Effects of Feed Particle Size and Feed Form on Growth Performance, Nutrient Metabolizability and Intestinal Morphology in Broiler Chickens



Zang, J.J.;Piao, X.S.;Huang, D.S.;Wang, J.J.;Ma, X.;Ma, Yongxi

  • 투고 : 2008.06.22
  • 심사 : 2008.08.28
  • 발행 : 2009.01.01


This study was conducted to investigate the effect of feed particle size and feed form on growth performance, nutrient metabolizability and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. This experiment was a 2${\times}$2 factorial arrangement including two feed particle sizes (fine and coarse) and two feed forms (mash and pellet). A total of two hundred and eighty eight day-old male Arbor Acre broilers were used in this six week experiment. Birds were randomly allotted to four dietary treatments with six replicates per treatment and twelve birds per replicate. The results showed that pelleting diets resulted in greater ADG (p<0.01), greater ADFI (p<0.01) and lower feed to gain ratio (F/G) (p<0.05) during starter, grower and overall period. Also, pelleting improved both apparent metabolizable energy (AME) (p<0.01) and the apparent metabolizability of crude protein (p<0.05) and organic matter (p<0.05) regardless of the phase. Reduction of feed particle size enhanced AME (p<0.05) during d 19 to 21. Increased villus height (p<0.05) and crypt depth ratio (p< 0.05) within duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were observed in birds fed the pellet diet compared with those given the mash diet. In conclusion, results indicated that feed pellets might enhance performance by improving nutrient metabolizability and digestive tract development.


Feed Particle Size;Feed Form;Nutrient Metabolizability;Intestinal Morphology


  1. American Dairy Science Association. 1970. A report: Committee on classification of particle size in feedstuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 53:689-690 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(70)86274-9
  2. Lott, B. D., E. J. Day, J. W. Deaton and J. D. May. 1992. The effect of temperature, dietary energy level and corn particle size on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 71:618-624 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2000000300008
  3. Parsons, A. S., N. P. Buchanan, K. P. Blemings, M. E. Wilson and J. S. Mortiz. 2006. Effect of corn particle size and pellet texture on broiler performance in the growing phase. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:245-255
  4. Touchette, K. J., J. A. Carroll, G. L. Allee, R. L. Matteri, C. J. Dyer, L. A. Bwausang and M. E. Zannelli. 2002. Effect of spraydried plasma and lipopolysaccharide exposure on weaned pigs: I. Effects on the immune axis of weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:494-501
  5. Zelenka, J. 2003. Effect of pelleting on digestibility and metabolisable energy values of poultry diet. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 48:239-242
  6. Nir, I. and R. Hillel. 1995. Effect of particle size on performance. 3. Grinding pelleting interactions. Poult. Sci. 74:771-783 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740771
  7. Jensen, A. H. and D. E. Becker. 1965. Effect of pelleting diets and dietary components on the performance of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 24:392-397 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(85)90003-3
  8. SAS Institute. 1996. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 7.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC
  9. Amerah, A. M., V. Ravindran, R. G. Lentle and D. G. Thomas. 2007a. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poult. Sci. J. 63:439-455
  10. Peron, A., D. Bastianelli, F. X. Oury, J. Gomez and B. Carre. 2005. Effects of food depriveation and particle size of ground wheat on digestibility of food components in broilers fed on a pelleted diet. Br. Poult. Sci. 46:223-230 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500066142
  11. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis. 16th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
  12. Cera, K. R., D. C. Mahan and R. F. Cross. 1988. Effect of age, weaning and postweaning diet on small intestinal growth and jejunal morphology in young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 66:574-584
  13. Kilburn, J. and H. M. Edwards Jr. 2001. The response of broilers to the feeding of mash or pelleted diets containing maize of varying particle size. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:484-492 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120070578
  14. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  15. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 1997. ASAE S269.4, Cubes, pellets and crumbles-Definitions and methods for determining density, durability and moisture. Standards 1997. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng., St. Joseph, MI
  16. Jensen, L. S. 2000. Influence of pelleting on the nutritional needs of poultry. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:35-46
  17. Calet, C. 1965. The relative value of pellets versus mash and grain in poultry nutrition. World's Poult. Sci. J. 21:23-52 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19650006
  18. Engberg, R. M., M. S. Hedemann and B. B. Jensen. 2002. The influence of grinding and pelleting of feed on the microbial compostion and activity in the digestive tract of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:569-579 https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166022000004480
  19. Moran, E. T., Jr. 1989. Effect of pellet quality on the performance of meat birds. In: Recent advances in animal nutrition (Ed. W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole). Buttersworth, London. pp. 87-108
  20. Douslas, J. H., T. W. Sullivan, P. L. Bond, F. J. Struwe, J. G. Baier. and L. G. Robeson. 1990. Influence of grinding, rolling, and pelleting on the nutritional-value of grain sorghums and yellow corn for broilers. Poult. Sci. 69:2150-2156 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0692150
  21. Morel, P. C. and Y. H. Cottam. 2007. Effects of particle size of barley on intestinal morphology, growth performance and nutrient digestibility in pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1738-1745
  22. Reece, F. N., B. D. Lott and J. W. Deaton. 1985. The effects of feed form, grinding method, energy level and gender on broiler performance in a moderate (21°C) environment. Poult. Sci. 64:1834-1839 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90032-2
  23. Amerah, A. M., V. Ravindran, R. G. Lentle and D. G. Thomas. 2007b. Influence of feed particle size and feed form on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters. Poult. Sci. 86:2615-2623 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00212
  24. Svihus, B., K. H. Kl$\phi$vstad, V. Perez, O. Zimonja, S. Sahlstrom, R. B. Schüller, W. K. Jeksrud and E. Prestl$\phi$ kken. 2004. Physical and nutritional effects of pelleting of broiler chicken diets made from wheat ground to different coarseness by the use of roller mill and hammer mill. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 117:281-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.08.009
  25. Goodband, R. D., M. D. Tokach and J. L. Nellssen. 2002. The effects of diet particle size on animal performance, MF-2050 Feed Manufacturing. Dept. Grain Sci. Ind., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan

피인용 문헌

  1. 1. Feeding behaviour of broiler chickens: a review on the biomechanical characteristics vol.16, pp.2, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  2. 2. Protein source and dietary structure influence growth performance, gut morphology, and hindgut fermentation characteristics in broilers vol.93, pp.12, 2014, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  3. 3. Effects of sorghum on broilers gastrointestinal tract vol.17, pp.1, 2015, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  4. 4. Effect of feeding semi-moist diets and highly digestible carbohydrate and protein sources in the prestarter phase on performance of broiler chicks vol.56, pp.11, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  5. 5. Particle size and feed form in broiler diets: impact on gastrointestinal tract development and gut health vol.72, pp.02, 2016, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  6. 6. Effect of black cumin seeds on growth performance, nutrient utilization, immunity, gut health and nitrogen excretion in broiler chickens vol.97, pp.11, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  7. 7. Effect of particle size distribution of maize and soybean meal on the precaecal amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens pp.1466-1799, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352
  8. 8. Effects of conditioning time and sodium bentonite on pellet quality, growth performance, intestinal morphology and nutrient retention in finisher broilers pp.1466-1799, 2017, doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.80352