Effects of Risk Perception on Risk Attitude and Risk Acceptance of Nuclear Power Plants

원전주변 지역주민의 위험지각이 위험태도와 위험수용에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2012.04.09
  • Accepted : 2012.05.08
  • Published : 2012.06.28


This research examined the effect of risk perception on risk attitude and risk acceptance of nuclear power plants. For this study, we carried out a survey targeting local residents living in Gyeong-ju..And we examined how risk perception of nuclear power plants have influences the risk attitude and risk acceptance including distrust on government's polices and perceived benefit. First, The findings showed that risk perception of nuclear power plants influenced positively on risk attitude. Second, risk attitude of nuclear power plants influenced negatively on risk acceptance. Third, distrust on government's polices influenced negatively on risk acceptance. Fourth, perceived benefit influenced positively on risk acceptance.


Risk Acceptance;Risk Perception;Perceived Benefit


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. 한겨레(2011.03.13.), 후쿠시마 후폭풍. 각국 '원전 확대 정책' 흔들, html
  2. 한동섭, 김형일, "위험과 커뮤니케이션: 원자력의 사회적 수용에 미치는 커뮤니케이션의 효과", 한국위기관리논집, 제7권, 제2호, pp.1-22, 2011.
  3. P. Slovic, "The perception of risk," Science, Vol.236, pp.280-285, 1987.
  4. 이영애, 이나경, "위험지각의 심리적 차원", 인지과학, 제16권, 제3호, pp.199-211, 2005.
  5. K. Witte, "Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model," Communication Monographs, Vol.61, pp.113-134, 1994.
  6. R. N. Rimal and K. Real, "Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude framework to understand health behaviors," Human Communication Research, Vol.29, pp.370-399, 2003.
  7. S. Kaplan and B. J. Garrick, "On the quantitative definition of risk," Risk Analysis, 제1권, pp.11-27, 1981.
  8. D. Paton, L. Smith, and D. Johnston, "When good intentions turns bad: Promoting natural hazard preparedness," Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol.20, pp.25-30, 2005.
  9. C. R. Sunstein, "Terrorism and probability neglect," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol.26, pp.121-136, 2003.
  10. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, "Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety," Acta Psychologia, Vol.56, pp.183-203, 1984.
  11. 이영애, "위험지각 연구의 최근 동향", 한국심리학회지: 실험, 제17권, 제3호, pp.265-277, 2005.
  12. 서보윤, 디지털사회의 위험 커뮤니케이션에 관한 연구, 중앙대학교대학원, 박사학위논문, 2006.
  13. N. D. Weinstein, "Optimistic biases about personal risks," In R. Lofstedt and L. Frewer (eds.), Risk and Modern Society, London, Earthscan Publications, pp.239-241, 1998.
  14. P. Bennett, "Understanding responses to risk: Some basic findings," In P. Bennett and K. Calman (eds.), Risk communication and public health, New York, Oxford University Press, pp.3-19, 1999.
  15. T. Sanders, R. Campbell, J. Donovan, and D. Sharp, "Narrative accounts of hereditary risk: Knowledge about family history, Lay Theories of disease, and 'Internal' and 'External' causation," Qualitative Health Research, Vol.17, pp.510-520, 2007,
  16. W. C. Adams, "The role of media relations in risk communication," Public Relations Quarterly, Vol.37, pp.28-32, 1992-1993.
  17. P. Slovic, "Informing and educating the public about risk," Risk Analysis, Vol.6, pp.403-415, 1986.
  18. 정은경, 김봄메, 손영우, "조절초점이 위험감수에 미치는 영향: 지각된 이득의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 제25권, 제2호, pp.209-221, 2011.
  19. E. Crowe and E. T. Higgins, "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.69, pp.117-132, 1997.
  20. E. Katz, K. Fromme, and E. D'Amico, "Effects of outcome expectancies and personality on young adults' illicit drug use, heavy drinking, and risky sexual behavior," Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol.24, pp.1-22, 2000.
  21. A. A. Scholer, X. Zou, K. Fujita, S. J. Stroessner, and E. T. Higgins, "When risk-seeking becomes amotivational necessity," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.99, pp.215-231, 2010.
  22. S. B. Thomas, "Health disparities: The importance of culture and health communication," American Journal of Public Health, Vol.94, p.2050, 2004.
  23. 소영진, "원자력 기술의 사회적 수용성에 대한 영향요인분석", 국민의 원자력 수용성 증진을 위한 워크샵 발표논문집, 한국행정연구원, 2000.
  24. M. S. Yim and P. A. Vaganov, "Effects of education on nuclear risk perception and attitude: Theory," Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol.42, pp.221-235, 2003.
  25. 송해룡, 김원제, 정세일, "과학기술 위험에 대한인지 및 태도: 전자파 위험을 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제10권, 제5호, pp.436-445, 2010.
  26. L. Sjöberg and B. M. Drottz-Sjöberg, "Moral value, risk and risk tolerance," Risk Research Report, Vol.11, Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics, 1993.
  27. M. Viklund, "Energy policy options-from the perspective of public attitude and risk perceptions," Energy Policy, Vol.32, pp.1159-1171, 2004.
  28. Y. J. Cha, "Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan & the United States," Journal of Risk Research, Vol.3, pp.321-332, 2000.
  29. P. Slovic, J. Flynn, and M. Layman, "Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste," Science, Vol.254, pp.1603-1607, 1991.
  30. 이은지, 원자력시설에 관한 지역주민 인식 분석, 고려대학교대학원 석사학위논문, 2005.
  31. I. Komiya, H. Torri, Y. Fujii, and N. Hayashizaki, "Relationship between students' interests in science and attitude toward nuclear power generation," Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol.50, pp.719-727, 2008.
  32. J. Flynn, W. Burns, C. K. Mertz, and P. Slovic, "Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of s structural model," Risk Analysis, Vol.12, pp.417-429, 1992.
  33. 이나경, 이영애, "방폐장 입지에 관한 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 변수", 한국심리학회지: 실험, 제17권, 제4호, pp.461-475, 2005.
  34. 이현주, 이영애, "원자력 발전소와 방폐장 낙인의 심리적 모형: 신뢰와 감정, 지식을 중심으로," 한국심리학회지: 일반, 제30권, 제3호, pp.831-851, 2005.
  35. 심준섭, "원자력 발전소에 대한 신뢰, 인식된 위험과 혜택, 그리고 수용성", 한국정책학회보, 제18권, 제4호, pp.93-122, 2009.
  36. 안형기, "과학기술적 위험의 사회적 특성분석", 정책분석평가학회보, 제20권, 제4호, pp.57-86, 2010.
  37. 송해룡, "과학기술 위험보도에 관한 수용자 인식 연구: GMO 사례를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 제49권, 제3호, pp.105-128, 2005.

Cited by

  1. Local Residents' Perception Analysis of Nuclear Power after the Thyroid Cancer Damage Lawsuit Adjacent to the Nuclear Plant vol.10, pp.8, 2016,