Changes in Near Lateral Phoria and Near Point of Convergence After Viewing Smartphones

스마트폰 시청 후 나타난 근거리 사위 및 폭주근점의 변화

  • Park, Kyung-Joo (Dept. of Optometry, Sunlin College University) ;
  • Lee, Wook-Jin (Dept. of Optometry, Sunlin College University) ;
  • Lee, Na-Geum (Dept. of Optometry, Sunlin College University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Young (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Son, Jeong-Sik (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Kyungwoon University) ;
  • Yu, Dong-Sik (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Kyungwoon University)
  • 박경주 (선린대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 이욱진 (선린대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 이나금 (선린대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 이정영 (대구보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 손정식 (경운대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 유동식 (경운대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.02
  • Accepted : 2012.06.16
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to compare changes in near lateral phoria and near point of convergence after viewing smartphones and monitors during short periods. Methods: 50 subjects with healthy eyes from 20s to 30s (mean age, $21.84{\pm}5.13$ years) were examined. Viewing time was set at 5 min to 20 min, and recovery time was 10 min. Near lateral phoria and near point of convergence (NPC) were examined before and after watching smartphones and monitors, and subjectively symptoms for visual fatigue were surveyed using a questionnaire before and after viewing image. Results: The tendency of phoria in viewing smartpones found more exophoric results than in viewing monitors, and both exophoric shifts were recovered after 10 min. The receded NPC in the smartphones was more remote than in the monitors. The smartpones induced more visual fatigue than the monitors. Conclusions: Sustained smartphone works induced changes in phoria and NPC, and this type of stress could cause visual fatigue. Therefore, an appropriate rest breaks can be helpful in relieving visual fatigue.

Keywords

Monitor;Smartphone;Phoria;Near point of convergence

References

  1. Kim JH, Ryu KH, Kim IS. The study on relation between asthenopia of lateral phoria and fusional reserve. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2006;11(4):329-335.
  2. Kim HD, Lee DH. A study on the distance and near horizontal phoria of the young people in Korea. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2004;9(2):251-255.
  3. Choi KS. Research about students' horizontal heterophoria in near distance with Maddox Rod. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(3):59-63.
  4. Kang HY, Park CH. Development and validation of smartphone addiction scale. Korean Psychological Association. 2011;205.
  5. Lim SE, Park HK. On a comparison between smartphone and feature phone users in mobile phone addiction and the third person effect. Korean Psychological Association. 2011; 256.
  6. Oh JE, Kim KO. Contemporary consumers' product consumption experiences: a comparison between the two leading brands of smart phone. J Korean Home Economics Association. 2012;50(1):141-154. https://doi.org/10.6115/khea.2012.50.1.141
  7. Korea communications commission. Statistical data: wired and wireless communication device production value in Korea, 2012. http://www.kcc.go.kr (March 2012).
  8. Korea communications commission. Survey reveals changing patterns of smartphone use in Korea, 2011. http://www.kcc.go.kr(21 July 2011).
  9. International Scientific Conference on Work with Display Units, Berlinguet L, Berthelette D. Work with display units 89, 1st Ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990;21-27.
  10. International Scientific Conference on Work With Display Units, Knave B, Widebck PG. Work with display units 86, 1st Ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1987;249-262.
  11. Bergqvist UO, Knave BG. Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(1):27-33. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1432
  12. Franzn O, Lennerstrand G, Richter H. Brain potential correlates of supraliminal contrast functions and defocus. Int Journal Human Computer Interaction. 1994;6(2):155-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319409526088
  13. Best PS, Littleton MH, Gramopadhye AK, Tyrrell RA. Relations between individual differences in oculomotor resting states and visual inspection performance. Ergonomics. 1996;39(1):35-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964431
  14. Butzon SP, Eagels SR. Prescribing for the moderate-toadvanced ametropic presbyopic VDT user. A comparison of the technical progressive and Datalite CRT trifocal. J Am Optom Assoc. 1997;68(8):495-502.
  15. Campbell FW, Durden K. The visual display terminal issue: a consideration of its physiological, psychological and clinical background. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1983;3(2):175-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1983.tb00596.x
  16. Gratton I, Piccoli B, Zaniboni A, Meroni M, Grieco A. Change in visual function and viewing distance during work with VDTs. Ergonomics. 1990;33(12):1433-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925344
  17. Lee MY, Lee CW. Relationship between the use of mobile phones and hearing thresholds in some white-collar workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2002;14(1):47-56.
  18. Kim JS, Ryu CY, Kim SC, Oh HT, Yuk JR, Kim DW. The effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phone on cognitive function in human. The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science. 2003;14(6):606-615.
  19. Franzn O, Lennerstrand G, Richter H. Brain potential correlates of supraliminal contrast functions and defocus. Int Journal Human Computer Interaction. 1994;6(2):155-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319409526088
  20. Choi SM. A study about N.P.C, heterophoria and near convergence and divergence by amount of the refractive errors. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(4):53-57.