Performance Problems Analysis and Establishment of Action Strategies for Program Educational Objective Improvement

프로그램 교육목표 개선을 위한 수행문제분석 및 추진전략 수립

  • Received : 2011.01.28
  • Accepted : 2011.05.04
  • Published : 2011.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze performance problems in establishing and improving program educational objectives (PEO) and to set up action strategies for the civil engineering program at the A university. To fulfill the purpose, according to the typical needs analysis model, research problems were defined, current conditions and desired conditions were identified, discrepancies and their reasons were examined, and action strategies were derived. Current conditions and desired conditions were identified by analyzing the A civil engineering program's self study report, conducting surveys and interviews with constituents. After the discrepancies and the reasons were examined, performance problems and field force analysis were conducted to draw short term and long term action strategies to improve PEO. Short term action strategies were to announce PEO to current students, to hold faculty seminars to establish and to improve PEO, to renew the list of constituents regularly, to composite an annual milestone, to define roles of the committees, and to enforce educational opportunity toward industrial advisory board members. For the long term strategies, improvement and documentation of PEO assessment system, collection and analysis of constituents' suggestions, establishment of effective accreditation support system, and arrangement of compensation system for the faculties who are in charge of engineering education accreditation responsibility.

Keywords

program objectives;performance problems analysis;action strategies

References

  1. 김명랑, 윤우영, 김복기 (2008). 한국공학교육인증의 '프로그램 교육목표' 달성을 위한 평가 모형 개발. 공학교육연구, 11(2):42-49.
  2. 남한호 (2007). 교육목표의 의미와 국사 학습목표의 제시 유형. 역사교육논집, 38: 191-231.
  3. 박영택 (2000). 공공행정부문 Single PPM 품질혁신, Single PPM 품질혁신추진본부.
  4. 이강우, 신연순 (2009). 교육목표와 학습성과 평가를 통한 프로그램 운영 방안에 대한 연구. 공학교육연구, 12(2): 71-82.
  5. 인하대학교 공과대학 사회기반시스템공학부 토목공학전공 (2010). 2010년도 공학교육인증 자체평가보고서: 토목공학전문 프로그램.
  6. 정범모 (1972). 교육과 교육학. 서울 : 배영사.
  7. 진성희, 김태현 (2010). 공과계열 대학생을 위한 맞춤형 테크노 리더십 캠프 프로그램 개발. 공학교육연구, 13(6): 111-121.
  8. 한국공학교육인증원 (2010). 2010년 4차 평가자 교육 워크숍자료집.
  9. Daniel, D. R. (1961). Management Information Crisis. Harvard Business Review, 39(5): 111-121.
  10. FSU (2003). Engineering Criteria 2002-2003 Program Self-Study Report. Mechanical Engineering. Florida State University.
  11. University of Iowa (2008). ABET Self-Study Report. Chemical Engineering, University of Iowa.
  12. OSU (2005). ABET Program Self Study Report. Materials Science and Engineering, Ohio State University.
  13. Purdue University (2007). Program Self-Study Report. School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University.
  14. Raymond, S. (1997). The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese Ethnology. Human Organization, 56(2): 233-237. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655
  15. RHIT (2006). Program Self-Study Report. Mechanical Engineering Department, Rose-Hulman Institute Technology.
  16. Rockart, J., & Bullen, C. (1981) A primer on critical success factors. Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper No. 69. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  17. Rover, D. T. (2008). Engineering education in a global context, Journal of engineering education, 97(1): 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00958.x
  18. Tyler, R. W. (1996). 진영은 역. Tyler의 교육과정과 수업지도의 기본원리. 양서원.