DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Obligatory Report of the Lien in Real Estate Auction

부동산경매에 있어 유치권 신고의무

  • 박종렬 (광주여자대학교 경찰법학과)
  • Received : 2010.10.20
  • Accepted : 2010.11.30
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

A lienor of the real estate Auction procedure does not associate with the lien report truth in an existing law system, and lienor can be opposed to vendee. Malicious lienor abuses such a principle of law and loses a sale price of the deferred purpose real estate in Auction procedure by convenience of lienor. In addition, there is apt to be a case to let I do debtor and collusion and false return, and the Secured credit swell out greatly. The necessity that liability does lien report to assure Secured credi becoming the formation truth and the undertaking of lien in Auction procedure is practically acute need. I showed the legislation idea which switched present situation investigation improvement and lien by the executive officer in legal mortgage in civil law In addition, it revised introduction and the Civil Execution Act of the lien registration system and solved Obligatory Report of the Lien about lien for a legislation.

Keywords

Real Estate Lien;Auction Procedure;the Closing Period of Demanding Dividend;Secured Credit;Obligatory Report

References

  1. 편집대표 박준서, 주석민법 물권(3), 한국사법행정학회, p.364, 2001.
  2. http://www.goodauction.co.kr
  3. 윤영근, “부동산경매절차에서의 유치권에 관한 연구,” 건국대학교 석사논문, p.28, 2088.
  4. G법무부, 민법(재산편)개정자료집, 법무자료 제269집, (법무심의실, 2004), p.378.
  5. 北川善太郞, 民法の理論と體系, 一粒社, 1987, p.3.
  6. 星野英一, 日本の民法解釋學, /早稻田法學, 제58권3호, p.312 이하, 1982.
  7. 문흥안, 전게서, pp.189-190.
  8. 伊藤昌司, “留置權についで, 法律時報 五二卷一號, p.44, 1980.
  9. Boissonade, Projet de code civil pour l'empire du Japan accompagned'un commentaire, 1891, t. IV, p.186. et s.
  10. Boissnade, Projet de code civil pour l'empire du Japan accompagned'un commentaire, 1891, t. I, p.154 et s.
  11. Boissnade, Projet de code civil pour l'empire du Japan accompagned'un commentaire, 1891, t. IV, p.190.
  12. Boissonade, Projet de code civil pour l'empire du Japan accompagned'un commentaire, 1891, t. III, p.882.
  13. Brissaud, Manuel d histoire au aroit prive p.502, 1908.
  14. Bobes, Le casd' application au aroit ae retention, p.67, 1913.
  15. Laurent, Principe de droit civil, t. 29, 1893, n${\circ}$1284 et s.
  16. Guillouard, Traile de retenticn, 1985, n'54 et s.
  17. Bonnecase, Precis de droit civil, t. II,1938, n${\circ}$93 et s.
  18. Ferron, Note ss. Cass. civ. 26 avrel 1900, S.1901 I. 193
  19. Elekes, De quelques differences dans l'aplication du droit de retention d'apres la jurisprudence franclaise et allemennde, p.140, 1929.
  20. Planiol et Riport, Traite pratique du droit civil, t. IV, par Esmein, n${\circ}$456
  21. Becque, Note ss. Aix, 17 aril 1942, J. C.P.1942. II 1874
  22. 심헌섭, “법의 효력과 실효성” 서울대학교 법학, 제44권 4호(통권 129호), 서울대학교 법학연구소, 2003, pp.373-377, 2003.
  23. 법원실무제요 민사소송 [III], 법원행정처, p.4, 2005.
  24. 이시윤, 신민사집행법, 박영사, 2004, p.223
  25. 송기현 기자, “허위 유치권을 이용, 경매브로커 구속”, 검찰인터넷방송 SPBS, 3월 16일자 전게 기사문 참조, 2009.
  26. 이성환, “경매에서의 유치권 실무”, 법률신문, 9. 3.자, p.15, 2009.