Comparative study of wound healing in porcine urinary bladder with CO2 laser and scalpel incisions

CO2 Laser와 Scalpel을 이용한 절개 시 돼지 방광에서의 창상치유 평가

  • Lee, Jae-Yeon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Mok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Whan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Chang-Sik (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Cheol (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • 이재연 (충남대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 정성목 (충남대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 조성환 (충남대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 박창식 (충남대학교 동물자원학부, 형질전환 복제돼지 연구센터) ;
  • 김명철 (충남대학교 수의과대학)
  • Accepted : 2010.08.03
  • Published : 2010.09.30


This study compared the instrument performance and tissue healing of a steel scalpel with a $CO_2$ laser in an animal urinary bladder surgery model. Landrace and Yorkshire mixed breed pigs were used. Two symmetrical incisions were made in urinary bladder of each pig. One incision was made on the left side of ventral aspect on urinary bladder using a steel scalpel, while the other incision was performed on the right side using a $CO_2$ laser with an 8W output power. Each instrument was evaluated clinically for speed, ease of incision, and extent of bleeding. At 7 and 21 days after initial wounding, each wound was taken for histological observations. The scalpel was an easier instrument to use in the confines of the urinary bladder tissue, compared with the laser. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The amount of bleeding was less in the laser group but the time of the incisions was shorter with the scalpel. Scalpel incisions showed complete restoration of the epithelium and muscularis. On the other hand, the laser incisions showed incomplete restoration of the epithelium and muscularis. However, most of wound healing in the laser incisions was accomplished according to the time lapse. Although the scalpel produced less damage to the urinary bladder tissue and was easier to handle than the $CO_2$ laser, it did not provide hemostasis that was helpful for use on highly vascular tissue. The $CO_2$ laser provided good hemostasis, but delayed wound healing. In conclusion, the $CO_2$ laser provided better hemostasis and better surgical field than the scalpel. The $CO_2$ laser was used effectively in urinary bladder incision.


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. Bailin PL. The $CO_{2}$ laser in Dermatology. Cleve Clin J Med 1989, 56, 118.
  2. Berger N, Eeg PH. Veterinary Laser Surgery. pp. 185- 223, Blackwell, Iowa, 2006.
  3. Buell BR, Schuller DE. Comparison of tensile strength in $CO_{2}$ laser and salpel skin incisions. Arch Otolaryngol 1983, 109, 465-467.
  4. Fisher SE, Frame JW, Browne RM, Tranter RM. A comparative histological study of wound healing following $CO_{2}$ laser and conventional surgical excision of canine buccal mucosa. Arch Oral Biol 1983, 28, 287-291.
  5. Hall RR. The healing of tissues incised by a carbondioxide laser. Br J Surg 1971, 58, 222-225.
  6. Jako GJ. Laser surgery of the vocal cords. An experimental study with carbon dioxide lasers on dogs. Laryngoscope 1972, 82, 2204-2216.
  7. Lee JY, Park CS, Cho SW, Jeong SM, Kim MC. Comparative study of wound healing in porcine uterus with $CO_{2}$ laser and scalpel incisions. J Vet Clin 2009, 26, 563-567.
  8. Molgat YM, Pollack SV, Hurwitz JJ, Bunas SJ, Manning T, McCormack KM, Pinnell SR. Comparative study of wound healing in porcine skin with $CO_{2}$ laser and other surgical modalities: preliminary findings. Int J Dermatol 1995, 34, 42-47.
  9. Tuffin JR, Carruth JA. The carbon dioxide surgical laser. Br Dent J 1980, 149, 255-258.
  10. Wang X, Ishizaki NT, Matsumoto K. Healing process of skin after $CO_{2}$ laser ablation at low irradiance: a comparison of continuous-wave and pulsed mode. Photomed Laser Surg 2005, 23, 20-26.