# Corrosion Inhibition of Copper-nickel Alloy: Experimental and Theoretical Studies

• Khadom, Anees A. (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Daiyla) ;
• Yaro, Aprael S. (Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad) ;
• Musa, Ahmed Y. (Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia) ;
• Mohamad, Abu Bakar (Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia) ;
• Kadhum, Abdul Amir H. (Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia)
• Received : 2011.11.23
• Accepted : 2012.06.14
• Published : 2012.08.20
• 122 29

#### Abstract

The corrosion inhibition of copper-nickel alloy by Ethylenediamine (EDA) and Diethylenetriamine (DETA) in 1.5M HCl has been investigated by weight loss technique at different temperatures. Maximum value of inhibitor efficiency was 75% at $35^{\circ}C$ and 0.2 M inhibitor concentration EDA, while the lower value was 4% at $35^{\circ}C$ and 0.01 M inhibitor concentration DETA. Two mathematical models were used to represent the corrosion rate data, second order polynomial model and exponential model respectively. Nonlinear regression analysis showed that the first model was better than the second model with high correlation coefficient. The reactivity of studied inhibitors was analyzed through theoretical calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). The results showed that the reactive sites were located on the nitrogen (N1, N2 and N4) atoms.

#### Keywords

Alloy;Corrosion test;Molecular dynamic;Corrosion

# INTRODUCTION

Acid solutions are often used in industry for cleaning and pickling of metallic structures, processes which are normally accompanied by considerable dissolution of the metal. A useful method to protect metals and alloys in aggressive environments against corrosion is by adding organic or inorganic species to the solution in contact with the surface in order to inhibit the corrosion reaction and hence reduce the corrosion rate. The inhibition effectiveness might be due to the formation of thin layers of metal inhibitor complexes as Trabanelli and his co-workers reported.1 Generally, the diminution of the corrosion rate is a result of adsorption which makes, in acidic media, an effective blocking of the active sites of metal dissolution and/or hydrogen evolution. The adsorption requires the existence of attractive forces between the adsorbate and the metal. The principal types of interaction between an organic inhibitor and metal surface are physisorption, chemisorption or both of them. The adsorption of inhibitor is influenced by the nature and surface charge of the metal, the type of aggressive electrolyte, and temperature and the chemical structure of the inhibitor. Indeed, specific interaction between functional groups and the metal surface and heteroatoms like nitrogen, oxygen, sulphur and phosphorus plays an important role in the inhibition process due to the free electron pairs they possess.2 Several amines3-5 exhibit good inhibitory effect in hydrochloric acid. The present study was undertaken to investigate the copper-nickel alloy corrosion inhibition in 1.5 M hydrochloric acid by Ethylenediamine (EDA) and Diethylenetriamine (DETA). The study was conducted by weight loss method. The thermodynamic parameters of molecule adsorption onto metal surface were determined and the nature of inhibitor adsorption process was also studied and discussed. The molecular structures of the two inhibitors are showed below.

# EXPERIMENTAL WORK

The corrosion behavior of copper-nickel alloy, which is used widely in many industrial equipments, was studied using weight loss method in the absence and presence of Ethylenediamine (EDA) and Diethylenetriamine (DETA) in 1.5MHCl solution at different temperatures (35, 45, 55 and 65 ℃), and different inhibitor concentrations (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 M). Ring shape specimen of Cu-Ni alloy with dimension (2.22 cm) outside diameter, (1.5 cm) width, and (0.13 cm) thickness, exposing a surface area of about (10 cm2) to corrosive media. Specimens were washed by detergent and flushed by tap water followed by distilled water, degreased by analar benzene and acetone, then annealed in vacuums to 600 ℃ for one hour and cooled under vacuum to room temperature. Before each run, specimens of Cu-Ni were abraded in sequence using emery paper of grade number 220, 320, 400, and 600 then washed by running tap water followed by distilled water then dried by clean tissue, degreased with benzene, dried, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally left in desicater over silica gel. Weighing the specimen was carried out using 4 decimals digital balance and its dimensions were measured with vernier. The metal samples for weight loss runs were completely immersed in 250 cm3 solution of corrodant contained in a conical flask. They were exposed for a period of three days at a desired temperature, acid concentration, and inhibitor concentration. Weight losses were determined in the absence and presence of inhibitors. The data are expressed as mass loss per unit time and per unit area; in the present work the units of corrosion rate were g/m2.day (gmd). The chemical compositions of Cu-Ni alloy were (0.148%Sn, 0.2%Fe, 0.134%Zn, 0.015%Al, 0.0003%P, 0.5%Sb, 0.0583%Pb, 0.0202%Si, 0.017%S, 0.0056%As, 10%Ni, and the remainder is Cu).

# THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS

The equilibrium geometries of the EDA and DETA molecules were optimized using energy minimization method implemented in DMol3 model in Material studio v.5.5, a high quality quantum mechanics computer program (available from Accelrys, San Diego, CA). These calculations employed an ab initio, local density functional (LDF) method with a double numericpolarization (DNP) basis set and a Becke–Perdew (BP).6,7 The chemical reactivity of the different sites of the molecule was evaluated by Fukui indices, which are defined by5

fornucleophilic attack, and

for electrophilic attack, where qk(N), qk(N–1), and qk(N+1) denote electronic populations of the atom k in neutral, cationic, and anionic systems, respectively. These quantities were calculated using Mulliken Population Analysis.

# RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

## Activation Parameters

The corrosion rates of Cu-Ni alloy in 1.5 M HCl acid solution as a function of temperature in absence and presence of different inhibitors concentrations are summarized in Table 1 through 36 runs using weight loss technique. The following equations were used to calculate the weight loss corrosion rate and inhibitor efficiency respectively:

Table 1.Effect of temperature and inhibitor concentration on the corrosion of Cu-Ni alloy in 1.5 M HCl acid solution

Where CRuninhibit and CRinhibit, are the corrosion rates in absence and presence of inhibitors, respectively. Thermodynamic parameters of the corrosion reaction, namely activation energy Eact, entropy ΔSact and enthalpy ΔHact of activation were calculated using Arrhenius equation (Eq. 5) and its alternative formulation called transition state equation (Eq. 6). From the corrosion rate data at different temperatures in absence and presence of Ethylenediamine (EDA) and Diethylenetriamine (DETA) as corrosion inhibitors, Arrhenius and transition state plots were obtained. Activation energies were calculated from the Arrhenius plots, which represent the relationship between log (CR) and the reciprocal of absolute temperature:8

While the transition state equation can be defined as:

Where A is the frequency factor, T is the absolute temperature, R is the universal gas constant, h is Plank’s constant, and N is Avogadro’s number. The values of entropy of activation ΔSact and of the enthalpy ΔHact of activation were obtained by drawing of Eq. 6 as log (CR/T) vs (1/T). Figs. 1 and 2 show Arrhenius and transition state plots for EDA at different conditions, similar plots were obtained for DETA but do not appear in this paper. The values of activation parameters were listed in Table 2. In case of EDA the values of Eact and ΔHact were higher as compared with uninhibited acid. This means that the corrosion reaction in presence of the inhibitor needs more energy to occur. While in the case of DETA the activation energy Eact and activation enthalpy ΔHact for an uninhibited acid were higher than in inhibited acid. The decrease in the value of activation energy appears to be paradoxical. However, Khadom and Yaro9 attributed this to increased coverage of the metal surface by the inhibitor at higher temperatures and also suggested that the rate of formation of the chemisorbed passive film may be greater than its rate of dissolution at higher temperatures. El-Anadouli et al.10 obtained values of activation energy for the corrosion of metal in acidic media in absence and presence of some inhibitors. They found that some inhibitors in the corrosive medium modify the kinetics of corrosion reaction by offering alternate reaction paths with lower activation energies. The value of Eact for copper-nickel alloy corrosion in uninhibited hydrochloric acid solution (21.71 kJ.mol-1) is in the same order of magnitude of some literature data for copper alloy in some acid solutions.11,12 Table 2, shows that all the values of A are lower than that of the blank, which is an advantage for inhibiting the corrosion rate of metals. It is well known that the increase in A elevates the corrosion rate of metal.12 As observed above, for all cases Eact>ΔHact by a value which approximately equal to RT. From the thermodynamic and kinetic point of view, the unimolecular reactions are characterized by following the equation13

The value of ΔSact is negative in absence of inhibitors. In absence of inhibitors the Transition State of the rate-determining recombination step represents a more orderly arrangement relative to the initial state, and hence, a negative value for ΔSact is obtained. It is still negative in presence of inhibitors but its magnitude decreases with increasing concentrations of inhibitors. This was because these compounds inhibited acid dissolution of metal by simple blocking on the surface without changing the mechanism of corrosion process.14 According to Khadom et al.14 the corrosion of metals in neutral or acidic solution is cathodically controlled by the hydrogen evolution reaction which occurs in two steps,

The rate-determining step for the hydrogen evolution reaction is the recombination of adsorbed hydrogen atoms to form hydrogen molecules (Eq. 8). In free acid solution the transition state of the rate determining recombination step represents a more orderly arrangement relative to initial state and hence a negative value for the entropy of activation is obtained. In presence of inhibitors, the entropy of activation still has a negative value but its magnitude decreases with increase of the inhibitor concentration in the case of EDA. In the presence of this compound, the recombination of adsorbed hydrogen atoms to form hydrogen molecules is hindered. In the case of DETA, the values of ΔSact are higher. So, this may be due to the new path of reaction, which reduced the values of Eact and ΔHact, respectively. At the same time this path may have a more random recombination step.

Fig. 1.Arrhenius Plot of Cu-Ni Alloy in 1.5 M HCl Containing Various Concentration of EDA.

Fig. 2.Transition state Plot of Cu-Ni Alloy in 1.5 M HCl Containing Various Concentration of EDA.

Table 2.Activation parameters for Cu-Ni alloy corrosion reaction in inhibited HCl

Surface coverage (Θ) data are very useful while considering inhibitor adsorption characteristics. The primary step in inhibitor action in the acid solution generally is agreed to be its adsorption on the metal surface. This involves the assumption that corrosion reactions are prevented from occurring over the area (or at active sites) on a metal surface that is covered by adsorbed inhibitor species, whereas these corrosion reactions normally occurred on inhibitor-free areas.15 Accordingly, the fraction of surface covered with inhibitor species (θ = IE%/100) can follow as a function of inhibitor concentration and solution temperature. When the fraction of surface covered is determined as a function of the concentration at constant temperature, adsorption isotherm could be evaluated at equilibrium condition. Fraction dependence of surface covered θ on the concentration C of the inhibitor was tested graphically by fitting it to Langmuir’s isotherm, which assumes that the solid surface contains a fixed number of adsorption sites and each site holds one adsorbed species. Eq. 10 and Fig. 3 show linear plots when drawn as C/θ versus C, suggesting that adsorption is in line with Langmuir’s isotherm:

Fig. 3.Langmuir adsorption isotherm of EDA on metal surface.

Table 3.Adsorption parameters for corrosion inhibition of Cu - Ni alloy in 1.5 M HCl

Where C is inhibitor concentration, KLangmuir adsorptive equilibrium constant representing the degree of adsorption (i.e., the higher value of KLangmuir indicates that the inhibitor is strongly adsorbed on the metal surface). As shown in Table 3, the value of KLangmuir was obtained from the reciprocal of intercept of Langmuir plot line, and the correlation coefficients, R, of this line is near unity means that each inhibitor molecule occupies one active site on metal surface. It is a known fact that KLangmuir denotes the strength between adsorbate and adsorbent. Large values of KLangmuir imply more efficient adsorption and consequently better inhibition efficiency.16 It is clear from Table 3 that values of KLangmuir are low, indicating weak interaction between inhibitors and metal surface. It seems, therefore, that electrostatic interaction (physisorption) among inhibitor molecules existing as cations should prevail over molecular interaction, and this often results in strong interactions (chemisorption).17 The equilibrium constant of adsorption KLangmuir is related to the standard adsorption free energy (ΔGoads) by the following equation:18

Where K' is a constant, and y is the number of inhibitor molecules occupying one active site. A plot of ln(θ/1-θ) vs. lnC gives a straight line of slop y and intercept of ln K' (Fig. 4). Equilibrium constant corresponding to adsorption isotherm is given by, Kkinetic=K' 1/y. Values of y>1 imply the formation of multilayer of inhibitor on the surface of metal. Values of y<1 mean the molecules of a given inhibitor will occupy more than one active site. As shown in Table 3, the kinetic-thermodynamic model data were in a good agreement with that obtained by Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. The value of y was lower than unity indicating the formation of monolayer on the metal surface, and the values of Kkinetic were comparable. Experimental results obtained in this study were further fitted into Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm model (D-RIM). This model was initially used to distinguish between physical and chemical adsorption for removal of some pollutants from aqueous solutions by adsorption on various adsorbents.21 Recently, Noor22 has applied this model in explaining the mechanism of adsorption of corrosion inhibitor onto a metal surface in acidic medium. The equation for the isotherm model can be expressed as:

where θmax is the maximum surface coverage and σ (Polany potential) can be correlated as:

where R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature and C is the concentration of the inhibitor. The constant a gives the mean adsorption energy, E, which is the transfer energy of 1 mol of adsorbate from infinity (bulk solution) to the surface of the adsorbent.

The magnitude of E gives information about the type of adsorption. Values of E less than 8 kJ/mol indicates physical adsorption.22 Fig. 5 shows the relationship between ln θ and σ2 for the corrosion rate data at different temperatures and the corresponding parameters from the regression analysis are listed in Table 4. It is clear from the table that the numerical values of E reflect physical adsorption mechanism. The values of θmax (maximum surface coverage) for the two inhibitors are in good agreement which further corroborates the results obtained for the inhibition efficiency values.

Fig. 4.Kinetic - thermodynamic isotherm for adsorption of DETA on metal surface.

Fig. 5.Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm model for EDA.

Table 4.Adsorption parameters for corrosion inhibition of Cu - Ni alloy in 1.5 M HCl by Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm model

## Effect of Temperature on Inhibitor Efficiency

Table 1 shows the effect of temperature on the performance of the inhibitor. The addition of inhibitors reduces the corrosion rate at different temperatures. In the case of EDA, as shown in Fig. 5 the values of inhibitor efficiency decreased slightly with temperature raise, while in the case of DETA, as shown in Fig. 6, the inhibitor efficiency slightly increased with increasing in temperature, the maximum value was 60% at 0.2 M inhibitor concentration, and 65 ℃ and the minimum value was 4% at 0.01 M inhibitor concentration and 35 ℃.

Fig. 6.Effect of temperature on inhibitor efficiency of EDA.

## Combined Influence of Temperature and Inhibitor Concentration on the Corrosion Rate

The experimental corrosion rate results in uninhibited and inhibited 1.5 M HCl acid as a function of temperature and inhibitor concentration are given in Table 1. Our previous models12 can be suggested again to represent the corrosion rate data. Second order polynomial model was used to represent the temperature and inhibitor concentration effects as follows:

where; Y: Corrosion Rate (gmd), X1: Inhibitor Concentration (M) X2: Absolute Temperature (K) and, a1, a2, a3 a9: are constants. These constants were evaluated by using non-linear estimation regression based on Levenberg-Marquardt method. Eq. 16 used as a first model (M1) to represent the results and yield the following equation for EDA (correlation coefficient R2=0.9988) and DETA (R2=0.9945) respectively:

While, Eq. 17 used as a second model (M2) to represent the results and yield the following equation for EDA (correlation coefficient R2=0.9788) and DETA (R2=0. 9368) respectively:

Figs. 7 and 8 show these models against the experimental corrosion rate data. Also it could be seen the high fitting between experimental and predicted corrosion rates. The best fitting obtained with model M1.

Fig. 7.Effect of temperature on inhibitor efficiency of DETA.

Fig. 8.The deviation of the Two Suggested Models from the Corrosion Rate data of Cu-Ni Alloy in Presence of EDA in 1.5 M HCl.

## Mechanism of Inhibition

The adsorption of inhibitors at metal/solution interfaces can markedly change the corrosion resisting properties of metals.23 The efficiency of organic molecules as good corrosion inhibitors mainly depends on their adsorption ability on the metal surface. So, the investigation of the relation between corrosion inhibition and adsorption is of great importance. The cathodic reaction that occurs on the copper alloy surface in 1.5 M HCl is the oxygen reduction, Since Cu is nobler than H+ in the electromotive series, and a cathodic reaction other than the displacement of H+ must account for metal dissolution. This is readily available in terms of O2 reduction from solution.24 Anodic dissolution of copper in chloride media has been studied extensively. 25-29 The accepted anodic reaction is the dissolution of copper through oxidation of Cu to Cu+:

Then Cu+ reacts with chloride ion from the solution to form CuCl:

Fig. 9.The deviation of the Two Suggested Models from the Corrosion Rate data of Cu-Ni Alloy in Presence of DETA in 1.5 M HCl.

Insoluble CuCl precipitates on the copper surface. The CuCl species has poor adhesion, is unable to produce enough protection for the copper surface, and transforms to the sparingly soluble cuprous chloride complex, CuCl-2 30

It has also been reported that the CuCl-2adsorbed on the surface dissolves by further oxidation:28

It is reported that the anodic dissolution of copper in the acidic chloride solution is controlled by both electro dissolution of copper and diffusion of CuCl-2 to the solution bulk.28,30 The cathodic corrosion reaction in an aerated acidic chloride solution is:

The total corrosion reaction of copper in acidic chloride solutions is as follows:

It is clear from the polarization experiments that the presence of inhibitors decreases the corrosion rate. In acidic solutions, organic inhibitors exists as cationic species R+.31 The protonated amines can be adsorbed on the metal surface on previously adsorbed chloride ions, since organic compounds with heteroatoms of N and S are able to adsorb on the metal surface even at high concentration of chloride ions.32 Fig. 10 shows the three suggested inhibition mechanisms. In model I, at low concentrations, inhibitors cations (R+) from solution cluster around the chloride ions by columbic attraction on the metal surface where chloride ions are already adsorbed, then as a result tend to be weakly bound to the chloride ions, resulting in low coverage of the electrode surface. Model II represents a situation of weak adsorption of chloride ions; R+ at high concentration tends to withdraw the chloride ions on the surface into the solution. Hence, co-adsorption of cations and chloride ions is possible as in model II, on increasing the concentration of inhibitors. The degree of desorption of chloride ions from the surface depends on the degree of adsorption of R+ which is a function of the concentration of EDA and DETA. When the concentration of these inhibitors are increased, the chloride ions on the surface provide a better electrostatic condition, which promotes a direct adsorption of cations on the surface through its polar group, as seen in model III.

Fig. 10.Suggested inhibition models.

## Theoretical Calculations

The optimized inhibitors molecules structures are shown in Fig. 11. Frontier orbital theory is useful in predicting adsorption centers of the inhibitor molecules responsible for the interaction with surface metal atoms. Terms involving the frontier MO could provide dominative contribution, because of the inverse dependence of stabilization energy on orbital energy difference. It has been reported in the literature that the higher the HOMO energy of the inhibitor, the greater the trend of offering electrons to unoccupied d orbital of the metal, and the higher the corrosion inhibition efficiency. In addition, the lower the LUMO energy, the easier the acceptance of electrons from metal surface, as the LUMO-HOMO energy gap decreased and the efficiency of inhibitor improved.33 Quantum chemical parameters listed in Table 5 reveal that EDA has higher HOMO with higher energy gap than DETA thus EDA exhibit more corrosion inhibition than DETA. In order to give further insight into the experimental results, ionization potentials are computed and the Fukui indices are used for predicting the preferential sites of electrophilic attack on both EDA and DETA. It is known that the Fukui indices were widely used as descriptors of site selectivity for the soft-soft reactions.34 According to Li-Evans,35 the favorite reactive site is that which possesses a high value of Fukui indices, thus we have calculated the electrophilic Fukui indices fk− defined by Eq. 2, for heteroatoms in systems. The results are given in Table 6. It turns out from the tabulated values that the nitrogen atoms (N1 and N2) in DETA have small values of electrophilic Fukui indices, less than 0.08. Thus, the N1 and N2 atoms for EDA and N4 atom for DETA are more reactive for electrophilic attack. The addition of nitrogen atom in DETA does affect the Fukui indices in N1 atom by reducing its value to more than a half, however, N4 keep its value after the addition of nitrogen atom. These results seem to indicate that the N4 in both molecules, which has a great nucleophilic character, is involved in the chemical reactivity of these molecules with the metal surface.

Fig. 11.The frontier molecule orbital density distributions of EDA and DETA.

Table 5.Molecular properties of EDA and DETA calculated with DMol in Material Studio 5.5

Table 6.Fukui Indices for EDA and DETA calculated with DMol3 in Material Studio 5.5

# CONCLUSION

The corrosion rate of Cu-Ni alloy in 1.5 M HCl acid solution, increased with increase in temperature, and decreased with increase in inhibitors concentration. The values of activation parameters from Arrhenius equation and transition state equation in inhibited acid solution are significantly influenced by inhibitor concentration. The two suggested mathematical models were suitable to represent the corrosion rate data. Nonlinear regression analysis shows that the first model was better than the second model with high correlation coefficient. Reactive sites for nucleophilic and electrophilic attacks were indicated using the Fukui functions and located on the nitrogen atoms for both inhibitors. Results showed that the N4 in both molecules (EDA and DETA) involved in the chemical reactivity of these molecules with the metal surface.

#### Acknowledgement

Supported by : Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

#### References

1. Fonsati, M.; Zucchi, F.; Trabanelli, G. Electrochim. Acta 1998, 44, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00170-4
2. Hosseini, M.; Mertens, S.F.L.; Ghorbani, M.; Arshadi, M. R. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 78, 800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00390-5
3. Queiroz Baddini, A. L.; de, Cardoso, S. P.; Hollauer, E., Cunha Ponciano Gomes, J. A. da Electrochim. Acta 2007, 53, 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.06.050
4. Chetouani, A.; Daoudi, M.; Hammouti, B.; Ben Hadda, T.; Benkaddour, M. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 2987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.10.011
5. Tebbji, K.; Bouabdellah, I.; Aouniti, A.; Hammouti, B.; Oudda, H.; Benkaddour, M.; Ramdani, A. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.063
6. Khalid, K. F. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40, 601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-0035-8
7. Benali, O.; Larabi, L.; Mekelleche, S. M.; Harek, Y. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 7064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0942-6
8. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S.; Kadum, A. H.; Al Taie, A. S.; Musa, A. Y. American Journal of Applied Sciences 2009, 6, 1403. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.1403.1409
9. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S. Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces Journal 2011, 47, 662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205111050078
10. El-Anadouli, B. E.; Ateya, B. G.; El-Nizamy, F. M. Corro. Sci. 1986, 26, 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(86)90137-X
11. Larabi, L.; Benali, O.; Mekelleche, S. M.; Harek, Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.013
12. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S.; Kadum, A. A. H. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2010, 41, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2009.08.001
13. Noor, E. A.; Al-Moubaraki, A. H. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 110, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.01.028
14. Khadom, A. A.; Musa, A. Y.; Kadhum, A. H.; Abu Bakar Mohamad; Mohd Sobri Takriff Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta 2010, 28, 221. https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.201004221
15. Yaro, A. S.; Khadom, A. A.; Ibraheem, H. F. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials 2011, 58, 116. https://doi.org/10.1108/00035591111130497
16. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S.; Kadhum, A. H. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2010, 55, 150.
17. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S.; Al Taie, A. S.; Kadum, A. A. H. Portugalia Electrochemica Acta 2009, 27, 699. https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.200906699
18. Umoren, S. A.; Ebenso, E. E. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 106, 387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.06.018
19. Umoren, S. A.; Obot, I. B.; Ebenso, E. E. E-journal of Chemistry 2008, 5, 355. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/138407
20. El-Awady, A. A.; Abd-El-Nabey, B. A.; Aziz, S. G. J. Electochem. Soc. 1992, 139, 2.
21. Mall, I. D.; Srivastava, V. C.; Agarwal, N. K.; Mishra, I. M. Colloids Surf., A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 264, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.03.027
22. Noor, E. A. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9826-1
23. Ali Doner; Ramazan Solmaz; Muzaffer Ozcan; Gulfeza Kardas Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.05.027
24. Shams E1 Din, A. M.; E1 Dahshan, M. E.; Taj El Din, A. M. Desalination 2000, 130, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00077-1
25. Tromans, D.; Silva, J. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143, 458. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1836465
26. Zhang, D. Q.; Gao, L. X.; Zhou, G. D. Corros. Sci. 2004, 46, 3031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.04.012
27. Stupnisek-Lisac, E.; Brnada, A.; Mance, A. D. Corros. Sci. 2000, 42, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00065-7
28. Sherif, E. M.; Park, S. M. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 6556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.04.047
29. Ma, H.; Chen, S.; Niu, L.; Zhao, S.; Li, S.; Li, D. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2002, 32, 65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014242112512
30. Kear, G.; Barker, B. D.; Walsh, F. C. Corros. Sci. 2004, 46, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00257-3
31. Khadom, A. A.; Yaro, A. S. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2011, 85, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024411110148
32. E.E. Ebenso Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 79, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00446-7
33. Musa, A. Y.; Kadhum A. A. H.; Mohamad, A. B.; Rahoma, A. A.; Mesmari, H. J. Mol. Struct. 2010, 969, 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.02.051
34. Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2002, 3, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/i3040276
35. Li, Y.; Evans, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7756. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00134a021

#### Cited by

1. Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculations of the Cu–In–Ni phase diagram vol.617, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.140
2. Electrodeposition and characterization of Ni–Cu alloys vol.240, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.12.014