DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Measurement Scale for School Police's Job Performance

학교보안관의 직무수행 척도 개발

  • 김경식 (호서대학교 스포츠과학부 사회체육전공/기초과학연구소) ;
  • 김은정 (경기대학교 경호보안학과)
  • Received : 2012.04.18
  • Accepted : 2012.06.11
  • Published : 2012.07.28

Abstract

This study is aimed at developing a tool to measuring school police's job performance, and verifying its credibility and validity. This study collected the sample to 250 subjects using a significance collection method to parents of elementary schools school police work. But excluding dishonestly responding data, this used total 210 people for the final analysis. This study executed experts' meeting, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and item analysis to verify reliability, and verification of internal consistency and reliability. This study extracted and confirmed 7 factors for specialization, attitude, program, prevention activity of school violence, effect, basic duty, teaching for school time and home time, and correlation with related people. Through the above research approach and procedure, this study arrived at the following conclusion. First, validity to school police's job performance and measurement tool to job performance is very high. That is, school police's job performance was explored and confirmed through correlation with specialization, attitude, program, prevention activity of school violence, effect, basic job, teaching for school time and home time, and related people, and of them, explanation of attitude is the highest. Second, reliability to the measurement scale for school police's job performance is very high. That is, school police's job performance has high correlation between items, sub-factors, and total scores, and reliability of internal consistency, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ value, is over .708. Putting them together, measurement scale for school police's job performance is a questionnaire sheet with very high level of validity and reliability.

Keywords

School Police;Job Performance;Validity;Reliability

References

  1. 국민신문, 서울시, 4차 심사 통해 학교보안관 1,094명 채용, 2. 22, http://www.gmsm.kr/news/view, 2011.
  2. 김경식, 스포츠과학 연구방법론, 서울: 무지개출판사, 2010.
  3. 김경식, 권민혁, "정책투자우선순위 도출을 위한 사회체육활동 참가제약 척도 개발과 적용", 한국스포츠 학회지, 제20권, 제2호, pp.159-173, 2007.
  4. 김영한, "학교안전을 위한 국가적 노력과 과제", 한국청소년정책, 2010.
  5. 김은정, "학교보안관 제도의 개선 방안", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제11권, 제12호, pp.774-784, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.12.774
  6. 김종복, "안전사고 예방교육에 대한 공업고등학교 학생들의 인식 연구", 대한안전경영과학회 학술대회논문집, pp.41-47, 2007.
  7. 네이버지식사전, http://krdic.naver.com/ 2012.
  8. 박유진, 학교폭력 예방 프로그램 구안, 부산교육 대학원 교육대학원, 석사학위논문, 2008.
  9. 서울특별시청, "안심하고 학교가요! 학교보안관 제도", 3. 15, http://gov.seoul.go.kr, 2012.
  10. 시민일보, 학부모 10명중 9명 "학교보안관 제도 만족", 5. 30, 2011.
  11. 이상훈, "서울시 학교보안관 제도의 평가와 발전적 확대방안", 한국경호경비학회지, 제29호, pp.163-191, 2011.
  12. 이영우, 송수복, "학교 내의 보안관제도에 관한 법적 고찰", 한국정책학회 춘계학술대회. pp.159-176, 2011.
  13. 서울특별시 교육협력국, www.edu.seoul.go.kr/l,2011.
  14. J. S. Kakalik and S. Wildhom, Private police in the United States, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Washington: US Department of Justice, 1972.
  15. E. J. Kim, Development of School Service Quality Parameter, International Conference on Convergence Content, Vol.9, No.2, 2011.
  16. J. B. Arthur and P. L. Peter, Private security, Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing co. p.7, 1977.
  17. T. M. Scott and M. McPherson, The Development of the Private Sector of the Criminal Justice System, 6 Law and Society Review, pp.267-288, 1971. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052856
  18. V. H. Vroom, Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
  19. L. W. Porter and E. E. Lawler, Managerial Attitude and Performance, Homewood: Irwin, 1968.