생물측정학-멘델주의 논쟁에 대한 통계학사적 고찰

Jo, Jae-Keun

  • 발행 : 2008.05.30


생물측정학-멘델주의 논쟁은 다윈이 주장한 생물 진화의 연속성과 자연선택을 두고 1890년대 중반부터 약 10여년간 치열하게 진행되었던 논쟁이다. 본 연구에서는 생물학이 아니라 통계학에 중점을 두고 논쟁의 진행과정을 살펴보았다. 특히 수학자이던 피어슨이 생물학 자료에 대해 통계학을 연구하게된 배경, The Grammar of science에 나타나는 그의 과학철학과 논쟁에서 나타나는 피어슨의 입장, 그리고 그의 입장과 1830년대 이후 영국 통계학 전통 사이의 관계도 살펴보았다. 결과적으로 이 논쟁을 계기로 피어슨의 많은 통계학 연구가 나오게 되었고 처음으로 연구자들이 결집하게 되었으며 새로운 학술지 Biometrka가 창간되었음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 이 논쟁은 우생학과 더불어 수학적인 통계학이 대학에 자리잡는 촉매제로 작용하였다.


상관관계와 인과관계;멘델주의;생물측정학;진화와 유전학


  1. 베르나르 클로드(1985). <실험의학방법론>, 유석진 옮김, 대광문화사, 서울; Bernard,C. (1865). Introduction al'etude de la medecine experimentale
  2. 스티글러 스티븐 (2005).<통계학의 역사>, 조재근 옮김, 한길사, 파주, 경기도; Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  3. Yule, G. U. (1932). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 10th ed., Charles Gri$\pm$n and Company, London
  4. Reid, C. (1982). Neyman - From Life, Springer, New York
  5. Rushton, A. R. (2000). Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context, Journal of the History of Medicine, 55, 134-157
  6. Statistical Society of London (1838), Introduce, fourth annal report of the council of the ststistical society of London, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 1, 1-13
  7. Stigler, S. M. (2005). Fisher in 1921, Statistical Science, 20, 32-49
  8. Sturtevant, A. H. (1965). A History of Genetics, Harper and Row, New York
  9. Weldon, W. F. R. (1893). On certain correlated variation in Carcinus maenas, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 54, 318-329
  10. Weldon, W. F. R. (1894). The study of animal variation, Nature, 50, 24-26
  11. Yates, F. and Mather, K. (1963). Ronald Aylmer Fisher 1890-1962: Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London, available form the R. A. Fisher Digital Archive, University of Adelaide
  12. Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, III. Re- gression, heredity and panmixia, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Serise A, 187, 253-318
  13. Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling, Philosophical Magazine, series 5, 157-175 (reprinted in Breakthroughs in Statistics: Volume 2, edited by Samuel Kotz and Norman L. Johnson, Springer, New York, 1993, 11-28)
  14. Pearson, K. (1914-1930). The Life, Letters, and Labours of Francis Galton, Cambridge University Press, London
  15. Porter, T. M. (1986). The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820-1900, Princeton University Press, Princeton
  16. Porter, T. M. (2004). Karl Pearson: the Scientific Life in a Statistical Age, Princeton University Press, Princeton
  17. Provine, W. B. (1971). The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  18. Magnello, M. E. (1998). Karl Pearson's mathematization of inheritance: From ancestral heredity to mendelian genetics (1895-1909), Annals of Science, 55, 35-94
  19. Magnello, M. E. (2005). Karl Pearson and the origins of modern statistics: An Elastician becomes a statistician, The Rutherford Journal, 1,
  20. Mendel, G. (1866). Experiments in Plant - Hybridisation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  21. Morrell, J. and Thackray, A. (1981). Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Clarendon Press (Oxford University), Oxford
  22. Olby, R. C. (1966). Origins of Mendelism, Constable, London
  23. Pearson, E. S. (1936). Karl Pearson: An appreciation of some aspects of his life and work, Biometrika, 28, 193-257
  24. Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science, Walter Scott, London ($2^{nd} $ed., 1900; 3rd ed., 1911; Everyman's Library ed., 1937)
  25. Pearson, K. (1895). Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution-II. Skew variation in homogeneous material, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Serise A, 186, 343-414
  26. Kim, K. M. (1994). Explaining Scientific Consensus: the Case of Mendelian Genetics, The Guilford Press, New York
  27. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (1936). Obituary: Professor Karl Pearson, F.R.S., 1857-1936, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 99, 424-428
  28. Klein, J. L. (1997). Statistical Visions in Time: A History of Time Series Analysis 1662-1938, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  29. MacKenzie, D. A. (1981). Statistics in Britain 1865-1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
  30. Bateson, W. (1928b). Scientific Papers of William Bateson, Edited by R. C. Punnett, 1, 29-68, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  31. Bowler, P. J. (2003). Evolution: The History of an Idea, 3rd edition, University of California Press, California
  32. Edwards, A. W. F. (2003). R. A. Fisher twice professor of genetics: London and Cambridge or 'A fairly well-known geneticist'. The Statistician, 52, 311-318
  33. Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399- 433
  34. Fisher, R. A. (1924). The biometrical study of heredity, Eugenics Review, 16, 189-210
  35. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  36. Fisher, R. A. (1952). Statistical methods in genetics, Heredity, 6, 1-12
  37. Hald, A. (1981). T. N. Thiele's contribution to statistics, International Statistical Review, 49, 1-20
  38. Hald, A. (1998). A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  39. Hilts, V. L. (1981). Statist and Statistician, Arno Press, New York
  40. Bateson, W. (1901). Heredity, differentiation and other conceptions of biology: A consideration of professor Karl Pearson's paper 'On the principle of homotyposis', In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 69, 193-205, (Reprinted in Bateson,1928b, 404-418)
  41. Bateson, W. (1904a). Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity, Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, II, 1-131
  42. Bateson, W. (1904b). Presidential address to the zoological section, british association: Cambridge meeting, 1904, in Beatrice Bateson, (Reprinted in Bateson, 1928a), 233-259
  43. Bateson, W. (1913). Mendel's Principles of Heredity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  44. Bateson, W. (1928a). William Bateson, F. R. S. Naturalist: His Essays & Addresses To- gether with a Short Account of His Life by Beatrice Bateson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  45. 헤니그 로빈 (2006). <정원의 수도사>, 안인희 옮김, 사이언스북스, 서울; Henig, R. M. (2000). The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. Houghton Mifflin
  46. Aldrich, J. (1995). Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Yule, Statistical Science, 10, 364-376
  47. Barnard, G. A. (1993). Introduction by G. A. Barnard, in Breakthroughs in Statistics: Volume 2: Methodology and Distribution, Edited by Samuel Kotz and Norman L. Johnson, Springer, New York, 1-10
  48. Bateson, W. (1894). Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species, Macmillan & Company, London, (Reprinted in Bateson, 1928b, 211-312)
  49. Hald, A. (2000). The early history of the cumulants and the Gram-Charlier series, International Statistical Review, 68, 137-153
  50. Morrison, M. (2002). Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and biometry, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 39-68
  51. Pearson, K. (1894). Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Londos, Serise A, 185, 71-110
  52. Pearson, K. (1901). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution IX: On the principle of homotyposis and its relation to heredity, to the variability of the in- dividual and to that of the race. Part I. homotypos in the vegetable kingdom, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Serise A, 197, 285-379
  53. Pearson, K. (1902). On the fundamental conceptions of biology, Biometrika, 1, 320-344