DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Convergence Characteristics of Upwind Method for Modified Artificial Compressibility Method

Lee, Hyung-Ro;Lee, Seung-Soo

  • 투고 : 2011.07.15
  • 심사 : 2011.12.07
  • 발행 : 2011.12.30

초록

This paper investigates the convergence characteristics of the modified artificial compressibility method proposed by Turkel. In particular, a focus is mode on the convergence characteristics due to variation of the preconditioning factor (${\alpha}_u$) and the artificial compressibility (${\beta}$) in conjunction with an upwind method. For the investigations, a code using the modified artificial compressibility is developed. The code solves the axisymmetric incompressible Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The cell-centered finite volume method is used in conjunction with Roe's approximate Riemann solver for the inviscid flux, and the central difference discretization is used for the viscous flux. Time marching is accomplished by the approximated factorization-alternate direction implicit method. In addition, Menter's k-${\omega}$ shear stress transport turbulence model is adopted for analysis of turbulent flows. Inviscid, laminar, and turbulent flows are solved to investigate the accuracy of solutions and convergence behavior in the modified artificial compressibility method. The possible reason for loss of robustness of the modified artificial compressibility method with ${\alpha}_u$ >1.0 is given.

키워드

Computational fluid dynamics;Incompressible Navier-Stokes equations;Upwind method;Artificial compressibility method

참고문헌

  1. Beam, R. M. and Warming, R. F. (1982). Implicit Numerical Methods for the Compressible Navier-Stokes and Euler Equations. Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium: Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
  2. Chorin, A. J. (1967). A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 2, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(67)90037-X
  3. Esfahanian, V. and Akbarzadeh, P. (2009). Advanced investigation on design criteria of a robust, artificial compressibility and local preconditioning method for solving the inviscid incompressible flows. Proceeding of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation, and Applied Optimization, Sharjah, UAE.
  4. Kline, S. J., Coles, D. E., Hirst, E. A., and US Air Force. Office of Scientific Research. (1969). Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers--1968 AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference Proceedings. Stanford: Stanford University. Thermosciences Division.
  5. Kiris, C., Housman, J., and Kwak, D. (2006). Comparison of artificial compressibility methods. In C. Groth and D. W. Zingg, eds. Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin. pp. 475-480.
  6. Langley Research Center (2011). Turbfulence Modeling Resource. http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/ (Accessed Dec 16 2011).
  7. Malan, A. G., Lewis, R. W., and Nithiarasu, P. (2002a). An improved unsteady, unstructured, artificial compressibility, finite volume scheme for viscous incompressible flows. Part I. Theory and implementation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 54, 695-714. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.447
  8. Malan, A. G., Lewis, R. W., and Nithiarasu, P. (2002b). An improved unsteady, unstructured, artificial compressibility, finite volume scheme for viscous incompressible flows. Part II. Application. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 54, 715-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.443
  9. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32, 1598-1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  10. Merkle, C. L. and Athavale, M. (1987). Time-accurate unsteady incompressible flow algorithms based on artificial compressibility. AIAA 8th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. AIAA Paper No. 87-1137.
  11. Michelassi, V., Migliorini, F., and Martelli, F. (1996). Preconditioned scalar approximate factorization method for incompressible fluid flows. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 7, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618569608940768
  12. Mittal, R. (1999). A Fourier-Chebyshev spectral collocation method for simulating flow past spheres and spheroids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 30, 921-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19990815)30:7<921::AID-FLD875>3.0.CO;2-3
  13. Pan, D. and Chakravarthy, S. (1989). Unified formulation for incompressible flows. AIAA 27th Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, NV. AIAA Paper No. 89-0122.
  14. Peyret, R. and Taylor, T. D. (1983). Computational Methods for Fluid Flow. New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 358.
  15. Rahman, M. M. and Siikonen, T. (2008). An artificial compressibility method for viscous incompressible and low Mach number flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 75, 1320-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2302
  16. Roe, P. L. (1981). Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 43, 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
  17. Rogers, S. E. and Kwak, D. (1990). Upwind differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 28, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10382
  18. Roos, F. W. and Willmarth, W. W. (1971). Some experimental results on sphere and disk drag. AIAA Journal, 9, 285-291. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6164
  19. Ryu, S., Lee, S., and Kim, B. (2006). A study of local preconditioning method for compressible low speed flows. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 9, 152-160.
  20. Schlichting, H. (1979). Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Sheard, G. J., Thompson, M. C., and Hourigan, K. (2003). From spheres to circular cylinders: the stability and flow structures of bluff ring wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 492, 147-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003005512
  22. Turkel, E. (1987). Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 72, 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90084-2
  23. Turkel, E. (1992). Review of Preconditioning Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Hampton: Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering. ICASE Report No. 92-74.
  24. Van Leer, B. (1979). Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32, 101-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1

피인용 문헌

  1. Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis of Large Sandwich Panel Structure for Randomly Distributed Wind Load considering Gust Effects vol.23, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.4.318