- Volume 25 Issue 6
In this paper, we propose a statistic to measure investor sentiment. It is a usual phenomenon that an asymmetric volatility (referred to as the leverage effect) is observed in financial time series and is more sensitive to bad news rather than good news. In a bubble state, investors tend to continuously speculate on financial instruments because of optimism about the future; subsequently, prices tend to abnormally increase for a long time. Estimators of the transformation parameter and the skewness based on Yeo-Johnson transformed GARCH models are employed to check whether a bubble or abnormality exist. We verify the appropriacy of the proposed interpretation through analyses of KOSPI and NIKKEI.
GARCH model;leverage effect;skewness;Yeo-Johnson transformation
- Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
- Box, G. E. P. and Cox, C. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211-252.
- Camerer, C. (1989). Bubbles and fads in asset prices, Journal of Economic Surveys, 3, 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1989.tb00056.x
- Diba, B. T. and Grossman, H. I. (1988). The theory of rational bubbles in stock prices, The Economic Journal, 98, 746-754. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233912
- Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of the United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
- Flood, R. P. and Hodrick, R. J. (1990). On testing for speculative bubbles, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 85-101.
- Garber, P. M. (1990). Famous first bubbles, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.35
- Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of nominal excess returns on stocks, Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
- Henry, O. (1998). Modelling the asymmetry of stock market volatility. Applied Financial Economics, 8, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/096031098333122
- John, J. A. and Draper, N. R. (1980). An alternative family of transformations, Applied Statistics, 29, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986305
- Ma, Y. and Kanas, A. (2004). Intrinsic bubbles revisited: Evidence from nonlinear cointegration and forecasting, Journal of Forecasting, 23, 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.909
- Mardia, K. V. (1980). Tests of univariate and multivariate normality, Handbook of Statistics, 1, 279-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(80)01011-5
- Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach, Econometrica, 59, 347-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
- Spence, J. (1820). Anecdotes, Observations, and Characters, of Books and Men, Edited by Singer, S. S., London.
- van Zwet, W. R. (1964). Convex Transformations of Random Variables, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.
- Wu, Y. (1997). Rational bubbles in the stock market: Accounting for the U.S. stock-price volatility, Economic Inquiry, 35, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01912.x
- Yeo, I. K. and Johnson, R. A. (2000). A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry, Biometrika, 87, 954-959. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.954
- Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6
Supported by : Sookmyung Women's University