Photoelastic Stress Analysis of Single Implant Restoration According to Implant Fixture Size and Abutment Diameter

단일치 임플란트에서 고정체와 지대주 직경의 차이에 따른 광탄성 응력 분석

  • Lee, Jin-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 이진한 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2008.05.06
  • Accepted : 2008.09.25
  • Published : 2008.09.30


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern and the magnitude of stress distribution in the supporting tissues surrounding implant fixture with different diameter of implant fixtures(3i implant, Ø4.0, Ø5.0, Ø6.0mm and UCLA abutments(Ø4.1, Ø5.0, Ø6.0mm using photoelastic stress analysis. Photoelastic model was made with PL-2 resin(Measurements Group, Raleigh, USA) and three implants of each diameter were placed in the mandibular posterior edentulous area distal to the canine. Individual crowns were fabricated using UCLA abutments. Photoelastic stress analysis was carried out to measure the fringe order around the implant supporting structure under simulated loading conditions(15 lb, 30 lb). The results were as follows; 1. The more the diameter of implant fixture was increased, the less the stress concentration on cervical area of fixture was observed under loading. 2. Increasing mesiodistal diameter of implant superstructure had no much influence on stress distribution around implant fixture. 3. The use of smaller abutment had no influence on stress distribution around implant fixture. The use of smaller abutment diameter than that of implant fixture had no favorable effect on implant supporting tissue at biomechanical consideration.


Supported by : 원광대학교


  1. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T. Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implant for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(4): 450-455
  2. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 546-549
  3. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching : A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26: 9-17
  4. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Tiziano T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005; 17(10): 735-740
  5. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: Literature support. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 108-116
  6. Lemons JE, Phillips RW. Biomaterials for dental implants. In Misch CE, editor : Contemporary implant dentistry, St Louis, Mosby 1993; 262
  7. Piatelli A, Ruggeri A, Franchi M. An histologic and histomorphometric studyof bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-submerged single implants in monkeys: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol. 1993; 19: 314-319
  8. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I. Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues: a study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3: 9-16
  9. Wallace SS. Significance of the biologic width with respect to root form implants. Dent Implantol Update. 1994; 5: 25-29
  10. Jung ES, Jo KH, Lee CH. A finite element stress analysis of the bone around implant following cervical bone resorption. J Korean Academy of Implant Destistry. 2003; 22: 38-47
  11. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto- gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J periodonol. 1997; 68: 186-198
  12. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reaction in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 22(3): 255-261
  13. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25
  14. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (1):a 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1986;15: 39-52
  15. Jung JW, Lee CH. The effect of the difference of the implant fixture and abutment diameter for stress distribution. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. 2004; 42: 583-596
  16. Braun S, Bantleon HP, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Johnson BE. A study of bite force, part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(5): 367-372
  17. Gardner DM. Maintaining crestal bone around dental implant. literature review and clinical technique. Dent Today. 2006; 25(3): 76, 78-79
  18. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberq B, Thomsen P.The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991; 2(2): 81-90
  19. Wallace S, Tarnow D. The biologic width around implants. Proceedings of the International Congress of Oral Implantologists, Oct 1995, Munich, Germany
  20. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimention of the peri-implant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 971-973
  21. Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porus rooted dental implant. J Dent Res. 1976; 55: 772-777
  22. Xavier VN, Xavier RC, Carlos RA, Maribel ST. Benefits of an implantplatform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dentistry. 2006; 15(3): 313-320
  23. Sullivan DY. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1): 39-45
  24. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50: 399-410
  25. Scott I, Ash MM Jr. A six-channel intraoral transmitter for measuring occlusal forces. J Prosthet Dent. 1966; 16(1): 56-61
  26. Kim YS, Kim CW, Jang KS, Lim YJ. Application of finite element analysis to evaluate platform switching. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. 2005;43: 727-735
  27. Kwon JH, Choi MH, Kim YL, Cho HW. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of single implant restoration using different fixture and abutment screw diameters. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. 2005; 43:105-119
  28. Cehrell M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2004; 15: 249-257
  29. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants : considerations based on a three dimentional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 401-12
  30. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE : Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res. 1977; 85: 200-208
  31. Adell R, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated edentulous jaw. J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416
  32. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. NY State Dent J. 2005; 71: 34-37
  33. Major MS. Wheeler's dental anatomy. physilogy and occlusion: 7th ed. WB Saunders Co 1993; 218-231
  34. Misch CE. Early crestal bone loss etiology and its effect on treatment planning for implants. Postgrad Dent. 1995; 2: 3-17
  35. Kim YS, OH TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal consideration in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2005; 16: 26-35
  36. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss : Myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002; 73: 322-333
  37. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 1372-1383