DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Response Surface Method as an Experimental Design to Optimize Coagulation Tests

Trinh, Thuy Khanh;Kang, Lim-Seok

  • Received : 2009.07.01
  • Accepted : 2010.02.22
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

In this study, the response surface method and experimental design were applied as an alternative to conventional methods for the optimization of coagulation tests. A central composite design, with 4 axial points, 4 factorial points and 5 replicates at the center point were used to build a model for predicting and optimizing the coagulation process. Mathematical model equations were derived by computer simulation programming with a least squares method using the Minitab 15 software. In these equations, the removal efficiencies of turbidity and total organic carbon (TOC) were expressed as second-order functions of two factors, such as alum dose and coagulation pH. Statistical checks (ANOVA table, $R^2$ and $R^2_{adj}$ value, model lack of fit test, and p value) indicated that the model was adequate for representing the experimental data. The p values showed that the quadratic effects of alum dose and coagulation pH were highly significant. In other words, these two factors had an important impact on the turbidity and TOC of treated water. To gain a better understanding of the two variables for optimal coagulation performance, the model was presented as both 3-D response surface and 2-D contour graphs. As a compromise for the simultaneously removal of maximum amounts of 92.5% turbidity and 39.5% TOC, the optimum conditions were found with 44 mg/L alum at pH 7.6. The predicted response from the model showed close agreement with the experimental data ($R^2$ values of 90.63% and 91.43% for turbidity removal and TOC removal, respectively), which demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in achieving good predictions, while minimizing the number of experiments required.

Keywords

Coagulation tests;Drinking water treatment;Experimental design;Optimizing coagulation;Response surface methodology

References

  1. Clearsby JL, Dharmarajah AH, Sindt GL, Baumann ER. Design and operation guidelines for optimization of the high-rate filtration process: plant survey results. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation; 1989.
  2. Pernitsky DJ. Coagulation 101. Alberta Water and Wastewater Operators Association (AWWOA) Annual Seminar; 2004; Alberta, Canada.
  3. Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess JL. Statistical design and analysis of experiments with applications to engineering and science. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
  4. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Responses surfaces: design and analyses. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
  5. Khuri AI. An overview of the use of generalized linear models in response surface methodology. Nonlinear Anal. 2001;47:2023-2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00330-3
  6. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation; 1998.
  7. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. p. 427-510.
  8. Box GEP, Hunter JS. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Statist. 1957;28:195-241. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177707047
  9. NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical method [Inter net]. Available from: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook.
  10. Haber A, Runyun RP. General statistics. 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley; 1977.
  11. Faust SD, Aly OM. Removal of particulate matter by coagulation. In: Faust SD, Aly OM, eds. Chemistry of water treatment, 2nd ed. Florida: CRC Press; 1998. p. 217-270.
  12. Kim SH. Enhanced coagulation: determination of controlling criteria and an effect on turbidity removal. Environ. Eng. Res. 2005;10:105-111. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2005.10.3.105

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Siloxane Adsorption Characteristics Using Response Surface Methodology vol.17, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2012.17.2.117
  2. Optimisation of beef tenderisation treated with bromelain using response surface methodology (RSM) vol.04, pp.05, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.45B013
  3. Optimization of Ultrasonic Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants from Green Tea Using Response Surface Methodology vol.18, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules181113530
  4. UV-Initiated Polymerization of Cationic Polyacrylamide: Synthesis, Characterization, and Sludge Dewatering Performance vol.2013, pp.1537-744X, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/937937
  5. Response surface methodology approach to optimize coagulation-flocculation process using composite coagulants vol.30, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0169-y
  6. Effects of carrageenan and jackfruit puree on the texture of goat's milk Dadih using response surface methodology vol.66, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12053
  7. Statistical Design for Formulation Optimization of Hydrocortisone Butyrate-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles vol.15, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-014-0072-4
  8. Arsenic Removal from Natural Groundwater by Electrocoagulation Using Response Surface Methodology vol.2014, pp.2090-9071, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/857625
  9. Arsenic Removal from Water by Sugarcane Bagasse: An Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) vol.225, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2028-4
  10. Employing Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Lutein and β-Carotene from Spinach vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046611
  11. Preparation, characterization and kinetic behavior of supported copper oxide catalysts on almond shell-based activated carbon for oxidation of toluene in air vol.22, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-014-9877-5
  12. Simultaneous extraction, optimization, and analysis of flavonoids and polyphenols from peach and pumpkin extracts using a TLC-densitometric method vol.9, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-015-0113-4
  13. Optimization of high hardness perforated steel armor plates using finite element and response surface methods vol.24, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2016.1196771
  14. and Alginate Using the Box–Behnken Response Surface Methodology vol.56, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04765
  15. Species-specific interaction of trihalomethane (THM) precursors in a scaled-up distribution network using response surface methodology (RSM) vol.39, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1301564
  16. Extraction Optimization of Polyphenols from Waste Kiwi Fruit Seeds (Actinidia chinensis Planch.) and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties vol.21, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070832
  17. Experimental investigation of design parameters for laboratory scale Pelton wheel turbine using RSM vol.204, pp.2261-236X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820407019
  18. Preparation and Characterization of Polyacrylonitrile/Aluminum Oxide Nanofiber Adsorbent Modified with 2-Amino-3-Methyl-1-Hexanethiol for the Adsorption of Thorium (IV) Ion from Aqueous Solution vol.144, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001446
  19. ) kernel coagulant pp.1563-5201, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1483351
  20. Optimization of Photooxidative Removal of Phenazopyridine from Water vol.92, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418050266

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Pukyong National University