여름철 무강우 시 들잔디 옥상녹화 식재지반에 따른 관수주기 및 관수량 산정

DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주진희;배규태;김원태;윤용한
Ju, Jin-Hee;Bae, Gyu-Tae;Kim, Won-Tae;Yoon, Yong-Han

  • 투고 : 2011.09.22
  • 심사 : 2012.03.08
  • 발행 : 2012.03.31

초록

The purpose of this study was to identify the irrigation intervals and the amount of suitable growing substrate needed to achieve the desired shallow-extensive green roof system during a dry summer in Korea. In terms of treatment, three types (SL, $P_6P_2L_2$, $P_4P_4L_2$) with varying soil mixture ratios and two types (15 cm, 25 cm) with varying soil depths were created. The results have been analyzed after measuring growth and soil water contents. The difference of growth by treatment was significant in terms of green coverage, height, leaf width and photosynthesis. In measurement of chlorophyll content, no difference was detected when measured against soil depth. According to the growth measurement of Zoysia japonica with respect to differing soil mixture ratios in the 15 cm-deep treatment, a statistical difference was detected at the 0.05 significance level in photosynthesis. In case of green coverage, height, chlorophyll content and leaf width, no statistical significance was observed. In case of the 25 cm-deep treatment, a statistical significance was observed in height and photosynthesis. In terms of green coverage, chlorophyll content and leaf width, no statistical significance was detected. In comparisons of soil moisture tension and soil water contents, the irrigation interval and amount were 8 days and 14.9 L in the SL (15 cm) treatment, respectively. The irrigation interval showed for 10 days a 1.3-fold increase, and the irrigation amount was 27.4 L 1.8-fold more than SL (25 cm), respectively. For $P_6P_2L_2$ (15 cm) treatment, the irrigation interval and amount were 12 days and 20.7 L, respectively. However, an irrigation interval under $P_6P_2L_2$ (25 cm) was for 15 days 1.3 times longer than $P_6P_2L_2$ (15 cm), and an irrigation amount of 40 L was 1.9 times more than that under $P_6P_2L_2$ (15 cm). In $P_4P_4L_2$ (15 cm) treatment, it was indicated that the irrigation interval was 15 days, and the irrigation amount was 19.2 L. It was not needed to irrigate for 16 days under $P_4P_4L_2$ (25 cm) treatment during the dry summer and the longest no-rain periods. The irrigation interval and amount under $P_4P_4L_2$ were 1.8-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively, more than SL treatment as affected by soil mixture ratio. Comparatively $P_4P_4L_2$ had more 1.3-fold and 0.9-fold in irrigation interval and amount more than $P_6P_2L_2$. Therefore, it can be noted that different soil depth and soil mixture ratios had a significant effect on the irrigation interval and amount.

키워드

Soil moisture tension;Water management;Zoysia japonica

참고문헌

  1. 김기돈, 2003, 토양수분조절과 저단밀식재배가 토마토의 수량 및 품질에 미치는 영향, 석사학위논문, 배재대학교.
  2. 김세종, 박준홍, 오동식, 송관철, 2001, 수분스트레스가 작약의 생육과 수량에 미치는 영향, 한국토양비료학회지, 34, 199-204.
  3. 김이열, 2003, 코코피트와 피트모스의 특성, 토양과 비료, 13, 14-21.
  4. 남효훈, 권미경, 성전중, 한윤열, 2010, 토양수분 또는 차광에 따른 벌개미취의 광합성 반응, 한국원예기술학회지, 28, 125.
  5. 방광자, 주진희, 김선혜, 2004, 옥상조경용 인공배합토에 서 토심 및 관수주기에 따른 몇몇 자생식물의 생육특성, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 7, 75-83.
  6. 어양준, 2007, 저관수형 옥상녹화에서 수분과 양분변화 에 따른 두메부추의 생장변화, 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교.
  7. 이재필, 한인송, 주영규, 윤원종, 정조일, 장진혁, 김두환, 2003, 옥상녹화에 적합한 지반, 점적 관수 및 잔디선정, 한국잔디학회지, 17, 155-163.
  8. 정강호, 2007, 작물을 재배할 때 좋은 물관리 방법, 토양과 비료, 29, 19-28.
  9. 최희선, 이용범, 이혜진, 김귀곤, 2003, 인공지반녹지의 토심 및 관리형태에 따른 비비추의 생육, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 6, 1-7.
  10. Derek, W., Jeremy, T. L., 2008, Water uptake in green roof microcosms: Effects of plant species and water availability, Ecol. Eng., 33, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.008
  11. Jon, M. W., Christopher, K. W., 1998, Soil water and root growth, Hortscience, 33, 951-959.
  12. Saiz, S., Kennedy, C., Bass, B., Pressnail K., 2006, Comparative life cycle assessment of standard and green roofs, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4312-4316. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0517522
  13. 조인상, 1989, 토성 및 유효토심의 차이가 토양수분 변화에 미치는 영향, 농시연보, 31, 6-13.

피인용 문헌

  1. 1. Effects of Geohumus Mixed with Artificial Soil on Soil Water Retention and Plant Stress Response vol.19, pp.1, 2016, doi:10.5322/JES.2012.21.3.289