Effects of Specific Exercises on Motor Function Recovery In Rats With Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

척수 손상 쥐에 실시한 특정 과제 운동이 운동 행동에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2010.08.26
  • Accepted : 2010.12.09
  • Published : 2011.02.19

Abstract

This study was implemented to verify the feasibility of motor function recovery and the appropriate period for therapy. The research began with spinal laminectomy of 40 white rats of Sprague-Dawley breed and induced them spinal crush injury. Following results were obtained by using the modified Tarlov test (MTT), Basso, Beattle, Bresnahan locomotor rating scale (EBB scale) and modified inclined plate test (MIPT). First, the measurement using the MTT confirm that the most severe aggravation and degeneration of functions are observed two days after induced injury, and no sign of neuromotor function recovery. Second, better scores were achieved by open-ground movement group on BBB locomotor rating scale test, and weight-bearing on inclined plate group show better performance on MIPT. Third, both BBB and MIPT scale manifested the peak of motor function recovery during 16th day after the injury and turn into gradual recovery gradient during 16th to 24th. Fourth, the control group showed functional recovery, however, the level of recovery was less significant when compared with group open-ground movement group and weight-bearing on inclined plate group. Hence, it was clearly manifested that the lumbar region of the spinal cord had shown the best performance when its functions were measured after the execution of specific physical training; therefore it indicated the possibility of learning specific task even in damaged lumbar regions. Thus it is expected to come out with better and more effective functional recovery if concentrated physical therapy was applied starting 4 days after the injury till 16 days, which is the period of the most active recovery.

References

  1. Bartholdi D, Schwab ME. Degeneration and regeneration of axons in the lesioned spinal cord. Physiol Rev. 1996;76(2):319-370. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.319
  2. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan, JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1995.12.1
  3. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan, JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1995.12.1
  4. Basso DM. Neuroanatomical substrates of functional recovery after experimental spinal cord injury: Implications of basic science research for human spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2000;80(8):808-817.
  5. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal turd injury: A series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000;80(7):688-700.
  6. Behrmann DL, Bresnhan JC, Beattie MS. Modeling of acute spinal cord injury in the ret: Neuroprotection and enhanced recovery with methyprednisolone, U-74006F and YM-14673. Exp Neurol. 1994;126(1):61-75. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1994.1042
  7. Behrmann DL, Bresnahan JC, Beattie MS, et al. Spinal cord injury produced by consistent mechanical displacement of the cord in rats: Behavioral and histologic analysis. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(3):197-217. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1992.9.197
  8. Bergeron L, Yuan J. Sealing one's fate: Control of cell death in neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998;8(1):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80008-1
  9. Bizzi E, Tresch MC, Saltiel P, et al. New perspectives on spinal motor systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1(2):101-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/35039000
  10. De Leon RD, Hodgson JA, Roy RR, et al. Full weight-bearing hindlimb standing following stand training in the adult. spinal cat. J Neurophysiology. 1998;80(1):83-91. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.83
  11. De Leon RD, Hodgson JA, Roy RR, et al. Retention of hindlimb stepping ability in adult spinal cats after the cessation of step training. J Neurophysiology 1999;81(1):85-94. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.85
  12. De Leon RD, Tamaki H, Hodgson JA, et al. Hindlimb locomotor and postural training modulates glycinergic inhibition in the spinal cord of the adult spinal cat. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82(1):359-369. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.1.359
  13. Dimitrijevic MR, Gerasimenko Y, Pinter MM. Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;860:360-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09062.x
  14. Duysens J, Mulder T, Van de Crommert HW, et al. Neural central of locomotion: Sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training. Gait Posture. 1998;7(3):251-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(98)00010-1
  15. Edgerton VR., de Leon RD, Tillakaratne N, et al. Use-dependent plasticity in spinal stepping and standing. Adv J Neurol. 1997;72:233-247.
  16. Edgerton VR., de Leon RD, Tillakaratne N, et al. Use-dependent plasticity in spinal stepping and standing. Adv J Neurol. 1997;72:233-247.
  17. Gerlinde A, Kleina A, Papazogloub A, et al. Walking pattern analysis after unilateral 6-OHDA lesion and transplantation of foetal dopaminergic progenitor cells in rats. Behav Brain Res 2009;199(2):317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.007
  18. Goldberger ME, Robinson GA. The development and recovery of motor function in spinal cats. II. Pharmacological enhancement of recovery. Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238858
  19. Harkema SJ, Hurley SL, Patel UK, et al. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:797-811. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.797
  20. Klishko AN, Lemay MA, Markin SN, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA, Shevtsova NA. Afferent control of locomotor CPG: Insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1198:21-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05435.x
  21. Krenz NR, Weaver LC. Sprouting of primary afferent fibers after spinal cord transection in the rat. Neuroscience. 1998;85(2):443-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00622-2
  22. Liu XZ, Xu XM, Hu R, et al. Neuronal and glial apoptosis after traumatic spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 1997;17(14): 5395-5406.
  23. McCrea DA, Rybak IA. Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res Rev. 2008;57(1):134-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.006
  24. Popovich PG, Stokes BT, Whitacre CC. Concept of autoimmunity following spinal cord injury: Possible roles for T lymphocytes in the traumatizad central nervous system. J Neurosci Res. 1996;45(4):349-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960815)45:4<349::AID-JNR4>3.0.CO;2-9
  25. Popovich PG, Wei P, Stokes BT. Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats. J Comp Neurol. 1997;377(3):443-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970120)377:3<443::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-S
  26. Rivlin AS, Tator CH. Objective clinical assessment of motor function after experimental spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurosurg. 1977;47(4):577-581. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1977.47.4.0577
  27. Rossignol S. Plasticity of connections underlying locomotor recovery after central and/or peripheral lesions in the adult mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361(1473):1647-1671. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1889
  28. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating research into clinical practice. Baltimore, Lippincott Williaams & Wilkins, 2005.
  29. Tanabe Y, William C, Jessell TM. Specification of motor neuron indentity by the MNR2 homeodomain protein. Cell. 1998;95(1):67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81783-3
  30. Weirich SD, Cotler HB, Narayana PA, et al. Histopathologic correlation of magnetic resonance imaging signal pattents in a spinal cord injury model. Spine. 1990;15(7):630-638. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199007000-00004
  31. Wolf SL, LeCraw DE, Barton LA. Comparison of motor copy and targeted biofeedback training techniques for restitution of upper extremity function among patients with neurologic disorders. Phys Ther. 1989;69(9):719-735. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/69.9.719