Gender Differences in Nasalance Scores in Korean Speaking Adults

비음측정기를 이용한 한국어를 사용하는 정상 성인에서 성별에 따른 비음도의 차이에 관한 연구

  • Kwon, Ho-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Song-Un (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Seok-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seok-Hyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 권호범 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과학교실 보철과) ;
  • 최송언 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과학교실 보철과) ;
  • 장석우 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과학교실 보존과) ;
  • 이석형 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과학교실 보철과)
  • Received : 2008.01.23
  • Accepted : 2008.03.25
  • Published : 2008.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain normative nasalance scores for adult subjects speaking the Korean language and to determine whether significantly different scores exist for female and male speakers. Mean nasalance scores were obtained for normal speaking Korean adults while they are reading vowels, consonants, no nasal sentence, mild nasal sentence, and high nasal sentence. Thirty adults who had lived in Seoul area with normal articulation, resonance, and voice were included. Among the subjects 15 were male aged 24-38 years and 15 were female aged 19-33. Nasometer data were collected and analyzed using the Kay Nasometer 6400. Nasalance scores were evaluated to investigate the effect of gender by using statistical tests. Nasalance data showed that nasalance values varied accroding to speech stimuli, and there was no significant difference in nasalance scores between male and female speakers in most of the language samples.

References

  1. Hirschberg J, Bok S, Juhasz M, Trenovszki Z, Votisky P, Hirschberg A. Adaptation of nasometry of Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr otorhinolaryngol 2006;70: 785-798 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.017
  2. Shin Ji Young. The basic pattern of speech. In: The understanding of speech. Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa; 2000:163-231
  3. Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715-721 https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.715
  4. Hutchinson JM, Robinson K, Nerbonne MA. Patterns of nasalance in a sample of gerodontologic subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715-721 https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.715
  5. Leeper H, Rochet A, MacKay I, Adams I. A study of nasometric values for normal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715-721 https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.715
  6. Sprintzen RJ. Instrumental assessment of velopharyngeal valving. In: Sprintzen RJ, Bardach J.(eds) Cleft palate speech management: A multidiscipilinary approach. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995:221-256
  7. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Installation, operations, and maintenance manual of the Nasometer II Model 6400. Lincoln Park, NJ 07035-1488 USA1994
  8. Dalston R, Neiman G, Gonzalez-Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 1993;30:285-291 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0285:NSASAC>2.3.CO;2
  9. Fletcher SG. nasalance vs. listener judgements of nasality. Cleft palate J. 1976;13:31-44
  10. Dalston R, Waren D, Dalston E. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991:28(2):184-188 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0184:UONAAD>2.3.CO;2
  11. Watterson T, Lewis KE, Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech. Cleft Palate craniofac J. 1998;35:293-298 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1998)035<0293:NANILP>2.3.CO;2
  12. Kavanagh M, Fee E, Kalinowski J, Doyle P, Leeper H. Nasometric values for three dialectal groups within the Atlantic provinces of Canada. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1994;18:7-13
  13. Anderson R. Nasometric values for normal Spanish- speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:333-336 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0333:NVFNSS>2.3.CO;2
  14. Nichols A. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:57-63 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1999)036<0057:NSFTMP>2.3.CO;2
  15. Tachimura T, Mori C, Hirata S, Wada T. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of mid-west Japanese Dialect. Cleft palate Craniofac J 2000;37:463-467 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2000)037<0463:NSVINA>2.0.CO;2
  16. Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunayaku A, Rengpatanak K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;27:351-5
  17. Van Lierde KM, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:12-118
  18. Kim SI, Baik JA, Shin HK, Kim OH. Study of nasalance for normal Korean adults using Nasometer II. Speech Science. 2000;7(3):219-228
  19. Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo CM. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:143-149 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0143:NANAVC>2.3.CO;2
  20. Watterson T, Lewis K, Brancamp T. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6200 and the Nasometer II 6400. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2005;42(5):574-579 https://doi.org/10.1597/04-017.1
  21. Benninger MS. Medical disorders in the vocal artist. In: Vocal arts medicine. Benninger MS, Jacobson BH, Johnson AF (eds). New York: Thieme medical publishers, Inc.; 1994:177-215
  22. Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: A prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:139-144
  23. Park KT, Kwon HB. The evaluation of the use of a delayed surgical obturator in dentate maxillectomy patients by considering days elapsed prior to commencement of postoperative oral feeding. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:446-453
  24. Mishima K, Suchii A, Yamada T, et al. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. Journal of cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2007;doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2007.07.008
  25. Goozee J, Murdoch B, Theodoros D, Thompson E. The effects of age and gender on laryngeal aerodynamics. Int J lang Commun Disord 998;33: 221-238 https://doi.org/10.1080/136828298247884
  26. McKerns D, Bzoch KR. Variations in velophayngeal valving: the factor of sex. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:652-662
  27. Litzaw LL, Dalston RM. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. J Commun Disord. 1992;25(1):55-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(92)90014-N
  28. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. A preliminary investigation concerning the use of nasometry in identifying patients with hyponasality and/or nasal airway impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1991;34:11-18 https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3401.11
  29. Gildersleeve-Neumann CE, Dalston RM. Nasalance scores in noncleft individuals: why not zero? Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2001;38(2):190-111