DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Organizational Politics and Social Network on Knowledge Transfer

지식이전에 영향을 미치는 조직의 정치성향과 사회네트워크

  • Received : 2011.06.07
  • Accepted : 2011.06.17
  • Published : 2011.06.28

Abstract

This study explains the knowledge transfer process by exploring the significant factors affecting knowledge transfer within an organization from a socio-political perspective. Knowledge transfer occurs in various social contexts, within individuals and groups, and, thus, is closely linked to inter-organizational politics and social network in an organization. By conceptualizing knowledge as a socio-political process, this paper applies organizational politic theory and social network theory to knowledge management area. Here the paper shows that both organizational politics and social network such as in-group and out-group's tie strength have a significant effect on knowledge transfer. In addition, the study empirically verifies that knowledge management system has a moderating effect on the in-group's tie strength and knowledge transfer.

Keywords

Knowledge Transfer;Organizational Politics;Social Network;Knowledge Management System

References

  1. S. Newell, M. Robertson, H. Scarbrough, and J. A. Swan, Managing Knowledge Work, London: Palgrave, MacMillan, 2002.
  2. A. Drory and T. Romm, The Definition of Organizational Politics: A Review, Human Relations, Vol.43, No.11, pp.1133-1154, 1992.
  3. W. Tsai, Social Structure of "Coopetition," Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing, Organization Science, Vol.13, No.2, pp.179-190, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
  4. N. R. Quigley, P.E. Tesluk, E. A. Locke, and K. Bartol, Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge haring and Performance, Organization Science, Vol.18, No.1, pp.71-88, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0223
  5. W. R. King and W. J. Lekse, Deriving Managerial Benefit from Knowledge Search: A Paradigm Shift?, Information & Management, Vol.43, No.7, pp.874-883, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.08.005
  6. W. M. McLure and S. Faraj, Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp.35-57, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
  7. D. G. Ko, L. J. Kirsch, and W. R. King, Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp.59-85, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148668
  8. H. Scarbrough, The Management of Expertise, London: Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1996.
  9. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowiz, Social Structure: Network Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  10. D. L. Rulke and J. Galaskiewicz, Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance, Management Science, Vol.46, No.5, pp.612-625, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052
  11. G. R. Ferris and K. M. Kacmar, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of management, Vol.18, No.1, pp.93-116, 1992.
  12. R. J. Cropanzano, A. Howes, Grandy, and P. Toth, The Relationship of Organizational Politics and Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes, and Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, No.2, pp.159-180, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2<159::AID-JOB795>3.0.CO;2-D
  13. T. E. Deal and A. A. Kennedy, Corporate Culture: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, M.A: Addison-Wesley, 1982.
  14. W. J. Orlikowski, CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investing Incremental and Radical Change in Systems Development, MIS Quarterly, Vol.17, No.3, pp.309-340, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/249774
  15. B. Wellman, Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance, in Wellman, B. and S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach (pp.19-61), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  16. R. S. Burt, The Contingent Value of Social Capital, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.339-365, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923
  17. B. Kogut and U. Zander, What Do Firms Do? Coordination, Identity and Learning, Organization Science, Vol.7, No.5, pp.502-518, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502
  18. S. Shane and D. Cable, Network ties, reputation and the financing of new ventures, Management Science, Vol.48, No.3, pp.364-381, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731
  19. C. L. Dhanaraj, A. Marjorie, H. K. Steensma, and L. Tihnyi, Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in IJVs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact onss aformance, Journal of International Business Studies, 35, pp.428-442, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098
  20. D. Z. Levin and R. Cross, The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer, Management Science, Vol.50, No.11, pp.1477-1490, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
  21. C. O'Dell and C. J. Grayson, If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices, California Management Review, Vol.40,No.3, pp.154-174, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165948
  22. G. Szulanski, Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, pp.27-43, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/2486989
  23. W. G. Sumner, Folkway: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals, New York: Ginn & Co, 1940.
  24. H. C. Triandis, The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts, Psychological Review, 96, pp.506-520, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506
  25. M. Granovetter, The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp.1360-1380, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  26. H. Ajfel, Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social in Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  27. A. Aron and E. N. Aron, Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction, New York: Hemisphere, 1986.
  28. E. J. Lawler, An Affect Theory of Social Exchange, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.107, No.2, pp.321-352, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1086/324071
  29. E. Vigoda, Organizational Politics, Job Attitudes, and Work Outcomes: Exploration and Implications for the Public Sector, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.57, No.3, pp.326-347, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1742
  30. M. B. Brewer and R. M. Kramer, "The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior," Annual Review of Psychology, 36, pp.219-243, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.001251
  31. H. M. Oh, Chung, and G. Lavianca, Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, No.6, pp.860-875, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159627
  32. 강소라, 김효근, 나와 우리를 위한 지식이전 이론: 지식을 이전(Knowledge Transfer)하는 조직 구성원의 심리적 상태에 관한 근거이론적 접근, 경영학연구, 제34권, 제3호, pp.743-785, 2005.
  33. D. O. Sears, Symbolic Racism in Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, in Katz, A. and D.A. Taylor (Eds), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy (pp.123-151), New York: Free Press, 1988.
  34. G. R. Ferris, D. D. Frink, D. P. Bhawuk, J. Zhou, and D. C. Gilmore, Reaction of Diverse Groups to Politics in the Workplace, Journal of management, Vol.22, No.1, pp.23-44, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200102
  35. A. H. Gold, A. Malhotra, and A. H. Segars, Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No.1, pp.185-214, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  36. F. J. Riggins and H. Rhee, Developing the Learning Network Using Extranets, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.4, No.1, pp.65-83, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1999.11518357
  37. P. S. Goodman and E. D. Darr, Computer-Aided Systems & Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments, MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, No.4, pp.417-440, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/249550
  38. J. H. Wu and Y. M. Wang, Measuring KMS Success: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean's Model, Information & Management, 43, pp.728-739, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
  39. S. S. Kleine and S. M. Baker, An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, pp.1-35, 2004.
  40. 최병구, "지식경영 영향요소, 프로세스, 조직성과: 통합적 실증적 고찰", 한국과학기술원, 박사학위논문, 2002.
  41. 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형에 있어서 적합도 선정기준과 그 근거", 한국 심리학회지, 19, pp.161-177, 2000.
  42. L. T. Hu and P. M. Bentler, Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, pp.424-453, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  43. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  44. R. A. Ping, FAQ's about latent variable interactions and quadratics in survey data, Retrieved from http://www.wright.edu/ -robert.ping/Faq.doc, 2003a.
  45. R. A. Ping, Latent Variable Research, Retrieved from http://www.wright.edu/ -robert.ping/, 2003b.
  46. 이현정, 김효근, 전수자의 심리적 특성이 지식이전에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -우리의식, 윤리성, 자기이익 및 감정을 중심으로, 경영학연구, 제37권, 제1호, pp.1-34, 2008.
  47. E. Wenger, Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  48. J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
  49. C. M. Fiol and M. A. Lyles, Organizational Learning, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.4, pp.803-813, 1985.

Cited by

  1. The effect of in/out group formation and the tie strength on the knowledge transfer and performance vol.14, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.9.4227