DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Two model comparisons of software reliability analysis for Burr type XII distribution

  • An, Jeong-Hyang (Department of Internet Information, Daegu Haany University)
  • Received : 2012.06.14
  • Accepted : 2012.07.14
  • Published : 2012.07.31

Abstract

In this paper reliability growth model in which the operating time between successive failure is a continuous random variable is proposed. This model is for Burr type XII distribution with two parameters which is discussed in two versions: the order statistics and non-homogeneous Poisson process. The two software reliability measures are obtained. The performance for two versions of the suggested model is tested on real data set by U-plot and Y-plot using Kolmogorov distance.

References

  1. Abdel-Ghaly, A. A. (1996). A new model for software and hardware faults's removel process. Economic and Business Review, Faculty of Commerce, Ain-shams University, 1, 23-47 .
  2. Abdel-Ghaly, A. A., Al-Dayian, G. R. and Al-Kashkari, F. H. (1997). The use of Burr type XII distribution on software modelling. Microelectro Reliability, 37, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(95)00124-7
  3. Abdel-Ghaly, A. A. and Attiah, A. F. (1990). A Bayesian analysis of theWeibull model of software reliability. Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference Institute of Statistical Studies and Research, 25, 15-34.
  4. Abdel-Ghaly, A. A., Chan, P. Y. and Littlewood, B. (1986). Evaluation of computing software reliability predictions. IEEE Transaction Software Engineering, 12, 950-967. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1986.6313050
  5. Brocklehurst, S. and Littlewood, B. (1992). New ways to get accurate reliability measures. IEEE Software, 9, 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.143100
  6. Goel, A. L. (1980). Software error detecting model with applications. Journal of System Software, 1, 243- 249.
  7. Goal, A. L., and Okumoto, K. (1979). Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measure. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 28, 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1979.5220566
  8. Jelinski, K. and Moranda, P. (1972). Software reliability research. In Statistical Computer Performance Evaluation, edited by W. Freiberger, Academic Press, London, 465-484.
  9. Karanta, I. (2006). Methods and problems of software reliability estimation, VTT working papers 63, VTT Technical Research Center of Finland.
  10. Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 2nd edition, John Wily and Sons, New York.
  11. Lee, J. and Lee, C. (2010). Reliability and ratio in aright truncated Rayleigh distribution. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21, 195-200.
  12. Lee, J. and Yoon, S. C. (2008). Software reliability for order statistic of Burr XII Distribution. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 1361-1369.
  13. Littlewood, B. (1981). Stochastic reliability growth: A model for fault removal in computer programs and hardware design. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 30, 13-320.
  14. Miller, D. R. (1984). Exponential order statistics models of software reliability growth, Technical Report T-496184, George Washington University, Washington, U.S.A..
  15. Moon, Y. and Lee, C. (2011). Estimating reliability in discrete distributions. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 22, 811-817.
  16. Nalini, R., Zhaohui, L., and Bonnie, K. R. (2008). NHPP models with Markov switching for software reliability. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 3988-3999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.01.010
  17. Pham, H. (2000). Software reliability, New York, Berlin.
  18. Park, J. Y., Park, J. H. and Fujiwara, T. (2006). Frameworks for NHPP software reliability growth models. International Journal of Reliability and Applications, 7, 155-166.
  19. Rahman, M. and Muraduzzaman, S. M. (2010). Likelihood ratio in estimating gamma distribution param- eters. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21, 345-354.
  20. Singpurwalla, N. and Wilson, S. (1999). Statistical methods in software engineering : Reliability and risk, Springer, New York.