Mandibular Implant-Supported Telescopic Overdenture using Gold Electroforming System : A Case Report

Gold Electroforming System을 이용한 하악 임플란트 지지 텔레스코프 피개의치

  • Choi, Jee-Ha (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Byoung-Il (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 최지하 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김승균 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 유병일 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박주미 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2008.03.23
  • Accepted : 2008.06.25
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

In edentulous mandible, implant supported overdenture was considered as a first treatment option. In case of a implant supported telescopic overdenture, sufficient inter-arch space needs for arrangement of artificial teeth and attachment. Passive fit of the implant prosthesis is important factor for preventing mechanical failure. Gold Electroforming System is particularly useful to achieve a passive fit of telescopic attachment and results in precision marginal fit and the small thickness of the coping provides optimal space for narrow inter-arch space. This article presents that application of Gold Electroforming System can provide excellent esthetics and function on four-implant supported telescopic overdenture.

References

  1. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 11th ed. St Louis; Mosby;1997
  2. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction ofo the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed longitudinal study covering 25years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  3. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(4):601-2
  4. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:181-186
  5. Greven B, Luepke M, von Dorsche SH. Telescoping implant prostheses with intraoral luted galvano mesostructures to improve passive fit. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:239-244 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60062-6
  6. Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann M, Weber HP. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:560- 569 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x
  7. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA. Comparison of implant retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: A 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:879-885
  8. Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Stehenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: Peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:695-702
  9. Meijer H.J.A, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM & Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implant: Influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:96 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-J
  10. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Bosman F & Steen WH. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:147 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01598.x
  11. Heckmann SM, Winter M, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann M. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part II: A methodical study using five types of attchments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:640-647 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120613.x
  12. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Krainhofner M & Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: A 3-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:164-170
  13. Besimo CH, Kempf B. In vitro investigation of various attachments for overdentures on osseointegrated implants. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:691-698 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01068.x
  14. Rogers OW, Armstrong BW. Electroforming a gold matrix for indirect inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:959-966 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90156-1
  15. Setz J, Diehl J, Weber H. The marginal fit of cemented galvanoceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:61-64