Potential Methane Production on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste

DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shin, Joung-Du;Park, Sang-Won;Kim, Sang-Hyoun;Duangmanee, Jack;Lee, Po-Heng;Sung, Shi-Hwu;Lee, Bong-Hoon

  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and food waste for biogas production was performed in serum bottles at various volatile solids(VS) contents and mixing ratios of two substrates(swine manure:food waste=$100:0{\sim}0:100$). Through kinetic mode of surface methodology, the methane production was fitted to a Gompertz equation. The ultimate methane production potential of swine manure alone was lower than that of food waste regardless of VS contents. However, it was appeared that maximum methane production potentials in 80 : 20 of the mixing rate at VS 3% was enhanced at 144.7%, compared to its only swine manure. The potential increased up to 815.71 ml/g VS fed as VS concentration and food composition increased up to 3.0% and 20%, respectively. The ultimate amount of methane produced had significantly a positive relationship with that of methane yield rate. Overall, it would be strongly recommended that feeding stocks use 20% of mixing ratio of food waste based on VS 3% contents when operating the anaerobic reactor on site at $35^{\circ}C$ if not have treatment of its anaerobic waste water.

키워드

Anaerobic co-digestion;Cumulative methane yield;Gompertz equation;Swine manure;Food waste;Methane production

참고문헌

  1. Ghosh, S., Conrad, J.R., Klass, D.L. (1975) Anaerobic acidogenesis of wastewater sludge. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 47(1); 30-45
  2. Hawkes, F.R. and Hawkes, D.L. (1987) Anaerobic digestion. In: Bu'lock, J., Kristiansen, B.(Eds.), Basic Biotechnology, Academic Press, London, pp. 337-358
  3. Callaghan, F.J., Wase, D.A.J., Thayanithy, K., Forster, C.F. (2002) Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass and Bioenergy 27; 71-77
  4. Classen, P.A.M., van Lier, J.B., Lopez Contreras, A.M., van Niel E.W., Sijtsma, J., Stams, A.J.M., de Vries, S.S., Weusthuis, R.A. (1999) Utilization of biomass for the supply of energy carriers. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 52; 741-755 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051586
  5. Forordning (2001: 512)om deponering av avfall, http:/www. notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/ 200105012htm. (5/31/02, 2001)
  6. Ministry of Environment. 2002. The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2001. Seoul, Korea
  7. Ministry of Environment. (2005) The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005. Seoul, Korea
  8. Han S-K and Shin H-S. (2002) Enhanced acidogenic fermentation of food waste in continuous-flow reactor. Waste Manage Res 2002; 20:110-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0202000202
  9. Schafter PL and Farrel JB. (2000) Advanced anaerobic digestion systems. Water Environ Technol 12(11); 26-32
  10. APHA AWWA WEF. (1988) Standard methods for the examination of waster and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC, USA; APAH
  11. Momirlan M and Veziroglu T. (1999) Recent directions of world hydrogen production. Renew Sust Energy Rev 3: 219-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00017-3
  12. Yang K, Yu Y and Hwang S. (2003) Selective optimization in thermophilic acidogenesis of cheesewhey wastewater to acetic and butyric acids: partial acidification and methanation. Water Res 37; 2467-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00006-X
  13. Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy Jr JB, Young LY, McCarty PL. (1979) Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 13; 485-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
  14. Momirlan M, Veziroglu T. (1999) Recent directions of world hydrogen production. Renew Sust. Energy Rev(3); 219-31
  15. Lay J-J. (2001) Bio-hydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 74(4): 280-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.1118
  16. Lethtomaki A, S. Huttunen and J. A. Rintala. (2006) Laboratory investigation on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources Conservation & Recycling. pp. 1-19
  17. van Lier, J.B., Tilche, E., Ahring, B.K., Macarie, H., Moletta, R., Dohanyos, M. (2001) New perspectives in anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology 43(1); 1-18
  18. Lafitte-Trouque S and Forster CF. (2000) Dual anaerobic co-digestion of swage sludge and confectionery waste. Bioresource Technol 71: 77-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00043-7
  19. Chae K. J, Am Jang, S. K. Yim and In S. Kim. (2008) The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresource technol 99; 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.063
  20. Lee YJ, Miyahara T and Noike T. (2001) Effect of iron concentration on hydrogen fermentation. Bioresource Technol 80: 227-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00067-0
  21. Chen C-C, Lin C-Y and Lin M-C. (2002) Acid-based enrichment enchances anaerobic hydrogen production process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58: 224-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100814