Development of Instructional Activity Support Model for Capstone Design to Creative Engineering Education

창의적 공학교육을 위한 캡스톤 디자인(Capstone Design) 교수활동지원모형 개발

  • Received : 2008.02.14
  • Accepted : 2008.04.23
  • Published : 2008.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop instructional activity support model for capstone design in order for improving creative engineering education. To do this, having extracted the core idea of capstone design, and elicited core learning activity process, and grasped core supportive factors according to each core learning activity process that elicited, an improved instructional design model for capstone design was then developed through formative evaluation with respect to the draft of the instructional system development model for capstone design. As to major research methods, case analysis, requirements analysis through interview, and formative evaluation by experts were employed, and then research studies were undertaken. The formative evaluation by experts was carried out for two hours in 2007, and the experts participated in the evaluation consisted of total 6 persons: two specialists of capstone design contents, two professionals in field works, and two expert instructional designers in education engineering. Interview results had been reflected in this research when developing final instructional design model for capstone design. The core learning activity process of the final instructional design model for caption design, which developed in this research, comprises following stages: (1) Team building $\rightarrow$ (2) Integrated meeting between industry and academy $\rightarrow$ (3) Analysis of tasks $\rightarrow$ (4) Clarification of tasks $\rightarrow$(5) Seeking solutions for issues $\rightarrow$ (6) Eliciting priority of solutions $\rightarrow$ (7) Designing solutions and construction $\rightarrow$ (8) Exhibiting outcomes and presentation $\rightarrow$(9) Gaining comprehensive insights Also, in the core learning activity process, supportive factors that support implementation of each step were presented having been categorized into facilitator (teacher, and professionals in field works), learner and tool, etc.

References

  1. 교육공학용어사전 편찬위원회 편(2005). 교육공학용어사전, 서울 교육과학사
  2. 김영진(2006). 웹을 활용한 체험학습 교수설계 모형 개발 연구, 부산대학교대학원 박사학위논문
  3. 동아사이언스(2006). 디자인 교육의 새로운 바람을 일으키다, 동아사이언스(창의 세상)
  4. 멀티미디어교육지원센터(1998), 교육정보화백서
  5. 박병기(1998). 창의성 교육의 기반. 서울:교육과학사
  6. 박수홍.안영식.정주영(2005). 핵심역량강화를 위한 체계적 액션러닝 프로그램 개발, 교육정보미디어연구, 11(4)
  7. 산업자원부(2005). 서울대 등 7개대, '05년 창의적 설계인력양성 사업 신규참여 보도자료
  8. 서울산업대학교 Capstone Design 사업단(2005). Capstone Design 운영, Capstone Design운영 보고서, 서울산업대학교
  9. 설승기(2001). 공학교육 사례(창의적공학설계), 공학교육과 기술, 8(1)
  10. 송동주(2003). 공학교육의 문제점과 개선 방향에 대하여, 공학교육과 기술, 10(2)
  11. 이석순(2004). 경상대학교 Capstone Design 운영 방법과 문제점, 공학교육학회지, P. 305
  12. 이재열.이주영.김재필(2005). 서울대학교 시니어 캡스톤 프로그램 연구보고서, 서울대학교
  13. 정주영(2007). 블렌디드 액션러닝(Blended Action Learning) 지원시스템 개발, 부산대학교대학원 박사학위논문
  14. 조선대학교 첨단부품사업단(2005). [산업자원부] 서울대 등 7개대, '05년 창의적 설계 인력양성 사업 신규참여, 보도자료(2005. 5. 19)
  15. 한양대학교 산학협력중심대학 육성사업단(2006), 교육프로그램 소개, 한양대학교 홈페이지 (http://ieng.hanyang.ac.kr/indexA4.html)
  16. Akker, J, V. D.(1999) Principles and methods of development research. In Akker, J, D., Branch R. M. Kent, G., & Nieveen N. Plomp, T. (ebs.). Design approached and tools in education and training. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Acaedmic Publishers. 8-14
  17. Davis, Denny c., Mckenzie, Larry J., Trevisan, Michael S., Beyerlein, Steven W.(2004). Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A national S]tudy. American Society for Engineering Education
  18. Edward Lumsdaine, Monica Lumsdaine(1994). Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for A Changing World. Mcgraw-Hill College. 명지대학교 창의공학 연구회(역) (2001). 창의적 문제해결과 공학설계, 파워북
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550 https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
  20. Lincoln, Yvonna S., & Guba, Egon G.(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  21. Moore, P. D., Cupp, S.,& Fortenberry, N. L. (2004). Linking student learning outcomes to instructional practices-phase i. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City
  22. Murphy, P. D.(2003). Capstone experience. Retrieved January 3, 2004, from North Dakota State University Web site: http://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/accreditation/assessment/capstone_Experience.htm
  23. Osbom, A.(1963), Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribner's
  24. Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2005). Current development in creative problem solving for organization: A Focus on thinking skills and styles. The KOREA JOURNAL OF THINKING & PROBLEM SOLVING, 15(2), 43-76
  25. Reigeluth(1999) Instructional-design theories and models(A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
  26. Richey, R. C.(1986). The theoretual and conceptual based of instructional design. New York: Nichols Publishing Co
  27. Tan, Seng Chee(2000). Supporting collaborative problem-solving through computer-supported collaborative argumentation. The Pennsylvania State University
  28. Treffinger, D. J, Isaksen, S. G, & Dorval, K. B.(1994), Creativity Problem Solving: An Overview. In M. A. Runco. (Eds). NorWood. NJ: Ablex
  29. Wagenaar, T. C.(1993). The capstone course. Teaching Sociology, 21, 209-214 https://doi.org/10.2307/1319011