Comparison of Muscle Activity and Input Performance of Operators Using a Computer Mouse and a Trackball

  • Yoo, Hwan-Suk (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Woosong University) ;
  • Yi, Chung-Hwi (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Yun (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeon, Hye-Seon (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yoo, Won-Gyu (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering. Inje University)
  • Received : 2009.10.04
  • Accepted : 2009.11.02
  • Published : 2009.11.19

Abstract

This study compared the electromyographic activities and input performance of computer operators using a computer mouse and a trackball. Muscle activities were assessed at the upper trapezius (UT), middle deltoid (MD), extensor digitorum (ED), and first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). Twenty-six healthy subjects were recruited, and the test order was selected randomly for each subject. The task set was to click moving targets on a Windows program. The EMG amplitude was normalized using the percentage of reference voluntary contraction for UT and MD and the percentage of maximal voluntary contraction for ED and FDI. To analyze the differences in EMG activity, a paired t-test was used. UT muscle activities were significantly greater when the computer mouse was used (p<.05). FDI muscle activities were significantly greater when the trackball was used (p<.05). Using a trackball can reduce the load on the UT during computer work and help to prevent and manage work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

References

  1. Aaras A, Dainoff M, Ro O, et al. Can a more neutral position of the forearm when operating a computer mouse reduce the pain level for VDU operators- Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;30(4-5):307-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00133-6
  2. Chen HC, Wu HC, Liu YP. Design and functional evaluation of a novel external logger for computer input activities. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(5):790-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.007
  3. Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R, Chang SW. The prevalence of neck and upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in computer mouse users. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;26(3):347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00010-X
  4. Cooper A, Straker L. Mouse versus keyboard use: A comparison of shoulder muscle load. Int J Ind Ergon. 1998;22(4-5):351-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00088-7
  5. Cram JR, Kasman GS. Holtz J. Introduction to Surface Electromyography. Gaithersburg, Maryland, Aspen Pub, 1998;237-328.
  6. Fernstrom EAC, Aborg CM. Alterations in shoulder muscle activity due to changes in data entry organisation. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;23(3):231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00058-9
  7. Gustafsson E, Hagberg M. Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: Exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. Appl Ergon. 2003;34(2):107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00005-X
  8. Hamrick C. Ergonomics. Public employers ergonomics: Best practices. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004;1(4):D42-D46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620490432051
  9. Haynes S. Effects of positioning optimization in an alternative computer workstation for people with and without low back pain. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(5):719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.05.001
  10. Jensen C, Finsen L. Hansen K, et al. Upper trapezius muscle activity patterns during repetitive manual material handling and work with a computer mouse. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(5):317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(99)00007-3
  11. Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C. Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: The "Bit" follow up study on office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(3):188-194. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.013920
  12. Karlqvist L, Bernmark E, Ekenvall L, et al. Computer mouse and track-ball operation: Similarities and differences in posture, muscular load and perceived exertion. Int J Ind Ergon, 1999;23(3):157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00031-0
  13. Kee DH. Investigation on status of musculoskeletal disorders for industrial safety managers. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2003;22(4):79-90. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2003.22.4.079
  14. Kim JR. Ergonomics for Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Minyoungsa, Seoul. South Korea. 2004:12-21.
  15. Magni G, Caldieron C, Rigatti-Luchini S, et al. Chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms in the general population. An analysis of the 1st National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Pain. 1990;43(3):299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90027-B
  16. Nag PK, Pal S, Nag A, et al. Influence of arm and wrist support on forearm and back muscle activity in computer keyboard operation. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(2):286-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.016
  17. Park KS, Hong GB, Kim SS, et al, Proposal of a Movable armrest for preventing the musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2000;25(2):1-9.
  18. Simoneau GG, Marklin RW, BerMan JE. Effect of computer keyboard slope on wrist position and forearm electromyography of typists without musculoskeletal disorders. Phys Ther. 2003;83(9):816-830.
  19. Smith MW, Sharit J, Czaja SJ. Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Hum Factors. 1999;41(3):389-396. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779611102
  20. Smutz WP, France EP, Bloswick DS. Measurement of creep strain of flexor tendons during low-force high-frequency activities such as computer keyboard use. Clin Biomech. 1995;10(2):67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(95)92041-J