DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Writing Education Standards for Secondary School Science Teachers

중등 과학교사 글쓰기 교육 기준 탐색

  • Received : 2011.11.08
  • Accepted : 2012.02.02
  • Published : 2012.02.29

Abstract

There is growing recognition that secondary students must be given the opportunity to write in their science classrooms as well as in scientific inquiry based learning situations, yet the development of writing education standards for secondary school science teachers still needs to be addressed. The primary objective of this research was to explore the writing education standard for secondary school science teachers. The research objective was attained through the use of literature analyses. Drawing upon those results of the related literature analyses, this study suggests a list of writing education standards for secondary school science teachers. The list consists of 17 education standards and includes 42 sub-standards in total across four education areas.

Keywords

science writing;science writing standards;science writing heuristic;science teacher education

References

  1. 강명구, 김상현, 김재영, 김재호, 김준성, 김희준, 오윤선, 이경오, 이상원, 정병기, 정윤석 (2008). 과학기술 글쓰기. 서울대학교출판부.
  2. 강석우.이상헌.최형강.하병학.하정옥.황성근(2009). 대학생을 위한 과학 글쓰기. 아카넷.
  3. 교육과학기술부(2011). 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 과학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-61호. http://cutis.mest.go.kr/main.jsp?gCd=S02&siteCmsCd=CM0001(접속 일자: 2011년 10월 31일).
  4. 교육인적자원부(2007). 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정: 교육인적자원부 고시 제 2009-79호. http://cutis.mest.go.kr/main.jsp?gCd=S02&siteCmsCd=CM0001(접속 일자: 2011년 10월 31일).
  5. 권재술, 손천택, 이성흠 (2011). 학문적 글쓰기의 이해. 교육과학사.
  6. 김상현(2008). 학술적 의사소통을 위한 과학기술 글쓰기 교육-서울대학교 교육 사례를 중심으로-. 공학기술, 제15권 제4호, 31-33.
  7. 김상현(2009). <과학과 기술 글쓰기> 강좌의 운영 - 현황 및 교육 중점 사항을 중심으로 -. 한국사고와 표현학회 학술대회 논문집, No. 9.
  8. 김재호(2008). '공학인증제'와 교양교육 - 서울대학교'과학과 기술 글쓰기'교과내용 개선의 필요성을 중심으로 -. 철학사상, vol. 28, 54-71.
  9. 김종록, 이관희(2011). 과학글쓰기 전략: 이공계열 학생들을 위한 글쓰기. 박이정.
  10. 남정희.곽경화.장경화.Hand(2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 제 28권 제8호, 922-936.
  11. 박권수(2006). 이공계 과학글쓰기 교육을 위한 강의 모형-연세대학교의 과학글쓰기를 중심으로. 한국작문학회 연구발표회 자료집, 31-41.
  12. 박승희(2008). 실용적 의사소통을 위한 과학기술 글쓰기 교육-영남대학교 교육 사례를 중심으로-. 공학기술, 제15권 제4호, 34-36.
  13. 생각 2.0(2009). 논리와 비판적 사고. 도서출판글고운.
  14. 서울대학교 기초교육원(2005). 과학과 기술의 글쓰기 교과목 개발: 2005년도 서울대학교 정책연구과제 보고서. 저자.
  15. 서정수, 신동수, 권성규, 노승백, 이병수, 임문혁, 주홍택(2008). 과학기술문 작성법: 글쓰기의 기본이론과 실제. 두양사.
  16. 손정우(2006). 과학논술능력 향상을 위한 과학적 사고력에 근거한 과학 글쓰기 교수법. 교육과정평가연구, 9(2), 333-355.
  17. 신선경(2008a). 과학 탐구와 과학 글쓰기에 대한 텍스트언어학적 접근. 텍스트언어학 24, 75-99.
  18. 신선경(2008b). 과학기술자를 위한 글쓰기 교육의 새로운 방향. 작문연구, vol. 7, 35-58.
  19. 신형기.정희모.김성수.이재성.유현재.김현주.한경희.박권수.박진영(2008). 모든 사람을 위한 과학 글쓰기: 정확하게 명확하게 간결하게. 사이언스북스.
  20. 이경우(2005). 과학과 기술 글쓰기 교과목 개발: 2005년도 서울대학교 정책연구과제 보고서. 서울대학교 기초교육원.
  21. 이상헌(2007). 효과적인 과학 글쓰기 교과 구성을 위한 모색-카톨릭대학교 사례를 중심으로-. 한국사고와표현학회 학술대회 논문집. 37-48.
  22. 이재승(2009). 글쓰기 교육의 원리와 방법-과정 중심 접근- 교육과학사.
  23. 정희모, 김성수, 이재성(옮김)(2008). 비판적 사고와 과학 글쓰기. 연세대학교 출판부.
  24. 조성민(2009). 논리와 토론∙논술. 교육과학사.
  25. 한상철(2004a). 비판적 사고와 글쓰기 -구성주의적 글쓰기 이론을 중심으로-. 철학사상 별책 제4권, 131-196. 서울대학교 철학사상연구소.
  26. 한상철(2004b). 비판적 사고와 토론 -아카데미식 토론을 중심으로-. 철학사상 별책 제4권, 131-196. 서울대학교 철학사상연구소.
  27. Applebee, A. N.(1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 597-654. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054004597
  28. Beall, H.(1998). Expanding the scope of writing in chemical education. Journal of Science and Technology, 7(3), 259-270.
  29. Choi, A., Notebaert, A., Diaz, J., & Hand, B.(2010). Examining arguments generated by year 5, 7, and 10 students in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 40, 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9105-x
  30. Cottrell, S.(2005). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Fulwiler, B. R.(2007). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  32. Gowin, D. B.(1981). Educating. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.
  33. Graham, S.(2006). Writing. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne. Handbook of educational psychology, second ed.
  34. Greene, L.(2010). Writing in the life sciences: A critical thinking approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  35. Gunel, M., Hand, B., & McDermott, M.(2009). Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students' conceptual understanding of biology. Learning and Instruction, 19, 354-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.07.001
  36. Hamilton, G.(2002). Content-area writing strategies: Science. Portland, Maine: J. Weston Walch.
  37. Hand, B. & Keys, C. W.(1999). Inquiry investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27-29.
  38. Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J. & Bintz, J.(2009). Negotiating science: The critical role of argument in student inquiry, grades 5-10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  39. Hand, B. & Prain, V.(2002). Teachers implementing writing-to-learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study. Science Education, 86, 737-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10016
  40. Hand, B. & Yang(2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070252
  41. Hassard, J. & Dias, M.(2009). The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle and high school, second ed. New York: Routledge.
  42. Herr, N.(2008). The sourcebook for teaching science: Strategies, activities, and instructional resources. San Franisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  43. Hibbard, K. M.(2000). Performance-based learning and assessment in middle school science. Larchmont, NT: Ey on Education.
  44. Hohenshell, L. M. & Hand, B.(2006). Writing-to-learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336965
  45. Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E.(1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 877-893. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310905
  46. Kellough, R. D. & Carjuzaa, J.(2009). Teaching in the middle and secondary schools, ninth ed. Boston: Pearson.
  47. Keys, C. W.(1999a). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  48. Keys, C. W.(1999b). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students' written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1044-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199911)36:9<1044::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  49. Keys, C. W.(2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<676::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-6
  50. Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S.(1999). Using the science writing heuristics as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  51. Klein, P. D.(1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), 203-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021913217147
  52. Knisely, K.(2005). A student handbook for writing in biology, second edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
  53. Krajcik, J. & Czerniak, C.(2007). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A projected approach, third ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  54. Lester, J. D. & Lester, Jr. J. D.(2006). Writing research papers in the social sciences. New York: Pearson.
  55. Levin, T. & Wagner, T.(2006). In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom. Instructional Science, 34, 227-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-6929-x
  56. Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P.(2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman(eds.) Handbook of research on science education. Mahwash, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Publishers.
  57. Mason, L. & Boscolo, P.(2000). Writing and conceptual change. what changes? Instructional Science, 28, 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003854216687
  58. Nam, J., Choi, A., & Hand, B.(2010). Implementation of the science writing heuristic(SWH) approach in 8th grade science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Published online on 15 October 2010.
  59. National Research Council(NRC)(1996). National science education standard. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  60. Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K.(2008). Questions, claims, and evidence: The important place of argument in children's science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  61. Penrose, A. M. & Katz, S. B.(2010). Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse, third ed. New York: Longman.
  62. Pizzini, E. L., Shepardson, D. P., & Abell, S. K.(1989). A rational for and the development of a problem solving model of instruction in science education. Science Education, 73, 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730730502
  63. Prain, V. & Hand, B.(1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(6), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00003-0
  64. Redman, P.(2005). Good Essay writing: A social sciences guide. London: SAGE publications.
  65. Rijaarsdam, G., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Kieft, M.(2006). Writing experiment manuals in science education: The impact of writing, genre, and audience. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 203-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336932
  66. Rivard, L. P. 1994. A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310910
  67. Rivard, L. P. & Straw, S. B.(2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U
  68. Sampson, V. & Grooms, J. and Walker, J.(2009). Argument-driven inquiry: A way to promote learning during laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 76(8), 42-47.
  69. Schwab, J. J.(1965). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford and L. Pugno(eds.) The structure of knowledge and the Curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  70. Wallace, C. S., Hand, B. H., & Prain, V.(2007). Writing and learning in the science classroom. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  71. Yore, L. D., Florence, M. K., Pearson, T. W., & Weaver, A. J.(2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336601

Cited by

  1. An Comparison Analysis of Science Writing Tasks in the Chemistry Domain of Middle School Science Textbooks Developed under the 2007 & the 2009 Revised National Curriculums (RNC) vol.58, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.600