Sustainable Value for the Sustainability Evaluation of Corporate: Focused on Evaluation based on Sustainability Report

지속가능성보고서를 토대로 한 기업 지속가능가치평가

  • 남상민 (동명대학교 유통경영학과)
  • Published : 2009.10.28


This research proposes a new approach to measure corporate contributions to sustainability called Sustainable Value. With some global corporations which recognize the seriousness of environmental crisis and their social responsibility, enterprises are positively accepting the sustainable management. Also, publication of the sustainability report is proliferating which is showing the enterprise's strategy, activity, result and influence in environmental, economic, social cases to the stakeholder. However, to settle and proliferate this current, it rests with how to evaluate enterprises sustainability in reasonable and reliable figure. In this context, what introduced and taking effects are sustainability report evaluation and awarding system. But the quality of sun stainability report and its content's depth and the evaluation of enterprise's sustainability itself should be distinguished. Because the enterprise which published excellent graded sustainability report is not always the enterprise that is sustainable. Then, how could we prove the result of enterprise's sustainable management based on sustainability report? This paper is to find the answer and to utilize it based on sustainability report, particularly sustainable value model as the central figure.


Sustainability Management;Sustainability Reporting;Sustainable Value;Sustainability Performance Evaluation


  1. 남상민, "환경보고서 시상체계의 국제비교 및 시상을 위한 평가방법론에 관한 탐색적 연구", 대한경영학회지, 제17권, 제6호, pp.2739-2763, 2004.
  2. ACCA, Towards transparency: progress on global sustainability reporting, London, 2004.
  3. G. Atkinson, "Measuring Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol.43, No.2, pp.235-252, 2000.
  4. P. Bartelmus, "Accounting for Sustainable Growth and Development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol.3, No.2, pp.241-260, 1992.
  5. J. Clausen, T. Loew, K. Klaffke, M. Raupach, and I. Schoenheit, The lNEM(International Network for Environmental Management) Sustainability Reporting Guide, IOEW : IMUG, 2001.
  6. R. Costanza, H. Daly, and J. Bartholomew, Goals, Agenda and Policy Recommendations for Ecological Economics, in: R. Costanza(Hrsg.), Ecological Economics. The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University Press, pp.1-20, 1991.
  7. H. Daly, "Towards Some Operational Principles of Sustainable Development," Ecological Economics, Vol.2, No.1, pp.1-6, 1990.
  8. H. Daly, "On Wilfred Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Development," Environmental Values, Vol.4, No.2, pp.49-55, 1995.
  9. T. Dyllick and K. Hockerts, "Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.11, No.2, pp.130-141, 2002.
  10. F. Figge and T. Hahn, "Sustainable Value Added - ein neues $Ma{\beta}$ des Nachhaltigkeitsbeitrags von Unternehmen am Beispiel der Henkel KGaA," Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, Vol.73, No.1, pp.126-141, 2004I.
  11. F. Figge and T. Hahn, "Sustainable Value Added - Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency," Ecological Economics, Vol.48, No.2, pp.173-187, 2004ll.
  12. M. Freeman, R. Haveman, and A. Kneese, The Economics of Environmental Policy, John Wiley & Sons, 1973.
  13. GRI(Global Reporting Initiative), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2002, 2006.
  14. N. Hanley, "Macroeconomic Measures of Sustainability," Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol.14, No.1, pp.1-30, 2000.
  15. M. Harte, "Ecology, Sustainability, and Environment as Capital," Ecological Economics, Vol.15, No.2, pp.157-164, 1995.
  16. J. Hartwick, "Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources," American Economic Review 67, pp.972-974, 1977.
  17. F. Neumayer, Weak versus Strong sustainability, Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Elgar, 1999.
  18. B. Norton and M. Toman, "Sustainability: Ecological and Economic Perspectives," Land Economics, Vol.73, No.4, pp.553-568, 1997.
  19. Ostereichisches Institut fur Nachhaltige Entwicklung, Reporting about Sustainability - in 7 Schritten zum Nachhaltigkeitsbericht, 2003.
  20. D. Pearce, "Economics, Equity and sustainable Development," Futures, Vol.20, No.6, pp.598-605, 1988.
  21. D. Pearce and G. Atkinson, "The concept of sustainable development: an evaluation of its usefulness ten years after Brundtland," Swiss Journal of Economic and Statistics 134, pp.251-269, 1998.
  22. T. Prugh, R. Costanza, J. Cumberland, H. Daly, R. Goodland, and R. Norgaard, Natural Capital and Human Economic Survival, 2nd ed. Lewis Publishers, 1999.
  23. N. Roome, Sustainability Strategies for Industry: The Future of Corporate Practice, Island Press, 1998.
  24. S. Schaltegger and A. Sturm, "Okologische Rationalitat: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausstaltung von okologieorientierten Managementsinstrumenten," Die Unternehmung, Vol.44, No.4, pp. 273-290, 1999.
  25. R. Solow, "On the Intertemporal Allocation of Natural Resources," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol.88, No.1, pp.141-149, 1986.
  26. V. Stahlmann, "Oko-Effizienz und Oko-Effektivitat. Lasst sich der Umweltfortschritt eines Unternehmens messen?" Umweltwirtschaftsforum 4, pp.70-76, 1996.
  27. A. Steer and E. Lutz, Measuring environmentally sustainable development. In: I. Serageldin & A. Eteer(Eds.), Making Development Sustainable, From Concepts to Action. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, pp.17-20, 1994.
  28. D. Stern, "The Capital Theory Approach to Sustainability: A Critical Appraisal," Journal of Economics Issues, Vol.1, No.1, pp.145-173, 1997.
  29. A. Ullmann, From Eco-Efficiency to Eco-Effectiveness, Prolegomena to a Gaian Theory of Strategic Management, Academy of Management Interactive Paper Upload System, Paper 31761, 2001.