DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ruminal Protein Degradation Characteristics of Cell Mass from Lysine Production

  • Seo, S. (206 ERML, 1201 W. Gregory Dr. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Kim, H.J. (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, S.Y. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ha, Jong K. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2007.09.28
  • Accepted : 2007.11.15
  • Published : 2008.03.01

Abstract

Chemical analysis and in vitro studies were conducted to investigate the nutritive value for ruminants of cell mass from lysine production (CMLP) which is a by-product of the lysine manufacturing process. Proximate analysis, protein fractionation, and in vitro protein degradation using protease from Streptomyces griseus and strained ruminal fluid were carried out to estimate ruminal protein degradability of CMLP with two reference feedstuffs-soybean meal (SBM) and fish meal (FM). Amino acid composition and pepsin-HCl degradability were also determined to evaluate postruminal availability. CMLP contained 67.8% crude protein with a major portion being soluble form (45.4% CP) which was composed of mainly ammonium nitrogen (81.8% soluble CP). The amount of nucleic acids was low (1.15% DM). The total amount of amino acids contained in CMLP was 40.60% DM, which was lower than SBM (47.69% DM) or FM (54.08% DM). CMLP was composed of mainly fraction A and fraction B2, while the protein fraction in SBM was mostly B2 and FM contained high proportions of B2 and B3 fractions. The proportion of B3 fraction, slowly degradable protein, in CP was the highest in fish meal (23.34%), followed by CMLP (7.68%) and SBM (1.46%). CMLP was degraded up to 51.40% at 18 h of incubation with Streptomyces protease, which was low compared to FM (55.23%) and SBM (83.01%). This may be due to the insoluble portion of CMLP protein being hardly degradable by the protease. The in vitro fermentation by strained ruminal fluid showed that the amount of soluble fraction was larger in CMLP (40.6%) than in SBM (17.8%). However, because the degradation rate constant of the potentially degradable fraction of CMLP (2.0%/h) was lower than that of SBM (5.8%/h), the effective ruminal protein degradability of CMLP (46.95%) was slightly lower than SBM (53.77%). Unavailable fraction in the rumen was higher in CMLP (34.0%) compared to SBM (8.8%). In vitro CP degradability of CMLP by pepsin was 80.37%, which was lower than SBM (94.42%) and FM (89.04%). The evaluation of protein degradability using different approaches indicated that soluble protein in CMLP may supply a large amount of ammonia in the rumen while insoluble protein can be by-passed from microbial attacks due to its low degradability. The results from this study suggest that CMLP can be used as a protein supplement to ruminants for supplying both non-protein nitrogen to rumen microbes and rumen undegradable protein to the host animal.

Keywords

Cell Mass from Lysine Production;Ruminal Protein Degradability;Protein Fraction

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Rural Development Administration

References

  1. Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8:130-132.
  2. England, M. L., G. A. Broderick, R. D. Shaver and D. K. Combs. 1997. Comparison of in situ and in vitro techniques for measuring ruminal degradation of animal by-product proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2925-2931. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76258-1
  3. Broderick, G. A., N. De Leon and Y. Nakamura. 2000. Potential of fermentation byproducts as nitrogen supplements for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2548-2556. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75147-2
  4. Anupama and P. Ravindra. 2000. Value-added food: Single cell protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 18:459-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00045-8
  5. Bohnert, D. W., B. T. Larson, M. L. Bauer, A. F. Branco, K. R. McLeod, D. L. Harmon and G. E. Mitchell. 1999. Nutritional evaluation of poultry by-product meal as a protein source for ruminants: Small intestinal amino acid flow and disappearance in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1000-1007. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7741000x
  6. Kim, H. K., C. W. Kim, J. K. Ha and S. Y. Yang. 1997. Condensed molasses fermentation solubles from monosodium glutamate production as a liquid protein supplement for ruminants 1. Chemical composition and effects of different levels of CMS on the nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation in sheep. Kor. J. Anim. Nutr. Feed 21:207-218.
  7. Kellems, R. O., M. S. Aseltine and D. C. Church. 1981. Evaluation of single cell protein from pulp mills - laboratory analyses and in vivo digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 53:1601-1608. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.5361601x
  8. Johnson, D. E. and R. L. Remillard. 1983. Nutrient digestibility of brewers single cell protein. J. Anim. Sci. 56:735-739. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.563735x
  9. Hsu, J. C., T. W. Perry and M. T. Mohler. 1984. Utilization of potato-corn biosolids single-cell protein and potato-corn primary waste by beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1292-1299. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5851292x
  10. Hannon, K. and A. Trenkle. 1990. Evaluation of condensed molasses fermentation solubles as a nonprotein nitrogen source for ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2634-2641. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892634x
  11. France, J., M. S. Dhanoa, M. K. Theodorou, S. J. Lister, D. R. Davies and D. Isac. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. J. Theor. Biol. 163:99-111. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1109
  12. Ha, J. K., H. D. Kim, S. S. Shim, J. H. Lee, Y. G. Ko, B. O. Kwack, S. S. Lee, W. Y. Kim and I. K. Han. 1998. Studies on nutritive value of lysine fermentation by-product as a protein source for ruminants I. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 22:371-380.
  13. Fox, D. G., L. O. Tedeschi, T. P. Tylutki, J. B. Russell, M. E. Van Amburgh, L. E. Chase, A. N. Pell and T. R. Overton. 2004. The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 112:29-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006
  14. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. User's guide: Statistics, version 9th edn. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
  15. Orskov, E. R. and I. Mcdonald. 1979. Estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499- 503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  16. Menke, K. H. and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28:7-55.
  17. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  18. Liu, Z. J. and N. P. McMeniman. 2001. Effect of supplementation with a by-product of molasses fermentation or a non-protein nitrogen/mineral mix on feed intake and microbial protein supply in sheep consuming chopped oat (Avena sativa) hay. Small Rumin. Res. 41:229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00209-7
  19. Licitra, G., P. J. Van Soest, I. Schadt, S. Carpino and C. J. Sniffen. 1999. Influence of the concentration of the protease from streptomyces griseus relative to ruminal protein degradability. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 77:99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00233-8
  20. Licitra, G., F. Lauria, S. Carpino, I. Schadt, C. J. Sniffen and P. J. Van Soest. 1998. Improvement of the streptomyces griseus method for degradable protein in ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00178-8
  21. Licitra, G., T. M. Hernandez and P. J. VanSoest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:347-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  22. Lee, J. H., B. O. Kwack, H. D. Kim, S. S. Shim, Y. G. Ko, S. S. Lee, W. Y. Kim, J. K. Ha and I. K. Han. 1998. Studies on nutritive value of lysine fermentation by-product as a protein source for ruminants II. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 22:381-390.
  23. Krishnamoorthy, U., C. J. Sniffen, M. D. Stern and P. J. Vansoest. 1983. Evaluation of a mathematical model of rumen digestion and an in vitro simulation of rumen proteolysis to estimate the rumen undegraded nitrogen content of feedstuffs. Br. J. Nutr. 50:555-568. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19830127
  24. Kondo, Makoto, Kazumi Kita and Hiro-omi Yokota. 2007. Ensiled or oven-dried green tea by-product as protein feedstuffs: Effects of tannin on nutritive value in goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:880-886. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.880
  25. Zinn, R. A. and F. N. Owens. 1986. A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:157-166. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-017
  26. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  27. Wanapat, M., C. Promkot and S. Wanapat. 2006. Effect of cassoyurea pellet as a protein source in concentrate on ruminal fementation and digestibility in cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1004-1009. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1004
  28. Tilley, J. M. A. and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassland Soc. 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  29. Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd edn. Comstock Pub., Ithaca, NY, USA.
  30. Sniffen, C. J., J. D. Oconnor, P. J. Vansoest, D. G. Fox and J. B. Russell. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets .2. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562-3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
  31. Sedgman, C. A., J. H. B. Roy and J. Thomas. 1985a. Digestion, absorption and utilization of single-cell protein by the preruminant calf - abomasal outflow and its composition from calves given milk-substitute diets containing varying amounts of either bacterial or yeast protein. Br. J. Nutr. 53:673-689. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19850077
  32. Sedgman, C. A., J. H. B. Roy, J. Thomas, I. J. F. Stobo and P. Ganderton. 1985b. Digestion, absorption and utilization of single-cell protein by the preruminant calf - the true digestibility of milk and bacterial protein and the apparent digestibility and utilization of their constituent amino acids. Br. J. Nutr. 54:219-244. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19850107
  33. AOAC. 1984. Official methods of analysis. 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  34. Kumar, R., D. N. Kamra, Neeta Agarwal and L. C. Chaudhary. 2007. In vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of feeds containing oil seed cakes with rumen liquor of buffalo. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1196-1200. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1196
  35. Piao, X. S., Y. K. Han, S. H. Bae, H. Lee and I. K. Han. 1998. Evaluation of CM (cell mass from lysine fermentation) as an alternative protein source in broiler diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 11:550-558. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1998.550
  36. Russell, J. B., J. D. Oconnor, D. G. Fox, P. J. Vansoest and C. J. Sniffen. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets .1. Ruminal fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3551-3561. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113551x
  37. Schofield, P., R. E. Pitt and A. N. Pell. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2980- 2991. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x