DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Boundary between Human and Humanism Constructed by Formalism Film <Dogville>

형식주의 영화 <Dogville>이 구성하는 인간과 인간다움의 경계

  • 강승묵 (공주대학교 영상광정보공학부)
  • Received : 2009.08.07
  • Accepted : 2009.09.25
  • Published : 2009.12.28

Abstract

Humanism connotes dignity and esteem with the essential idea of human and more human. This paper has conducted a inquiry of the understanding about human and humanism represented by visual image of film. Especially, this study investigated the way to adhere to reflective attitude about human and society. It is based on theoretical discussion of formalism and auteurism and analyzed the way of constructing time-space structure of (by Lars von Trier) which is known the typical formalism film. According to the findings, appeared to appropriate the ocularcentrism aesthetic to film form and give the self-regulation to definite the idea of film art through picturesque imagination of dramatic stage. Such a result means that it converts the filmic time-space to the virtual things and practicalize the classification of the ethical doctrine of innate goodness and innate sin of human and the definition of humanism. Also it means formalism film overturns the existing institutional mode of representation.

Keywords

Human;Humanism;Formalism;Auteurism;Time-space Structure;Institutional Mode of Representation

References

  1. http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/02/vontrier.html#film
  2. W. Buckland, Film Studies, 장석용, 정재우, 영화연구, 현대미학사, pp.39-42, 2002.
  3. 영화진흥위원회교재편찬위원회, 영화 [읽기], 커뮤니케이션북스, p.24, 2004.
  4. N. Burch and J. Dana, "Propositions," Afferimage 5, (Spring 1974), No.i, pp.40-66, 1974.
  5. D. N. Rodowick, The Crisis of Political Modernism: Criticism and Ideology in Contemporary Film Theory, 김수진, 현대 영화이론의 궤적: 정치적 모더니즘의 위기, 한나래, pp.171-187, 1999.
  6. R. Lapsley and M. Westlake, Film Theory: An Introduction, 이영재, 김소연, 현대 영화이론의 이해, 시각과 언어, pp.179-212, 1995.
  7. P. Wollen, Signs and Meaning in the Cinema, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp.102-115, 1972.
  8. V. F. Perkins, Film as Film, New York: Da Capo Press, p.158, 1972. (Reprinted in 1993)
  9. 이용관, "미국의 작가주의 I : 앤드류 사리스의 기본 입장을 중심으로", 영화연구, 제6호, pp.5-38, 1989.
  10. A. Sarris, "Notes as the Auteur Theory in 1962", trans. G. Mast & M. Cohen, Film Theory and Criticism, pp.650-665, New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. M. Bal, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 한용환, 강덕화, 서사란 무엇인가, p.40, 문예출판사, 1999.
  12. K. Thompson, Storytelling in the New Hollywood: Understanding Classical Narrative Technique, pp.7-31, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2000.
  13. J. Aumont and M. Marie, L'Analtse des Films, 전수일, 영화분석의 패러다임, 현대미학사, p.237, 1999.
  14. J. Aumont and M. Marie, L'Analtse des Films, 전수일, 영화분석의 패러다임, 현대미학사, p.208, 1999.
  15. D. Bordwell and K. Thompson, Film Art: An Introduction, 주진숙, 이용관, 영화예술, 이론과 실천, 1993.
  16. 류지미, "영화 도그빌 속의 연극성에 대한 고찰", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제8권, 제11호, p.108, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2008.8.11.103