DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Simulation Studies on Generalized Binomial Models

일반화 이항모형의 적합도 평가

Baik, E.J.;Kim, K.Y.
백은주;김기영

  • Received : 20110300
  • Accepted : 20110300
  • Published : 2011.07.31

Abstract

Comparative studies on generalized binomial models (Moon, 2003; Ng, 1989; Paul, 1985; Kupper and Haseman, 1978; Griffiths, 1973) are restrictive in that the models compared are rather limited and MSE of the estimates is the only measure considered for the model adequacy. This paper is aimed to report simulation results which provide possible guidelines for selecting a proper model. We examine Pearson type of goodness-of-fit statistic to its degrees of freedom and AIC for the overall model quality. MSE and Bias of the individual estimates are also considered as the component fit measures. Performance of some models varies widely for a certain range of the parameter space while most of the models are quite competent. Our evaluation shows that the Extended Beta-Binomial model (Prentice, 1986) turns out to be particularly favorable in the point that it provides consistently excellent fit almost all over the values of the intra-class correlation coefficient and the probability of success.

Keywords

Correlated binomial data;generalized binomial models;goodness-of-fit

References

  1. 문명상 (1999). 일반화 이항분포모형에서 시행간 종속성 규정모수의 추정량 비교연구, Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 10, 279-288.
  2. Akaike, H. (1973). A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  3. Altham, P. M. E. (1978). Two generalizations of the binomial distribution, Applied Statistics, 27, 162-167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346943
  4. Bahadur, R. R. (1961). A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items, In: Studies in Item A analysis and Prediction, H. Solomon(ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford California.
  5. Danaher, P. J. and Hardie, G. S. (2005). Bacon with your eggs? Applications of a New Bivariate Beta-Binomial Distribution, The American Statistician, 59, 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X70939
  6. Drezner, Z. and Farnum, N. (1993). A generalized binomial distribution, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 22, 3051-3063. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929308831202
  7. Emrich, L. J. and Piedmonte, M. R. (1991). A method for generating high-dimensional multivariate binary variates, The American Statistician, 45, 302-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684460
  8. Griffiths, D. A. (1973). Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta-binomial distribution and an application to the household distribution of the total number of cases of a disease, Biometrics, 29, 637-648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529131
  9. Kupper, L. L. and Haseman, J. K. (1978). The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments, Biometrics, 34, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529589
  10. Lancaster, H. O. (1969). The Chi-Squared Distribution, Wiley, London.
  11. Moon, M. S. (2003). Comparison of three binomial-related models in the estimation of correlations, The Korean Communications in Statistics, 10, 585-594. https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2003.10.2.585
  12. Ng, T. H. (1989). A new class of modified binomial distributions with applications to certain toxicological experiments, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 18, 3477-3492. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928908830104
  13. Paul, S. R. (1987). On the beta-correlated binomial(BCD) distribution- A three parameter generalization of the binomial distribution, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 16, 1473-1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928708829449
  14. Prentice, R. L. (1986). Binary regression using an extended beta-binomial distribution, with discussion of correlation induced by covariate measurement errors, The American Statistician, 81, 394, 321-327.
  15. Williams, D. A. (1975). The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity, Biometrics, 31, 949-952. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529820

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 고려대학교