DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Augmented Reality Contents Based Instruction on Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow of Learning

증강현실 콘텐츠 기반 수업이 학업성취, 학습흥미, 몰입에 미치는 효과

  • Published : 2010.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study is to find out the effect of augmented reality contents based instruction on academic achievement, interest and flow of learning. The subjects were 142 students of five classes, sampled from 6th graders of an elementary school. Three classes(86 students) were taught by augmented reality based instruction and the other two classes(56 students) were taught by textbook based instruction for 2 weeks. The experimental design of the study was the pretest-posttest control group design. The results are summarized as follows: First, there is a significant difference in academic achievement between two groups. Augmented reality based instruction group accomplished higher achievement than textbook based instruction group. Second, there is no significant difference in general interest of learning between two groups. But in the interest of lessons taken by students themselves, augmented reality based instruction is more effective than textbook based instruction. Finally, there is a significant difference in learning flow between two groups. Augmented reality based instruction group showed higher learning flow than textbook based instruction group.

Keywords

Augmented Reality;Augmented Reality Based Instruction;e-Learning

References

  1. 백영균, 박주성, 한승록, 김정겸, 최명숙, 변호승, 박정환, 강신천, 유비쿼터스 시대의 교육방법 및 교육공학, 서울: 학지사, 2006.
  2. 한국전자통신연구원, 실감형 e-러닝 기반 개인맞춤형 학습시스템 개발에 관한 연구, 연구보고 06MC1900-01-0702P, 2007.
  3. R. T. Azuma, “A survey of augmented reality, In presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment,” Vol.6, No.4, pp.355-385, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  4. P. Milgram and F. A. Kishino, “Taxonomy of mixed reality visual display," IECE Trans. on Information and Systems (Special Issue on Networked Reality), E77-D(12), pp.1321-1329, 1994.
  5. 안혜리, 천두만, 안성훈, “증강현실(Augmented Reality) 기술을 활용한 미술교육”, 미술교육논총, 제19권, 제3호, pp.455-474, 2005.
  6. M. Hamilton and K. Nowak, “Information systems concepts across two decades: an empirical analysis of trends in theory, methods, process, and research domains,” Journal of Communication, Vol.9, pp.529-553, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02684.x
  7. Gatner, Gatner's annual Hype Cycle Special Report, 2008. http://imagesrv.gartner.com/pdf/2008_annual_report.pdf.(2009년 10월 1일 검색)
  8. http://www.google.com/trends?q=Augmented+Reality%2C+Virtual+Reality(2009년 11월 4일 검색)
  9. 류지헌, 조일현, 허희옥, 김정현, 계보경, 고범석, 증강현실 기반 차세대 체험형 학습모형 연구, 서울: 한국교육학술정보원, 2006.
  10. 계보경, 증강현실(Augmented Reality) 기반 학 습에서 매체특성, 현존감(Presence), 학습몰입 (Flow), 학습효과의 관계 규명, 미간행 박사학위 논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 2007.
  11. 김희수, 김여상, 신영숙, 서명석, “지구과학교과 교육을 위한 웹기반 3차원 가상현실 기법의 활용”, 교육공학연구, 제17권, 제3호, pp.85-116, 2001.
  12. B. E. Shelton, How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Washington, Washington, 2003.
  13. M. Billinghurst, H. Kato, and I. Poupyrev, “The Magic Book-Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol.21, No.3, pp.6-8, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.920621
  14. R. Fauland, “Using immersive scientific visualizations for science inquiry: Co-construction of knowledge by middle and high school students,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Associations, New Orleans, LA, 2002.
  15. B. E. Shelton and N. Hedley, “Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students,” Proceeding of First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/ART.2002.1106948
  16. H. Kaufmann and D. Schmalstieg, “Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality,” Comptuers and Graphics, Vol.27, pp.339-345, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1
  17. 김정현, 계보경, 서진석, 김남규, 정선미, 이예하, 고범석, 증강현실(Augmented Reality)기반의 체험형 학습 콘텐츠 개발 및 현장적용 연구, 서울: 한국교육학술정보원, 2005.
  18. 서희전, “증강현실기반 학습환경에서 학습자의 현존감, 학습몰입감, 사용성에 대한 태도, 학업성취도의 관계 연구”, 교육정보미디어연구, 제14권, 제3호, pp.137-166, 2008.
  19. 여선민, 증강현실 기반 콘텐츠 활용 수업의 효과성 분석, 미간행 석사학위논문, 원광대학교 교육대학원, 2009.
  20. 김용훈, 이수웅, 이준석, 노경희, “혼합현실기반 이러닝 기술동향”, 전자통신동향분석, 제24권, 제1호, pp.90-100, 2009.
  21. 노경희, 김충회, 구성중심 수업이 학습자의 학업성취, 학습흥미 및 학습전이에 미치는 효과, 교육심리연구, 제15권, 제1호, pp.161-181, 2000.
  22. U. Schiefele, “Interest, learning, and motivation,” Educational psychologist, Vol.26, No.3, pp.299-323, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
  23. S. A Jackson and H. W. Marsh, “Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale,” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol.18, pp.17-35, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
  24. M. Csikeszentmihalyi, Flow : The psychology of optimal experience, New York: Harper and Row, 1990.
  25. 안정은, 증강현실 기반 과학교육 학습콘텐츠 구현, 미간행 석사학위논문, 부경대학교 교육대학원, 2008.
  26. 장상헌, 계보경, “증강현실(Augmented Reality) 콘텐츠의 교육적 적용”, 한국콘텐츠학회지, 제5권, 제2호, pp.79-85, 2007.
  27. M. Billinghurst, Shared space: explorations in collaborative augmented reality, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Washington, 2002.

Cited by

  1. Development of a Platform for Augmented Reality-Based Speech Language Therapy vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18504