Distributed Hybrid Simulation and Testing System using General-Purpose Finite Element Analysis Program

범용 유한요소해석 프로그램을 이용한 분산 공유 하이브리드 해석 및 실험 시스템

  • 윤군진 (Washington University 기계항공구조공학과) ;
  • 한봉구 (서울산업대학교 건설공학부)
  • Published : 2008.02.28


In this paper, a software framework that integrates computational and experimental simulation has been developed to simulate and test a large-scale structural system under earthquake loading. The proposed software framework does not need development of the computer codes for both dynamic and static simulations. Any general-purpose software can be utilized with a main control module and interface APIs. This opens up a new opportunity to facilitate use of sophisticated finite elements into hybrid simulation regime to enhance accuracy and efficiency of simulations. The software framework described in the paper is modular and uses object oriented programming concepts. A series of illustrative examples demonstrate that the system is fully-functional and is capable of running any number of experimental and/or analytical components.


  1. Guyan, R.J. (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA Jounral, 3, p.380 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2874
  2. Kagawa, T., Sato, M., Minowa, C., Abe, A., Tazoh, T. (2004) Centrifuge Simulations of Large- Scale Shaking Table Tests: Case Studies, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130, pp.663-672 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(663)
  3. Yun, G.J., Ghaboussi, J., Elnashai, A.S. (2006) Development of neural network based hysteretic models for steel beam-column connections through self-learning simulation, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Accepted
  4. He, L. (2005) Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading and Its Effects on Pile Foundations, PhD Thesis Department of Structural Engineering University of California, San Diego
  5. Kwon, O.S., Nakata, N., Elnashai, A.S., Spencer, B. (2005) A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9, pp.741-753 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002158
  6. Elnashai, A.S., Papanikolaou, V., Lee, D.H. (2002) eds. ZEUS NL, A Program of the Inelastic Dynamic Analysis of Space Frames. Vol. User Manual. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  7. Mahin, Stephen, A., Shing, P.B. (1985) Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing, Journal of Structural Engineering, 111, pp.1482-1503 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1482)
  8. Shing, P.B., Mahin Stephen, A. (1985) Computational Aspects of a Seismic Performance Test Method using On-line Computer Control, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 13, pp.507-526 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130406
  9. Elnashai, A., Spencer, B.F., Kuchma, D., Hashash, Y., Ghaboussi, J., Gan, G. (2004) Multiaxial full-scale sub-structured testing and simulation (MUST-SIM) facility at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, BC Canada
  10. Nakashima, M., Kaminosono, T., Ishida, M., Ando,. K. (1990) Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test, 4th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, CA, pp.515-524
  11. Irons, B. (1965) Structural eigenvalue problems: Elimination of unwanted variables, AIAA Jounral, 3, pp.961-962
  12. Spencer, B., Elnashai, A., Kuchma, D., Abrams, D. (2004) NEESGrid Multi-site online simulation test (MOST) at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC Canada
  13. Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S., Plesha, M.E., Witt, R.J. (2001) Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. John Wile &Sons Inc
  14. Ghaboussi, J., Yun, G.J., Hashash, Y.M.A. (2006) A Novel Predictor-Corrector algorithm for substructure pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35, pp.453-476 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.540
  15. ABAQUS/Standard HKS (2004) A General Purpose Finite Element Code. Karlsson & Sorense, Inc: Hibbitt
  16. Wang, T., Nakashima, M., Pan, P. (2006) On-line hybrid test combining with general-purpose finite element software, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, pp.1471-1488 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.586
  17. Takahashi, Y., Fenves, G.L. (2006) Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, pp.267-291 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.518
  18. Craig, J.R., Bampton, M.C.C. (1968) Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analysis, AIAA Jounral, 6, pp.1313-1319 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4741
  19. Yun, G.J., Ghaboussi, J., Elnashai, A.S. (2007) A New Neural Network-based Model for Hysteretic Behavior of Materials, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering In Press
  20. Hashash, Y., Yun, G.J., Ghaboussi, J., Elnashai, A. (2004) Integrated Computational and Experimental Simulation Framework, User Manual, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana
  21. Yun, G.J., Ghaboussi, J., Elnashai, A.S. (2007) Self-learning Simulation Method for Inverse Nonlinear Modeling of Cyclic Behavior of Connections, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering Accepted