The Development of Pre-Engineering Educational Program Model Based on STEM Integration Approach

STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학 교육 프로그램 모형 개발

  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop pre-engineering educational program model based on STEM integration approach. To accomplish this purpose literature review and content validity ratio survey were carried out. The main results of this study were as follows: First, the conceptual model of STEM integration approach was constituted. Second, the conceptual model of pre-engineering educational program model based on STEM integration approach was proposed. Third, the formation steps of inquiry project activity, problem solving activity, and creative engineering design activity were developed to structure the educational program.

Keywords

STEM Integration Approach;Pre-Engineering Educational Program;Engineering Education

References

  1. 교육과학기술부(2008a). 중학교 교육과정 해설(III) - 수학, 과학, 기술.가정-. 교육과학기술부
  2. 김진수(2007). 기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색. 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), 1-29
  3. 이창훈(2007). 창의 공학 설계 교육 프로그램이 공 학 입문자의 창의력과 공학 설계 능력에 미치 는 효과. 충남대학교 박사학위논문
  4. 조승호(2002). 중고등교육과 공학기술. 공학교육과 기술, 9(2), 26-28
  5. Dearing, B. M. & Daugherty, M. K. (2004). Delivering engineering content in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 8-11
  6. MDE(2006). Massachusetts science and Technology/ Engineering Curriculum Framework. Massachusetts Department of Education
  7. Pierce, A. J. & Karwatka, D. (2005). Introduction to Technology. Glencoe
  8. Project Lead The Way. (2005). About Project Lead The Way: An overview. Clifton Park, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.pltw.org
  9. Ritz, J. M. (2006). Technology and engineering are both addressed through technology education. The Technology Teacher, 66(3), 19-21
  10. Berry, R. Q., Reed, P. A., Ritz, J. M., Lin, C. Y., Hsiung, S., & Frazier, W. (2005). STEM initiatives: Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement. The Technology Teacher, 64(4), 23-29
  11. Smith, K. L. & Burghardt, D. (2007). Teaching engineering at the k-12 level: Two perspectives. The Technology Teacher, 66(7), 20-24
  12. 국립국어원(1999). 표준국어대사전. 두산동아
  13. 류혜숙(2007). 이공계, 정말 위기인가? 한국교육개발원
  14. Koch, J. & Burghardt, M. D. (2002). Design technology in the elementary school: A study of teacher action research. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 21-32
  15. 이윤배(2007). 이공계 위기, 확실한 비전이 필요하 다. 한국교육개발원
  16. 한국교육개발원 교육통계센터(2007). 자연계열과 공 학계열 입학자 수 추이. 한국교육개발원
  17. Foster, P. N. & Wright, M. D. (2001). How children think about design and technology: Two case studies. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 38(2), 40-64
  18. 교육과학기술부(2008b). 초등학교 교육과정 해설(IV) -수학, 과학, 실과-. 교육과학기술부
  19. Gustafson, B. J., Rowell, P. M., & Guilbert, S. M (2000). Elementary children's awareness of strategies for testing structural strength: A three year study. Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 5-22
  20. 이영무.전규동.배영찬(2001). 청소년의 이공계대학 진학률 감소에 따른 대책방안. 한양대학교. 국가과학기술자문회의
  21. 이병기.강성군.권숙인.김하석.윤대희.손소영 (2004). 우수 이공계 인력 확보 방안 수립. 한 국공학교육학회.국가과학기술자문회의
  22. Salinger, G. L. (2005). The engineering of technology education. Journal of Technology Studies, 31(1), 2-6
  23. 김태훈.이소이.노태천(2005). 공학설계능력의 평가 요소 구명. 한국공학교육학회(편), 2005년도 공 학교육 학술대회 논문집(pp. 207-214). 한국공 학교육학회
  24. Carroll, D.R. (1997). Bridge engineering for the elementary grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), 221-226 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00288.x
  25. Koen, B. V. (1994). Toward a strategy for teaching engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(3), 193-201 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb01104.x
  26. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  27. 김익수(2006). 공업계 고등학교 전문교과 수업에서 문제중심학습이 학생들의 행동목표 성취도에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교 대학원 박사학위 논 문
  28. Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. N. (2007). A model for the integration of science, technolog, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 66(4), 24-26