary electrophoresis and UV spectrophotometry,6 HPLC,7-10 simultaneous HPTLC method with ornidazole11 and flow injection analysis.12

It has been reported that ambroxol hydrochloride has been estimated by capillary electrophoresis,13-15 spectrophotometry,16 gas chromatography,17,18 liquid chromatography with potentiometric estimation,19 MS detection,20 UV detection,21-24 RP HPLC,25,21 Raman spectroscopy,26 liquid chromatography with roxithromycin27 and derivative UV and HPLC.28 Simultaneous reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of LFX and ABX in pharmaceutical formulations has been also reported.29

However, most of the analytical methods developed for the quantization of LFX and ABX involve analysis of single component, except HPTLC for LFX and HPLC for ABX, which are simultaneous and quite expensive. To our knowledge, no simultaneous UV spectrophotometric method is available for quantitative determination of LFX and ABX in pharmaceutical dosage form.

This work was aimed to investigate the utility of UV spectrophotometric method in the simultaneous determination of LFX and ABX in pharmaceutical preparations. The method had sufficiently good accuracy, precision and permitted a simple and cost effective assay for these compounds in mixtures.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Method development

LFX and ABX, both are freely soluble in water, hence double distilled water was chosen as a solvent for their determination in solid dosage forms. The UV spectra of standard solutions of LFX and ABX (10 μg/mL each) were determined separately in distilled water (Fig. 2A and 2B). The λmax of LFX was found to be 287 nm whereas the λmax of ABX was recorded at 245 nm.

Initially, simultaneous equation method was tried for the determination of drugs in their dosage forms, as ABX showed negligible absorbance at the λmax of LFX. However, LFX showed considerable absorbance at the λmax of ABX. Therefore, absorbance ratio (Q analysis) method was applied for the analysis of both the drugs in tablets.

The developed method for the simultaneous analysis of LFX and ABX was validated with respect to stability, linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, specificity, robustness and ruggedness.30-33

The stability of both the drugs in distilled water was checked by recording their UV spectra at an appropriate time interval for up to 36 hours. They were compared with freshly prepared solutions and not any difference was found between them. This indicated that both these drugs were highly stable in solution phase. Further, a UV spectrum of standard solution containing LFX and ABX (mixture) was also recorded to check any chemical interaction between these drugs. The λmax of both the drugs in a mixture was found to be similar as compared to individual drugs indicating no chemical interference with each other (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.(A) λmax of levofloxacin (LFX) in distilled water, (B) λmax of ambroxol (ABX) in distilled water, (C) λmax of mixture of levofloxacin + ambroxol in distilled water, (D) Overlain spectra of levofloxacin and ambroxol in distilled water.

Q analysis method

The ratio of two absorbance determined on the two solutions at two different wavelengths is constant. This constant is termed as Q value. The Q value is independent of concentration and thickness of solution and therefore is used to access the purity of compounds. The absorbance ratio method is a modification of the simultaneous equation procedure. Graphical absorption ratio method uses the ratio of observed absorbance at two selected wavelengths, one of which is isoabsorptive point. It depends on property for that substance which obeys Beer’s law at all wavelengths. The ratio of absorbance at any wavelength is constant value independent of concentration or path length.

For Q analysis method, the overlain spectra of LFX and ABX were recorded in the range of 400 to 200 nm. It showed that (Fig. 2D) the peaks were well resolved, satisfying the criteria for obtaining maximum precision, based on absorbance ratios.34 The criteria being the ratios, (A2/A1)/(ax2/ax1) and (ay2/ay1)/(A2/A1), should lie outside the range 0.1-2.0 for the precise determination of X (LFX) and Y (ABX), respectively. Where A1, A2 represents the absorbance of the mixture at λ1 (wavelength at isoabsorptive point) and λ2 (λmax of LFX), ax1 and ax2 denote absorptivities of X at λ1 and λ2, and ay1 and ay2 denote absorptivities of Y at λ1 and λ2, respectively. In the present work, the above criteria was found to be satisfied for LFX (X) and ABX (Y), where λ1 was 219 nm and λ2 287 nm for Q-absorbance method.

In the quantitative assay of LFX and ABX in an admixture by absorbance ratio method, absorbances were measured at any two wavelengths, one being iso-absorptive point (λ1) and the other being λmax of one of the component i.e. LFX (λ2). Two equations were constructed as described below (Eq. 1 and Eq. 2), using the relationship ax1= ay1 at λ1 and b= 1 cm. Equations are

and

Dividing Eq. 2 by Eq. 1

Dividing each term by CX+CY and let FX = CX / (CX+CY) and FY = CY/(CX + CY) where, FX and FY are the fractions of X and Y respectively in the mixture of LFX and ABX.

But FY = 1− FX

Let

Eq. (3) gives the fraction of X in the mixture of LFX and ABX. For the determination of absolute concentration of X and Y the equation 5 was rearranged.

From Eq. 3

Similarly,

Where, CX and CY are concentrations of LFX and ABX, respectively.34

Linearity and precision

In quantitative analysis the calibration curve was constructed for both LFX and ABX after analysis of consecutively increased concentrations. To check the precision and reproducibility of the method, six samples of the same concentration (n=6) of LFX and ABX were prepared and analysed. The low % RSD values obtained for LFX (0.83) and ABX (0.29) indicated that the method had high precision and reproducibility. The regression equation, slope, intercept, correlation coefficient, precision and linearity range are given in Table 1.

Table 1.LFX: Levofloxacin; ABX: Ambroxol hydrochloride; a: at 219 nm; b: at 287 nm; *Indicates mean of six determinations (n=6).

Analysis in tablet formulations

For the determination of LFX and ABX from pharmaceutical tablet formulations by Q analysis method, the absorbance of sample solutions and absorptivity values at the particular wavelengths were calculated and substituted in the following equation (equations 4 and 5) to obtain the concentrations of two components.

CLFX=(QM-QY)×A1/(QX-QY)×ax1, CABX=(QM-QX)× A1/(QY-QX)×ay1 where, CLFX and CABX are concentrations of LFX and ABX, respectively, A1 is the absorbance of sample at 219 nm, ax1 is the absorptivity of LFX at 219 nm, ax2 is the absorptivity of LFX at 287 nm, ay1 is absorptivity of ABX at 219 nm, ay2 is absorptivity of ABX at 287 nm, QX was obtained by using the equation, (absorptivity of LFX at 287 nm ax2)/(absorptivity of LFX at 219 nm ax1). Similarly, QY was obtained from (absorptivity of ABX at 287 nm ay2)/(absorptivity of ABX at 219 nm ay1) and QM from, (absorbance of sample at 287 nm A2)/(absorbance of sample at 219 nm A1). The respective absorptivity values for LFX and ABX at λ1 and λ2 are represented in Table 2. The results obtained from analysis of dosage forms are given in Table 4.

Table 2.LFX: Levofloxacin; ABX: Ambroxol hydrochloride; * Indicates mean of three experiments; S.D.: Standard deviation.

Table 3.LFX: Levofloxacin; ABX: Ambroxol hydrochloride; a: at 219 nm; b: at 287 nm.

Table 4.LFX: Levofloxacin; ABX: Ambroxol hydrochloride; * Indicates mean of six determinations (n=6).

Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ)

Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) decide about the sensitivity of the method. LOD is the lowest detectable concentration of the analyte by the method while LOQ is the minimum quantifiable concentration. LOD and LOQ of LFX and ABX were calculated according to the equations 6 and 7 respectively at both the λmax where, δ is the standard deviation of blank and s is slope of calibration.35

The limit of detection (LOD) for LFX was 0.1 μg/ml and 0.2 μg/ml at λmax of 219 nm and λmax of 287 nm respectively while, the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.31 μg/ml and 0.38 μg/ml at the respective λmax. For ABX, The LOD was found to be 0.11 μg/ml and 0.02 μg/ml at λmax of 219 nm and λmax of 287 nm respectively while, the LOQ was 0.35μg/ml and 3.5 μg/ml at the respective λmax (Table 1). The linearity, LOD and LOQ values of LFX and ABX obtained from UV method have been compared with the reported method.29 The data displayed in Table 3, indicates high sensitivity of the UV method over reported one.

Reproducibility

The accuracy and specificity of the proposed method was tested by recovery experiments. Recovery studies were carried out at 100 % level by adding a known quantity of pure drug to the preanalyzed formulation and the proposed method was followed. From the amount of drug found, percentage recovery was calculated (Table 4). The % recovery for LFX and ABX were found to be in the range of 100.53-101% (% RSD 0.51-1.51) and 99.69-101.84% (% RSD 0.49-0.76) respectively for both the formulations tested. The high recovery rate with low % RSD values indicated that the method had a good accuracy and specificity, as there was no interference from the excipients present in formulations.

Intra-day precision and accuracy were evaluated by analyzing three samples of two different concentrations, prepared on same day. Inter-day variability was assessed by analyzing two concentrations on three different days, over a period of one week. No significant difference was found in these experiments, indicating accuracy and reproducibility of the assays. The % RSD values reported in Table 5 shows that proposed method provides acceptable intra-day and inter-day variation of LFX and ABX.

Ruggedness of the proposed methods was determined by analyzing LFX and ABX by different analysts, using similar operational and environmental conditions; the % RSD values are reported in Table 5 and found to be less than 2 %.

Table 5.LFX: Levofloxacin; ABX: Ambroxol hydrochloride; n: No. of experiments.

Robustness of the proposed method was checked by minor changes on the selected wavelength. Since the absorbance was not significantly affected, the proposed method could be considered as robust.

 

EXPERIMENTAL

Instrumentation

A Shimadzu 1700 UV (Shimadzu, Japan) spectrophotometer with 1 cm matched quartz cells was used for the estimation.

Chemicals and reagents

LFX and ABX were kindly supplied by Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India, as gift samples. Tablets containing LFX and ABX were procured from local pharmacy. All the reagents were of analytical grade. Double distilled water was used throughout the experiment.

Standard Preparation

Accurately weighed quantities (10 mg each) of LFX and ABX were dissolved separately in sufficient quantity of distilled water in a 100 ml volumetric flask. The solutions were sonicated and the volume was adjusted up to the mark with distilled water to obtain a stock solution of 100 μg/ml; each of LFX and ABX. For the selection of analytical wavelength for the Q absorbance method, the stock solutions of LFX and ABX were separately diluted in distilled water, to get concentrations of 10 μg/ml each, and scanned in the wavelength range of 200-400 nm. From the overlain spectra of both drugs, wavelengths 219 nm (isoabsorptive point) and 287 nm (λmax of LFX) were selected for the formation of Q-absorbance equation. For calibration curves, stock solutions of LFX and ABX were appropriately diluted to obtain concentration range of 2-20 μg/ml and 5-50 μg/ml respectively. The absorbance of LFX was measured at 287 nm and 219 nm, and calibration curves were plotted. Similarly the absorbance of ABX was measured at 219 nm and 287 nm, and calibration curves were plotted. The absorptivities (A1%, 1 cm) of each drug at both the wavelengths were also determined.

Sample preparation

For the estimation of drugs from the commercial formulations, twenty tablets of two brands L-cin A (Lupin Ltd., Mumbai, India) and Mucosyn (Alembic Ltd., Vadodara, India) containing 500 mg of LFX and 75 mg of ABX were weighed, and finely powdered. For the analysis of drugs, a standard addition method was used. An accurately weighed 175 mg of pure ABX was added to finely powdered samples to bring the concentration of ABX in linearity range. With this addition, the ratio of LFX to ABX in samples was brought to 2:1. Quantity of powder equivalent to 20 mg of LFX and 10 mg of ABX was transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask, dissolved in sufficient quantity of distilled water, sonicated and the volume was adjusted up to the mark with distilled water to obtain a stock solution of 200 μg/ml of LFX and 100 μg/ml of ABX. The solution was then filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 41 and the filtrate was appropriately diluted to obtain final concentrations 10 μg/ml of LFX and 5 μg/ml of ABX. Absorbance of this solution was measured at appropriate wavelengths, and values were substituted in the respective formulae to obtain concentrations.

 

CONCLUSION

The proposed method was successfully applied to the simultaneous determination of LFX and ABX from pharmaceutical tablet formulation. The presented method was found to be simple, accurate, precise, rugged and robust. It can be directly and easily applied to the analysis of the combined pharmaceutical tablet formulation of LFX and ABX. Moreover, the present method is quick and costeffective as compared to chromatographic techniques. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed method provides an alternative procedure for the quality control of LFX and ABX in pharmaceutical formulations.

References

  1. Colombo, L.; Marcucci, F. M.; Marini, G. M.; Pierfederici, P.; Mussini, E. J. Chromatogr. B. 1990, 530, 141 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(00)82313-0
  2. Sweetman, S. C. Martindale The Complete Drug Reference; 33rd ed., Pharmaceutical Press: London, 2002; p. 219
  3. Lorian, V.; Williams, L. Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine; 4th ed., 1996; p. 591
  4. Hardman, J.; Goodman, A. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics; 9th ed., McGraw-Hill: NY, 1996; p. 1065
  5. Chepurwar, S. B.; Shirkhedkar, S. B.; Bari, S. B.; Fursule, R. A.; Surana, S. J. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2007, 45, 531 https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/45.8.531
  6. Pospiilova, M.; Polaek, M.; Jokl, V.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2001, 24, 421 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00448-9
  7. Reddy, N. M.; Kanna Rao, K. V.; Swapna, M.; Sarkar, D. G. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 60, 249
  8. Schmid, J. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 414, 65 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(87)80025-7
  9. Bazylak, G.; Nagels, L. J. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 32, 887 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00191-2
  10. Heinanen, M.; Barbas, C. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2001, 24, 1005 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00533-1
  11. Koundourellis, J. E.; Malliou, E. T.; Broussali, T. A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2000, 23, 469 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00318-6
  12. Brizzi, V.; Pasetti, U. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1990, 8, 107 https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(90)80015-H
  13. Indrayanto, G.; Handayani, R. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1993, 11, 781 https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(93)80189-8
  14. Hwang, M. S.; Cho, S.; Chung, H.; Woo, Y. A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 8, 210
  15. Dincer, Z.; Basan, H.; Goger, N. G. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 5, 867
  16. Kothekar, K. M.; Balasundaram, J.; Khandhar, A. P.; Mishra, R. K.; Eurasian J. Anal. Chem. 2007, 2, 21 https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac/78053
  17. Ines, M.; Santoro, R. M.; Singh, A. K.; Erika, R. M.; Hackmam, K. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 40, 179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.06.018
  18. Budavari, S. The Merck Index; 12th ed., Merck and Co. Inc.: Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996; p. 404
  19. Fabre, H.; Altria, K. D. LC-GC. 2001, 14, 302
  20. Braggio, S.; Barnaby, R. J.; Grossi, P.; Cugola, M. A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1996, 14, 375 https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(95)01644-9
  21. Beckett, A. H.; Stenlake, J. B. Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry; 4th ed., Part-II, CBS Publisher: New Delhi, 1997; p. 275
  22. Busaranon, K.; Suntornsuk, W.; Suntornsuk, L. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.008
  23. ICH, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. 1996
  24. Bertino, J.; Fish, D. Clin. Ther. 2000, 22, 798 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80053-3
  25. Belal, F.; Al-Majed, A.; Al-Obaid, A. M. Talanta. 1999, 50, 765 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00139-3
  26. Neckle, U.; Joukhadar, C.; Mayer, B. X. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2002, 463, 199 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00429-4
  27. Wong, F. A.; Juzwin, S. J.; Flor, S. C. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1997, 15, 765 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(96)01890-0
  28. Siewert, S. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 1360 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.02.010
  29. Altiokka, G.; Atkosar, Z.; Can, N. O. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002, 30, 881 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00354-0
  30. Perez-Ruiz, T.; Martinez-Lozano, C. C.; Sanz, C.; Bravo, E. J. Chromatogr. B. 2000, 742, 205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00150-X
  31. Perez-Ruiz, T.; Martinez-Lozano, C.; Sanz, A.; Bravo, E. J. Chromatogr. B. 1997, 692, 199 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(96)00482-3
  32. Kim, H.; Yoo, J. Y.; Han, S. B.; Lee, H. J.; Lee, K. R. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 32, 209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00059-1
  33. Nobilis, M.; Pastera, J.; Svoboda, D.; Kvtina, J.; Macek, K. J. Chromatogr. 1992, 581, 251 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(92)80278-X
  34. Qi, M.; Wang, P.; Cong R.; Yang, J. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 35, 1287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2004.04.001
  35. Ermer, J.; Ploss, H. J.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 37, 859 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2004.06.018

Cited by

  1. Gold nanoparticles-based fluorescence enhancement of the terbium-levofloxacin system and its application in pharmaceutical preparations vol.26, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.1311
  2. Method for determination of fluoroquinolones based on the plasmonic interaction between their fluorescent terbium complexes and silver nanoparticles vol.174, pp.3-4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-011-0633-0