Optimal Perilune Altitude of Lunar Landing Trajectory

Cho, Dong-Hyun;Jeong, Bo-Young;Lee, Dong-Hun;Bang, Hyo-Choong

  • Published : 2009.05.30


In general, the lunar landing stage can be divided into two distinct phases: de-orbit and descent, and the descent phase usually comprises two sub-phases: braking and approach. And many optimization problems of minimal energy are usually focused on descent phases. In these approaches, the energy of de-orbit burning is not considered. Therefore, a possible low perilune altitude can be chosen to save fuel for the descent phase. Perilune altitude is typically specified between 10 and 15km because of the mountainous lunar terrain and possible guidance errors. However, it requires more de-orbit burning energy for the lower perilune altitude. Therefore, in this paper, the perilune altitude of the intermediate orbit is also considered with optimal thrust programming for minimal energy. Furthermore, the perilune altitude and optimal thrust programming can be expressed by a function of the radius of a parking orbit by using continuation method and co-state estimator.


Lunar landing;Optimal trajectory;Perilune altitude


  1. Bennett, F. V., 1972, “Mission planning for Lunar module descent and ascent”, NASA Technical Note, Houston
  2. Ramanan, R. V. and Lal, M., 2005, “Analysis of optimal strategies for soft landing on the Moon from lunar parking orbits”, Journal of Earth Systems Science, Vol. 114, No. 6, pp. 807-813
  3. Shan, Y and Duan, G., 2007, “Study on the Optimal Fuel Consumption of the Singularity Condition for Lunar Soft Landing”, Proc. of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 2254-2258.
  4. Hwakins, A.M., 2005, "Constrained Trajectory Optimization of a Soft Lunar Landing from a Parking Orbit”, the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics
  5. Liu, X., Duan, G., 2006, “Nonlinear Optimal Control for the Soft Landing of Lunar Lander”, Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics, pp. 1381-1387.
  6. Liu, X., Duan, G., and Teo, K., 2008, "Brief paper: Optimal soft landing control for moon lander”, Automatica, Vol.4, pp. 1097-1103.
  7. McInnes, C.R., 1995, "Path Shaping Guidance for Terminal Lunar Descent”, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 367-377.
  8. Lee, Donghun and Bang, Hyochoong, 2008, “Optimal Earth Escape Trajectory Using Continuation method and costate estimator”, 18th AAS/AISS Space Flight Mechanics Meeting
  9. Hull, D. G., 2003, Optimal Control Theory for Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 258-274.

Cited by

  1. Development of Precise Lunar Orbit Propagator and Lunar Polar Orbiter's Lifetime Analysis vol.27, pp.2, 2010,
  2. Analysis on Tracking Schedule and Measurements Characteristics for the Spacecraft on the Phase of Lunar Transfer and Capture vol.31, pp.1, 2014,
  3. Optimal Lunar Landing Trajectory Design for Hybrid Engine vol.2015, 2015,
  4. Optimal Trajectory Design of Descent/Ascent phase for a Lunar Lander With Considerable Sub-Phases vol.38, pp.12, 2010,
  5. Control of powered descent phase for a Lunar lander using PID controller vol.39, pp.5, 2011,
  6. Analysis of Delta-V Losses During Lunar Capture Sequence Using Finite Thrust vol.28, pp.3, 2011,
  7. Lunar CubeSat Impact Trajectory Characteristics as a Function of Its Release Conditions vol.2015, 2015,
  8. Optimal phase-angle design for the powered-descent phase of lunar lander vol.230, pp.11, 2016,
  9. An optimal trajectory design for the lunar vertical landing vol.230, pp.11, 2016,
  10. Waypoint Constrained Multi-phase Optimal Guidance of Spacecraft for Soft Lunar Landing pp.2301-3869, 2019,