Benchmarking on Product Development Curricula of Domestic and Foreign Universities

국내외 대학의 제품개발 교과과정 벤치마킹

  • Received : 2010.07.15
  • Accepted : 2010.06.01
  • Published : 2010.06.30


Human resources specialized in product development (PD) being essential in industry to enhance their competitiveness in the market with differentiated products, the PD curricula of domestic universities are in need of restructuring to better provide a comprehensive and diverse spectrum of knowledge as well as practical experiences for PD. We compared the PD curricula of selected domestic and foreign universities and identified advanced features of PD curricula. The major portion of the information used in our benchmarking of the seven, three domestic and four foreign, universities is obtained through their official websites. At domestic universities, the PD curricula comes in different sizes and is administered at the departmental level. On the other hand, each foreign university has her own unique form of PD curricula which is formulated on the firm basis of multidisciplinary collaboration among schools of Engineering, Management, and Arts with diversified program options ranging from giving course credits to offering various certificates and degrees. The industrial sponsorship in the form of financial support and mentorship at foreign universities is much more noticeable than at domestic universities. The survey results of the present study can be effectively utilized to develop an effective PD curriculum.


Product development curriculum;Curriculum development;Multidisciplinary collaboration model;Industry-academic collaboration model;Program option diversification


  1. 서울대학교(2006). 서울대학교 홈페이지. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  2. 오상헌(2004). LG 혁신학교 들어가보니. 한국경제신문. Retrieved July 27, 2005 from
  3. 이원섭.정기효.장준호.장준호.유희천.장수영.정무영.한성호.전치혁(2008). 혁신제품개발 교육과정에 대한 학생과 산업체 실무자의 요구사항 분석. 공학교육연구, 11(4): 11-18.
  4. 장동준(2004). 삼성전기 거북선센터 혁신제품개발 '순항'. 전자신문. Retrieved July 27, 2005 from
  5. 포항공과대학교(2006). 포항공과대학교 홈페이지. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  6. 홍익대학교(2006). 홍익대학교 홈페이지. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  7. CMU(2006). Carnegie Melon University homepage. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  8. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. and Leifer L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1): 103-120.
  9. KAIST(2006). KAIST 홈페이지. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  10. MIT(2006). Massachusetts Institute of Technology homepage. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  11. Rozenfeld, H., Mundim, A. P. F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L. , Guerrero, V. and da Horta L. C. (2003). Teaching product development in a corporate education program - a new approach, International journal of Continuous Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13: 148-170.
  12. Stanford(2006). Stanford university homepage. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from
  13. Todd, R. H., Sorensen, C. D. and Magleby, S. P. (1993). Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2): 92-100.
  14. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D. (2003). Product Design and Development (3rd ed). Boston, McGraw-Hill
  15. 정기효.장준호.이원섭.한윤택.유희천.장수영.전치혁(2008). 혁신제품개발 교육과정 개발을 위한 전략 수립 방법. 공학교육연구, 11(3): pp.5-11.


Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단