Fatigue Fracture Assessment of Honeycomb Composite Side-Wall Panel Joint for the KTX Tilting Car Body

틸팅차량용 KTX 차체의 하니컴복합재 측벽판 체결부의 피로파괴평가

  • Jeong, Dal-Woo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Seok (Railroad Structure Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Nak-Sam (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 정달우 (한양대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 김정석 (한국철도기술연구원 철도구조연구실) ;
  • 최낙삼 (한양대학교 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2010.01.01


The honeycomb composite joint structure designed for application to a tilting KTX railroad car body is subjected to bending loads of a cantilever type. Honeycomb sandwich composite panel-joint attached in the real tilting car body was fabricated and sectioned as several beam-joint specimens for the bending test. The fracture behaviors of these specimens under static loads were different from those under cyclic loads. Static bending loads caused shear deformation and fracture in the honeycomb core region, while fatigue cyclic bend loading caused delamination along the interface between the composite skin and the honeycomb core, and/or caused a fracture in the welded part jointed with the steel under-frame. These fracture behaviors could occur in other industrial honeycomb composite joints with similar sub-structures, and be used for improving design parameters of a honeycomb composite joint structure.


Honeycomb Composite Side-Wall Panel Joint;Tilting KTX Car Body;Fatigue Bending Test;Fatigue Strength


  1. Li, B. and Fatemi, A., 2006, “An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fatigue Behavior of Coach Peel Riveted Joints,” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 9-18
  2. Shin, K. B. and Lee, S. J., 2004, “The Case and Technique on Lightweight of Railway Vehicle System using Composite Materials,” Korea Society for Composite Materials, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 82-86
  3. Shin, K. B. and Lee, S. J., 2005, “A Study on Manufacturing Technology of Hybrid Composite Carbody Structures Using Autoclave Molding Process,” Korean Society for Composite Materials, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 52-58
  4. Lim, T. S., Kim, B. C. and Lee. D. G., 2006, “Fatigue Characteristics of the Bolted Joints for Unidirectional Composite Laminates,” Composite Structures, Vol. 72, pp. 58-68
  5. Kelly, G., 2006,“Quasi-Static Strength and Fatigue Life of Hybrid(Bonded/Bolted)Composite Single-Lap Joints,” Composite Structures, Vol. 72. pp. 119-129
  6. Xiao, Y. and Ishikawa, T., 2005, “Bearing Strength and Failure Behavior of Bolted Composite Joints. Part I: Experimental Investigation,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 65, pp. 1022-1031
  7. Counts, W. A. and Johnson, W. S., 2002, “Bolt Bearing Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperature.” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 24, pp. 197-204
  8. Herrington, P. D. and Sabbaghian, M., 1993, “Fatigue Failure of Composite Bolted Joints,” Journal of composite Material, Vol. 27, pp. 491-512
  9. Thoppul, S. D., Finegan, J. and Gibson, R. F., 2009, “Mechanics of Mechanically Fastened Joints in Polymer–Matrix Composite Structures – A Review,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 69, No. 3-4, pp. 301-329
  10. Caccese, V., Kabche, J. P. and Berube, K. A., 2007, “Analysis of a Hybrid Composite/Metal Bolted Connection Subjected to Flexural Loading,” Composite Structures, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 450-462
  11. Mottram, J. T. and Zheng, Y., 1996, “State-of-theart Review on the Design of Beam-to-Column Connections for Pultruded Frames,” Composite Structures, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 387-401
  12. Lemonis, M. E. and Gantes, C. J., 2009, “Mechanical Modeling of the Nonlinear Response of Beam-to-Column Joints,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 879-890
  13. Wang, W. D., Han, L. H. and Zhao, X. L., 2009, “Analytical Behavior of Frames with Steel Beams to Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 497-508
  14. Granata, P. J. and Parvin, A., 2001, “An Experimental Study on Kevlar Strengthening of Beam–Column Connections,” Composite Structures, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 163-171
  15. Kim, B. J. and Lee, D. G., 2008, “Characteristics of Joining Inserts for Composite Sandwich Panels,” Composite Structures, Vol. 86, No. 1-3, pp. 55-60
  16. Jung,D.W., Choi,N.S., Kim,J.S., Seo,S.I., Jo,S.H., 2007, “Static and Fatigue Fracture Assessment of hybrid Composite Joint for the Tilting Car Body,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers Part A, Vol.31, No.2, pp.166-173
  17. The European Standard EN12663, 2000, Railway Applications-Structural Requirements of Railway Vehicle Bodies, European Committee for Standardization
  18. The UIC Code 566OR, 3rd edition of 1.1.90, 2003, Loadings of Coach Bodies and Their Components, International Union of Railways