Effect of Butyric Acid on Performance, Gastrointestinal Tract Health and Carcass Characteristics in Broiler Chickens

DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Panda, A.K.;Rama Rao, S.V.;Raju, M.V.L.N.;Shyam Sunder, G.

  • 투고 : 2008.05.22
  • 심사 : 2008.07.23
  • 발행 : 2009.07.01

초록

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of graded levels of butyric acid (butyrate) on performance, gastrointestinal tract health and carcass characteristics in young broiler chickens. Control starter (0-3 wk) and finisher (4-5 wk) diets were formulated to contain 2,900 kcal ME/kg and 22% CP, and 3,000 kcal ME/kg and 20% CP, respectively. Subsequently, four other experimental diets were formulated to contain 0.05% antibiotic (furazolidone) or 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6% butyric acid. Each diet was fed at random to 8 replicates of 6 chicks each throughout the experimental period (0-5 wk). The results showed that 0.4% butyrate in the diet was similar to antibiotic in maintaining body weight gain and reducing E. coli numbers but superior for feed conversion ratio. No added advantage on these parameters was obtained by enhancing the concentration of butyrate from 0.4 to 0.6% in the diet. Feed intake and mortality were not influenced by the dietary treatments. A reduction in pH of the upper GI tract (crop, proventiculus and gizzard) was observed by inclusion of butyrate in the diets of broilers compared to either control or antibiotic-fed group. Butyrate at 0.4% was more effective in reducing the pH than 0.2% butyrate. Within the lower GI tract, 0.4 and 0.6% butyrate was effective in lowering pH in the duodenum, but no effect was found in either the jejunum or ileum. The villus length and crypt depth in the duodenum increased significantly in all the butyrate treated diets irrespective of the level tested. Carcass yield was higher and abdominal fat content was lower significantly in all the butyrate treatment groups compared to the control or antibiotic group. From these findings, it is concluded that 0.4% butyric acid supplementation maintained performance, intestinal tract health, and villi development and carcass quality in broiler chickens.

키워드

Butyric Acid;Performance;GI Tract Health;Carcass Characteristics;Broiler Chickens

참고문헌

  1. American Public Health Association. 1984. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. $2^{nd}$ edn. (Ed.) Washington DC
  2. Calnek, B. W., H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, W. M. Reid and H. W. Yoder, Jr. 1991. Diseases of Poultry, $9^{th}$ edn. (Ames, Iowa State University Press)
  3. Izat, A. L., N. M. Tidwell, R. A. Thomas, M. A. Reiber, M. H. Adams, M. Colberg and P. W. Waldroup. 1990. Effects of a buffered propionic acid in details on the performance of broiler chickens and on microflora of the intestine and carcass. Poult. Sci. 69:818-826 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690818
  4. Pinchasov, Y. and L. S. Jensen. 1989. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on voluntary feed intake of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 68:1612-1618 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0681612
  5. Seto, F. 1981. Early development of the avian immune system. Poult. Sci. 60:1981-1995 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0601981
  6. Van Immerseel, F., V. Fievez, J. De Buck, F. Pasmans, A. Martel, F. Haesebrouk and R. Ducatelle. 2004. Microencapsulated shortchain fatty acids in feed modify colonization and invasion early after infection with Salmonella enteritidis in young chickens. Poult. Sci. 83:69-74
  7. Leeson, S., H. Namkung, M. Antongiovanni and E. H. Lee. 2005. Effect of butric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 84:1418-1422
  8. Bolton, W. and W. A. Dewar. 1965. The digestibility of acetic, propionic and butyric acid by the fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 6:103-105 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071666508415562
  9. Lesson, S. 2007. Butyratelancing science versus societal issues in poultry nutrition. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (B). 71:1-5
  10. Yang, P., P. A. Iji and M. Choct. 2007. Effects of different dietary levels of mannan oligosaccharide on growth performance and gut development of broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1084-1091
  11. Antongiovanni, M., A. Buccioni, F. Petacchi, S. Leeson, S. Minieri, A. Martini and R. Cecchi. 2007. Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: effects on gut histology and carcass composition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6:19-25
  12. Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin.1997. Probitics in poultry : modes of action. World's Poult. Sci. J. 53:351-368 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19970028
  13. Dibner, J. J. and R. J. Buttin. 2002 .Use of organic acids as a model to study the impact of Gut microflora in nutrition and metabolism J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:453:463
  14. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH. Publishing Company, New Delhi
  15. Van der wielen, P. 2000. Dietary strategies to influence the gastrointestinal microflora of young animals and its potential to improve intestinal health. pp. 37-60 in Nutrition and Health of the Gastrointestinal Tract. M.C. Blok, H.A
  16. Culling, C. F. A. 1963. Hand book of histopathological techniques. 11edn.
  17. Van Immerseel, F., F. Boyen, I. Gantois, L. Timbermont, L. Bohez, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck and R. Ducatelle. 2005. Supplementation of coated butyric acid in the feed reduces colonization and shedding of salmonella in poultry. Poult. Sci. 84:1851-1856
  18. Mast, J. and B. M. Goddeeris. 1999. Development of immunecompetence of broiler chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 70:245-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00079-3
  19. Bron, F., B. Kettlitz and E. Arrigoni. 2002. Resistant starches and the butyrate revolution. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 13:251-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00131-0
  20. Kwan, Y. M. and S. C. Ricke. 2005. Induction of acid resistance of salmonella typhimurium by exposure to short chain fatty acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3458-3463
  21. Sakata, T. 1987. Stimulatory effect of short-chain fatty aids on epithelial cell proliferation in the rat intestine: a possible explanation for tropic effects of fermentable fibre, gut microbes and luminal tropic factors. Br. J. Nutr. 58:95-103 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19870073
  22. Adams, C. A. 2004. Nutricines in poultry production: focus on bioactive feed ingredients. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (B):1-12
  23. Sharma, R., U. Schumarcher, V. Ronaasen and M. coates. 1995. Rat intestinal mucosal responses to a microbial flora and different diets. Gut. 36:206-214 https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.36.2.209
  24. Duncan, D. B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42
  25. Kik, M. J. L., A. F. Husisman, B. van der Poel and J. M. V. M. Mouwen. 1990. Pathologic changes of the small intestinal mucosa of pigs after feeding phaseolis vulgaris beans. Vet. Pathol. 27:329-334 https://doi.org/10.1177/030098589002700504

피인용 문헌

  1. 1. Dose–response effects of an antimicrobial peptide, a cecropin hybrid, on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, bacterial counts in the digesta and intestinal morphology in broilers vol.108, pp.10, 2012, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  2. 2. The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract vol.13, pp.01, 2012, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  3. 3. Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid vol.16, pp.4, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  4. 4. Effect of the commercial product Lumance™, a combination of partly esterified organic acids and plant extracts, on the productive performance of broiler chickens vol.2, pp.2049-257X, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  5. 5. vol.55, pp.4, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  6. 6. Influence of Fasting during Moult on the Faecal Microbiota of Penguins vol.9, pp.6, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  7. 7. Effects of Tributyrin on Intestinal Energy Status, Antioxidative Capacity and Immune Response to Lipopolysaccharide Challenge in Broilers vol.28, pp.12, 2015, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  8. 8. Dietary factors affecting hindgut protein fermentation in broilers: a review vol.71, pp.01, 2015, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  9. 9. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Regulation of Gene Expression for Lipid Catabolism in Young Broilers by Butyrate Glycerides vol.11, pp.8, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  10. 10. Effects of captivity and artificial breeding on microbiota in feces of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) vol.6, pp.1, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  11. 11. Importance of release location on the mode of action of butyrate derivatives in the avian gastrointestinal tract vol.72, pp.01, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  12. 12. Sodium butyrate in chicken nutrition: the dynamics of performance, gut microbiota, gut morphology, and immunity vol.72, pp.02, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  13. 13. The effect of Boswellia serrata resin diet supplementation on production, hematological, biochemical and immunological parameters in broiler chickens vol.11, pp.11, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  14. 14. Microbiota of little penguins and short-tailed shearwaters during development vol.12, pp.8, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  15. 15. Effects of dry whey powder and calcium butyrate supplementation of corn/soybean-based diets on productive performance, duodenal histological integrity, and Campylobacter colonization in broilers vol.13, pp.1, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  16. 16. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review vol.18, pp.01, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  17. 17. Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens vol.96, pp.10, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80298