A Comparative Analysis of the Problem-Based Learning and Project-Based Learning Strategies on the Course of Engineering Design

공학설계 교과목에서 문제 중심 교수-학습과 프로젝트 중심 교수-학습 전략 비교 분석

  • Shin, Haeng-Ja (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Dong-A Univ.) ;
  • Son, Joon-Ik (Dept. of Electronic Engineering, Dong-A Univ.) ;
  • Im, Young-Do (Dept. of Electronic Engineering, Dong-A Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wook (Dept. of Electronic Engineering, Dong-A Univ.)
  • 신행자 (동아대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 손준익 (동아대학교 전자공학과) ;
  • 임영도 (동아대학교 전자공학과) ;
  • 김종욱 (동아대학교 전자공학과)
  • Received : 2009.08.12
  • Accepted : 2009.10.27
  • Published : 2009.12.31


This paper deals with the analysis and comparison between on the course of a conventional engineering design (typically project-based learning) and a new engineering design (introduced PBL model to conventional engineering design). The purpose of the study is to identify and prove the effect of PBL model on the course with a new teaching-learning. In the result of t-test, there were significant statistics in the creative problem solving and self-directed learning ability, but no significant statistics in the team work and communication skill ability. Also the average of factors of the problem-based strategy is higher than those of the project-based strategy. In the problem-based strategy, the team work has the most influential on the satisfactory of the course. However in the project-based strategy, the comprehension of given product has the most influential on the satisfactory. Finally, this study has proved the effect of PBL on the course engineering design.


Course of the Engineering Design;Project-based Learning;Problem-based Learning;Teaching-learning Strategy


Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단


  1. 강인애.정준환.정득년(2007). PBL의 실천적 이해, 문음사
  2. 박강 외(2005). 창의공학, 인터비젼
  3. ABET(2007), Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc
  4. 동아대학교(2007). 팀워크기술-팀제 교육과정 중심의 학습성과 평가, 한국공학교육연구센터구축사업 최종보고서. 한국공학교육연구센터, 667-697
  5. 조연순(2006). 문제중심학습의 이론과 실제, 학지사
  6. Rogers, G. M.(2003). Outcome-based Program Assessment, Rose-Hulman Institute Technology
  7. 한국공학교육인증원(2006). 공학인증기준2005 (KEC 2005), ABEEK-2006-AB-020
  8. Lyle D. Feisel. et al.(2002), A Colloquy on Learning Objectives For Engineering Education Laboratories, Proceeding of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
  9. 강소연 외(2005). 공학교육에서의 PBL 수업의 효과. 공학교육연구, 8(2) : 24-34