DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

VOC Emissions from Automotive Painting and Their Control: A Review

Kim, Byung-R.

  • 투고 : 2011.02.01
  • 심사 : 2011.02.28
  • 발행 : 2011.03.30

초록

During automotive painting, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with the paint solvents are emitted to the atmosphere. Most VOC emissions come from spraying operations via the use of solvent-based paints, as the spraybooth air picks up gaseous solvent compounds and overspray paint materials. The VOCs consist of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, ketones, esters, alcohols, and glycolethers. Most VOCs (some hydrophilic VOCs are captured and retained in the water.) are captured by an adsorption system and thermally oxidized. In this paper, the processes involved in automotive painting and in VOC control are reviewed. The topics include: painting operations (briefly), the nature of VOCs, VOC-control processes (adsorption, absorption, biological removal, and thermal oxidation) and energy recovery from VOCs using a fuel reformer and a fuel cell, and the beneficial use of paint sludge.

키워드

Adsorption;Automotive;Paint solvents;Painting;Thermal oxidation;Volatile organic compounds

참고문헌

  1. United States Congress. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Title III. Hazardous air pollutants. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1990.
  2. Matheson RR Jr. 20th- to 21st-century technological challenges in soft coatings. Science 2002;297:976-979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075707
  3. Meschievitz T, Rahangdale Y, Pearson R. U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR) low-emission paint consortium: a unique approach to powder painting technology development.Met. Finishing 1995;93:26-28.
  4. Papasavva S, Kia S, Claya J, Gunther R. Characterization of automotive paints: an environmental impact analysis. Prog. Org. Coat. 2001;43:193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(01)00182-5
  5. Kim BR, Kalis EM, Adams JA. Integrated emissions management for automotive painting operations. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001;73:1277-1280. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173081277
  6. Kim BR, Adams JA, Klaver PR, et al. Biological removal of gaseous VOCs from automotive painting operations. J. Environ. Eng. 2000;126:745-753. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:8(745)
  7. Kim BR, Kalis EM, DeWulf T, Andrews KM. Henry’s law constants for paint solvents and their implications on volatile organic compound emissions from automotive painting. Water Environ. Res. 2000;72:65-74. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143000X137121
  8. Chang CT, Jeng FT. Study on the strategies of waste solvent minimization in automobile production industry. In: Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 91st Annual Meeting and Exhibition; 1998 Jun 14-18; San Diego, CA, USA. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association; 1998.
  9. Chang CT, Lee CH, Wu YP, Jeng FT. Assessment of the strategies for reducing volatile organic compound emissions in the automotive industry in Taiwan. Resour. Conservat. Recycl. 2002;34:117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00096-9
  10. Kolta T. Selecting equipment to control air pollution from automotive painting operations. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1992. Report No.: 920189.
  11. Yuan B, Shao M, Lu S, Wang B. Source profiles of volatile organic compounds associated with solvent use in Beijing, China. Atmos. Environ. 2010;44:1919-1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.014
  12. Anderson JE, Gilland RD, Adams JA, et al. Recovering VOCs from paint spraybooth air using an activated-carbon fluidized-bed adsorber for subsequent power generation. In: Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 99th Annual Conference & Exhibition; 2006 Jun 20-23; New Orleans, LA, USA. Paper No. 241. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association; 2006.
  13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Control of volatile organic emissions from existing stationary sources. Volume II: Source coating of cans, coils, papers, fabrics, automobiles, and light-duty trucks. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1977. Report No.: EPA-450/2-77-008.
  14. Gupta A, Hussey F. Using carbon and zeolite for VOC removal: controlling VOC emissions at paint facilities. In: Engineering Society of Detroit; Society of Automotive Engineers. Proceedings of the Advanced Coatings Technology Conference; 1997 Apr 7-10; Detroit, MI, USA. Ann Arbor, MI: Engineering Society of Detroit; 1997.
  15. Wherrett M, Ryan PA. VOC emissions from industrial painting processes as a source of fuel cell energy. In: Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 96th Annual Conference and Exhibition; 2004 Jun 21-24; Indianapolis, IN, USA. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association; 2004.
  16. Haack LP, Marano RS, Riley TL, Levine SP. Gas-chromatographic technique for the on-line evaluation of solvent emission abatement devices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981;15:1463-1467. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00094a006
  17. Tao WH, Yang TCK, Chang YN, Chang LK, Chung TW. Effect of moisture on the adsorption of volatile organic compounds by zeolite $13{\times}$. J. Environ. Eng. 2004;130:1210-1216. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:10(1210)
  18. Popescu M, Joly JP, Carre J, Danatoiu C. Dynamical adsorption and temperature-programmed desorption of VOCs (toluene, butyl acetate and butanol) on activated carbons. Carbon 2003;41:739-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00391-3
  19. Cannon BJ. Dual-chamber RTO oxidizers provide cost-effective VOC compliance for metal finishers and coaters. Met. Finishing 2003;101:53-56.
  20. Matros YS, Bunimovich GA, Strots VO, Roach CR, Lorensen CM, Wherrett MR. Retrofitting a regenerative thermal oxidizer in an automotive assembly plant. Met. Finishing 1999;97:10-16.
  21. Mir L, Zahka J. Process of removal of solvent vapors. United State patent US 4,65,642. 1981.
  22. Noyes R. Handbook of pollution control processes. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications; 1991.
  23. Kim BR, Pingel LJ. Removal of toluene from air using PAC/ water slurry reactor. J. Environ. Eng. 1989;115:1025-1045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1989)115:5(1025)
  24. Pierucci S, Del Rosso R, Bombardi D, Concu A, Lugli G. An innovative sustainable process for VOCs recovery from spray paint booths. Energy 2005;30:1377-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.02.017
  25. Kim BR, Podsiadlik DH, Yeh DH, Salmeen IT, Briggs LM. Evaluating the conversion of an automotive paint spraybooth scrubber to an activated-sludge system for removing paint volatile organic compounds from air. Water Environ. Res. 1997;69:1211-1221. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143097X125966
  26. Alonso C, Suidan MT, Kim BR, Kim BJ. Dynamic mathematical model for the biodegradation of VOCs in a biofilter: biomass accumulation study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998;32:3118-3123.
  27. Moe WM, Qi B. Performance of a fungal biofilter treating gasphase solvent mixtures during intermittent loading. Water Res. 2004;38:2258-2267.
  28. Zhu X, Suidan MT, Pruden A, et al. Effect of substrate Henry’s law constant on biofilter performance. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004;54:409-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470918
  29. Qi B, Moe WM, Kinney KA. Treatment of paint spray booth off-gases in a fungal biofilter. J. Environ. Eng. 2005;131:180-189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(180)
  30. Boswell J, John P, Mundorff K, Gurren T. Air emissions from the automobile manufacturing industry: a bio-oxidation pilot study of paint emissions control. In: Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 100th Annual Conference and Exhibition; 2007 Jun 26-29; Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association; 2007.
  31. Kim BR, Zinbo M, Adams JA, Young WC. Nonbiodegradable organic compounds found in automotive spraybooth scrubber water. Water Environ. Res. 2000;72:405-412. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143000X137932
  32. Patel-Predd P. Carmakers opt for "greener" paints. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:6535. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062801t
  33. FCE helps Ford turn paint solvent into clean energy. Fuel Cells Bull. 2007;(11):7.
  34. Kim BR, Kalis EM, Salmeen IT, et al. Evaluating paint-sludge chars for adsorption of selected paint solvents. J. Environ. Eng. 1996;122:532-539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:6(532)
  35. Nakouzi S, Mielewski D, Ball JC, et al. A novel approach to paint sludge recycling: Reclaiming of paint sludge components as ceramic composites and their applications in reinforcement of metals and polymers. J. Mater. Res. 1998;13:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1998.0008
  36. Narula CK, Kim BR, Salmeen IT. Pyrolytic conversion of paint sludge to useful materials. United State patent US 5,543,367. 1996 Aug 6.
  37. Sanghvi H, Massingill JL Jr. Recycling paint overspray. J. Coating. Technol. 2002;74:143-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697954
  38. Arce R, Galán B, Coz A, Andrés A, Viguri JR. Stabilization/solidification of an alkyd paint waste by carbonation of wastelime based formulations. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;177:428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.050

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compound Characteristics in Specific Areas in Korea Using Long-Term Monitoring Data vol.17, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  2. vol.46, pp.1-3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  3. Adsorption and Desorption of Mixtures of Organic Vapors on Beaded Activated Carbon vol.46, pp.15, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  4. Effect of Adsorption and Regeneration Temperature on Irreversible Adsorption of Organic Vapors on Beaded Activated Carbon vol.46, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  5. CFD-based modeling and design for energy-efficient VOC emission reduction in surface coating systems vol.15, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  6. Dichloromethane emissions from automotive manufacturing industry in Iran: case study of the SAIPA automotive manufacturing company vol.95, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  7. Application of ZnO–Fe3O4 Nanocomposite on the Removal of Azo Dye from Aqueous Solutions: Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies vol.225, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  8. Comparative removal of two textile dyes from aqueous solution by adsorption onto marine-source waste shell: Kinetic and isotherm studies vol.31, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  9. Modeling Competitive Adsorption of Mixtures of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Fixed-Bed of Beaded Activated Carbon vol.48, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001
  10. A Novel Technique for Determining the Adsorption Capacity and Breakthrough Time of Adsorbents Using a Noncontact High-Resolution Microwave Resonator Sensor vol.51, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.1.001