# Preparation of Fe3O4/SiO2 Core/Shell Nanoparticles with Ultrathin Silica Layer

• Jang, Eue-Soon (Department of Applied Chemistry, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
• Accepted : 2012.05.11
• Published : 2012.08.20
• 129 29

#### Abstract

We successfully synthesized $Fe_3O_4/SiO_2$ nanoparticles with ultrathin silica layer of $1.0{\pm}0.5$ nm that was fine controlled by changing concentration of $Fe_3O_4$. Among various reaction conditions for silica coating, increasing concentration of $Fe_3O_4$ was more effective approach to decrease silica thickness compared to water-to-surfactant ratio control. Moreover, we found that concentration of the 1-octanol is also important factor to produce the homogeneous $Fe_3O_4/SiO_2$ nanoparticles. The present approach could be available to apply on preparation of other core/shell nanoparticles with ultrathin silica layer.

#### Keywords

Reverse microemulsion procedure;$Fe_3O_4/SiO_2$ nanoparticles;Silica thickness;Water-to-surfactant ratio;$Fe_3O_4$ concentration

# INTRODUCTION

Thanks to their high magnetic response and biocompatibility, iron oxide (Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles have received significant interest for biomedical applications in the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases.1-3 Therefore, various procedures, such as coprecipitation,4 sol-gel,5 and polyol methods,6 have been developed to prepare monodispersed Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Among the methods developed, the use of an organic solvent with a high boiling temperature, like 1-octadecene (b.p.=315 ℃), has been preferred for achieving higher crystallinity and magnetic properties over those achieved by coprecipitation processes based on aqueous media.7-9 However, the hydrophobic surface of the resulting Fe3O4 should be modified to produce water-dispersible nanoparticles for further biomedical applications. While various methods have been reported thus far, the many advantages of silica listed below make it one of the most appropriate materials for modifying Fe3O4.10-12

(1) It is biocompatible and stable in biological environments;

(2) It reduces the chemical toxicity of the core nanoparticles (e.g., by suppressing the release of toxic Fe2+ ions from Fe3O4); and

(3) It guarantees the chemical and physical properties of the core nanoparticles by protecting them from the external environment.

Moreover, well-known silane chemistry allows us to prepare Fe3O4/SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles with various reaction active sites, with functional groups such as amines, carboxylates, and thiols, through silane coupling reactions and we can thus easily synthesize multifunctional nanoparticles.13 Consequently, various silica-based core/shell nanostructures with multimodality have been investigated for molecular imaging and nanomedicine applications. 1,10-13 The Stöber method is the most commonly used procedure for obtaining silica-coated nanoparticles due to its simplicity in using hydrophilic ethanol solvent.1,14 However, achieving thickness control below 50 nm by this method is difficult and thus the particle sizes of the core/shell nanoparticles increase up to the submicrometer scale.15,16 Such large particles could lead to serious problems in renal clearance and cytotoxicity due to the long blood circulation time and their extensive accumulation into the liver, spleen, and lungs.17,18 Moreover, the extent of magnetic interactions between the core Fe3O4 nanoparticles and an external magnetic field could be reduced by the increased thickness of the SiO2 layer due to the intrinsically diamagnetic property of the silica material. In fact, we have previously found that the 1/T(2) relaxivity of the core Fe3O4 is significantly reduced by an increase in the silica thickness.19 Therefore, technology with a thin layer of silica coating is very important for the biomedical application of silica-based core/shell nanoparticles. A reverse microemulsion procedure satisfies the purpose of preparing thin silica layer-coated Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles.20,21

In this study, we demonstrate the optimal conditions for a reverse microemulsion procedure for the preparation of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with an ultrathin silica layer that can be controlled to a thickness of 1.0 nm. Such an ultrathin silica layer is a notable result because the average thickness of silica layers previously prepared by reverse microemulsion has been reported as 10-70 nm.20-23 Moreover, we find that the SiO2 thickness control mechanism is different from that for pure silica nanoparticles.

# EXPERIMENTAL

Oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (13±2.5 nm in diameter) were provided by Ocean Nanotech LLC. The concentration of the supplied Fe3O4 nanoparticles was determined by inductively coupled plasma analysis as being 22.9 Fe mg/mL. Silica coating of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles was accomplished by a modified reverse microemulsion procedure. In a typical synthesis, 5-300 μL of bare Fe3O4 nanoparticles were suspended in 29.2 mL of cyclohexane (Aldrich) under mild stirring conditions and then 50-100 mM Triton-X100 (Aldrich) and 29.4-88.3 μM NH4OH (29.3 wt%, Aldrich) were added to the solution. The clear dark brown solution changed to being a turbid solution by the addition of NH4OH. The stable reverse microemulsion was generated by adding 0.04-0.22 M 1-octanol such that the resulting solution became optically transparent. Addition of 165 mM tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) to the solution resulted in the immediate hydrolysis of the TEOS. Then, the growing of the silica layer (through condensation reaction) was continued by vigorous stirring (600 rpm) for 72 h at room temperature. The reaction was terminated by adding acetone solvent before the excess organic residents were removed through centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. The precipitated Fe3O4/SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles were redispersed into ethanol solvent by sonication.

# RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

As a template for the hydrolysis and condensation reaction of TEOS, the stable formation of reverse microemulsions plays a central role in the silica coating of the core nanoparticles that could be achieved by additional surfactants and NH4OH. In the present study, we used Triton-X100 (TX 100) as the main surfactant and 1-octanol as a helper surfactant. In addition, formation of the reverse microemulsion could be completed by NH4OH as the supplier of both the reactant (H2O) and catalyst (NH3) for the hydrolysis of TEOS. The effects of such reactants on the formation of pure silica nanoparticles without core materials has been well established by Arriagada and Osseo-Asare.24,25 More particularly, they showed that the particle size of the silica nanoparticles was sensitive to changes in the water-to-surfactant molar ratio (W/S). They considered only the surfactant associated with the reverse micelles formation, without the freely dispersed surfactant in the organic solvent. In contrast, we have used a simplified W/S molar ratio that includes the total concentration of the surfactant, such as in the following expression.

Although the definition of [surfactant] in the present W/S ratio is different from that reported previously, any discrepancy between the two different W/S ratios is negligible because the concentration of the free TX-100 surfactant in the oil phase is constant at the given temperature and solvent. We added no additional deionized water; therefore, the quantity of H2O was controlled by the concentration of NH4OH, i.e., we considered that 70.7 wt% of the added 29.3 wt% [NH4OH] was [H2O].

Most previous reports have investigated the influence of [TX-100] on the formation of the silica nanoparticles, but studies on helper surfactants like 1-octanol have only rarely been reported upon thus far.24-27 As shown in Fig. 1(a), the bare Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a uniform size of 13 nm. Figs. 1(b)-(f) show the changes in the silica layer upon variation of [1-octanol], but the W/S ratio, [Fe3O4], and [TEOS] were fixed at 3, 16.9 μM, and 16.4 mM, respectively. When [1-octanol] was altered to 0.22, 0.13, and 0.04 M, we observed a slight decrease in the average size of the Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticle products, from 121.3 nm to 101.5 nm, as shown in Figs. 1(b)-(d). Therefore, the distribution of the silica layer thickness was 54.2±12.0 nm, 43.5±12.8 nm, 42.3±10.8 nm, respectively. However, Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles of heterogeneous size were obtained from the reaction conditions of 0.03 M 1-octanol, as shown in Fig. 1(e). From the magnified image in Fig. 1(f), we found that small particles have a silica layer thickness of 4.7±1.5 nm. However, the solution for 0.03 M 1-octanol was turbid compared to the optically transparent solutions obtained by the other reaction conditions. This indicates that the [1-octanol] is important for forming a homogeneous silica layer but that a [1-octanol] above a certain concentration does not have a serious effect on the silica thickness. From the above results, we found that the minimum [1-octanol] is approximately 0.04 M in the present study. Therefore, the concentration of 1-octanol was fixed at 0.04 M for the remaining experiments.

According to Osseo-Asare and Arriagada, the silica particle size decreases and the size distribution narrows when the W/S ratio is increased from 0.7 to 2.3.24,25 To test whether a silica layer coated onto Fe3O4 nanoparticles shows a similar tendency, we investigated the effect of the W/S ratio on the thickness of the silica layer and particle size distribution. Figs. 2(a)-(d) show the variation in the silica layer upon a decreasing W/S ratio (from 3 to 0.5) but with a maintained [Fe3O4], [TEOS], and [1-octanol] at 33.9 μM, 165.0 mM, and 40.0 mM, respectively. When the W/S ratio was decreased from 3 to 2, the particle size distribution and silica layer thickness were reduced to 38.6±9.2 nm to 32.8±4.5 nm, as shown in Figs. 2(a) and (b). This is consistent with results previously reported.24, 25 However, the size distribution of the Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles for the W/S ratio of 1 broadened due to the cogeneration of large (148.6±12.5 nm) and small (66.9±20.4 nm) Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles, as shown in Fig. 2(c). When the W/S ratio was decreased to 0.5, we observed the amorphous silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles shown in Fig. 2(d). This result implies that the tendency for silica formation on the core nanoparticles is different from that for pure silica nanoparticles without the core materials.24,25,27

Fig. 1.TEM images of (a) bare Fe3O4 and (b-f) Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles obtained from reactant solutions with different [1-octanol]: (b) 0.22 M, (c) 0.13 M, (d) 0.04 M, and (e and f) 0.03 M.

Fig. 2.TEM images of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles obtained from reactant solutions with different W/S ratios of (a) 3, (b) 2, (c) 1, and (d) 0.5.

From the above results, we determined that a [1-octanol] and W/S ratio of 0.04 M and 2, respectively, produce Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with a homogeneous particle size. However, further optimization of the conditions was required to prepare Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with a silica layer of thinner thickness. As the next step, we investigated the variation of the silica layer thickness upon changes in [Fe3O4] to prepare ultrathin layered Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles. As shown in Figs. 3(a)-(e), we found that the silica layer thickness dramatically decreased from 41.0±7.3 to 1.0±0.5 nm upon an increase in [Fe3O4] from 16.9 μM to 1.02 mM. The most significant change in the silica layer thickness was observed by increasing [Fe3O4] from 101.6 μM to 169.4 μM, as summarized in Fig. 4. From the above results, we believe that increasing [Fe3O4] is a more effective approach to reduce the silica thickness than is controlling the W/S ratio. Scheme 1 demonstrates the reason behind the variation in the silica thickness upon changes in [Fe3O4]. When [Fe3O4] is increased, the (W/S)/[Fe3O4] ratio is decreased at a constant W/S ratio. This fact indicates that relatively low concentrations of H2O and surfactants could lead to the formation of a sparse reverse microemulsion due to the insufficient amount of surfactant. The sparse reverse microemulsion template in the oil phase is relatively non-flexible compared to the dense reverse microemulsion created as a result of the high (W/S)/[Fe3O4] ratio, resulting in shrinkage of the reverse microemulsion. Therefore, the sparse reverse microemulsion only allows a small space for silica layer formation via hydrolysis and condensation reaction of TEOS. For the large (W/S)/[Fe3O4] ratio, the dense reverse microemulsion template is more flexible and thus swelling templates could provide sufficient space for the formation of a large silica layer. Among the two surfactants, the [1-octanol] could have more effect on the flexibility of the templates than TX-100 because the linear hydrocarbon chain of 1-octanol is more flexible than the rigid phenol group in TX-100. This therefore leads to an understanding of why mixtures of large and small Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles could be generated from 1-octanol concentrations below 0.04 M, as described above.

Fig. 3.TEM images of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles obtained with different [Fe3O4]: (a) 16.9 mM, (b) 33.9 mM, (c) 101.6 mM, (d) 169.4 mM, (e) 338.7 mM, and (f) 1016.2 mM.

Fig. 4.Variation of silica layer thickness and distribution upon changing [Fe3O4].

Scheme 1.Schematic representation of the formation of different reverse microemulsion templates at high and low concentrations of Fe3O4.

Fig. 5.ζ potential results of Fe3O4/SiO2 (F/S) nanoparticles with different silica thicknesses. The numbers 95, 79, 30, and 15 indicate the average particle size determined from TEM observations.

On the other hand, a thick silica layer coating leads to an increase in the strongly negative surface charge on the Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles through deprotonation of the silanol group (-SiOH).28, 29 In fact, general products of silica possess negative charges over the pH range of most natural waters.29 Therefore, such a negative surface charge will be enhanced by an increase in the silica thickness, which could lead to severe aggregation via strong electrostatic interactions between nanoparticles. Fig. 5 shows the ζ potential results for the surface charge of the Fe3O4/SiO2 dispersed into the deionized water, which systematically changed from -73.71 to -45.03 mV by decreasing the silica thickness from 41.0±7.3 nm to 1.0±0.5 nm. For the Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with the thick silica layer, problems related to colloidal stability could be induced by increasing the negative surface charge and particle size. In fact, even the prepared Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with a diameter of 95 and 79 nm precipitate out after only a few hours in water, but the Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with the ultrathin silica layer of 1.0±0.5 nm were monodispersed in solvent for a few weeks without any aggregate formation.

# CONCLUSION

The silica thickness control reported in previous works was primarily achieved by changing the W/S ratio. As a result of this, the average silica thickness of the resulting core/shell nanoparticles were reported as 10-70 nm.20-23 In the present study, we successfully synthesized Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with a silica thickness of 1.0±0.5 nm from 1.02 mM Fe3O4. In addition, we found that increasing [Fe3O4] is a more effective approach to reduce the silica thickness than is controlling the W/S ratio. Moreover, the concentration of 1-octanol is also an important factor for producing homogeneous Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles. We believe that a thin layer of silica coating is preferred for biomedical applications of these magnetic nanoparticles. The procedure reported herein could also be applied to the preparation of other core/shell nanoparticles with an ultrathin silica layer.

#### Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)

#### References

1. Cho, Y.-S.; Yoon, T.-J.; Jang, E.-S.; Hong, K. S.; Lee, S. Y.; Kim, O. R.; Park, C.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yi, G.-C.; Chang, K. Cancer Lett. 2010, 299, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2010.08.004
2. Green, J. J.; Zhou, B. Y.; Mitalipova, M. M.; Beard, C.; Langer, R.; Jaenisch, R.; Anderson, D. G. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3126. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8012665
3. Lee, J.-H.; Jang, J.-T.; Choi, J.-S.; Moon, S. H.; Noh, S.- H.; Kim, J.-W.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, I.-S.; Park, K. I.; Cheon, J. Nature Nanotech. 2011, 6, 418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.95
4. Jolivet, J. P.; Chaneac, C.; Tronc, E. Chem. Commun. 2004, 5, 481.
5. Xu, J.; Yang, H.; Fu, W.; Du, K.; Sui, Y.; Chen, J.; Zeng, Y.; Li, M.; Zou, G.; J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 309, 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.037
6. Cai, W.; Wan, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 305, 366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.023
7. Sun, S.; Zeng, H.; Robinson, D. B.; Raoux, S.; Rice, P. M.; Wang, S. X.; Li, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 273. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0380852
8. Bao, N.; Shen, L.; Wang, Y.; Padhan, P.; Gupta, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12374. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja074458d
9. Park, J.; Joo, J.; Kwon, S.; Jang, Y.; Hyeon, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4630. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603148
10. Jun, B.-H.; Noh, M. S.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Kang, H.; Kim, M.-S.; Seo, Y.-T.; Baek, J.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.-K.; Hyeon, T.; Cho, M.-H.; Jeong, D. H.; Lee, Y.-S. Small 2010, 6, 119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901459
11. Lee, J.-H.; Jun, Y.-W.; Yeon, S.-I.; Shin, J.-S.; Cheon, J.; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8160. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603052
12. Zhang, Y.; Pan, S.; Teng, X.; Luo, Y.; Li, G.; J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 9623.
13. Louie, A. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3146. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9003538
14. Stober, W.; Fink, A.; Bohn, E. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 1968, 26, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5
15. Kobayashi, Y.; Katakami, H.; Mine, E.; Nagao, D.; Konno, M.; Marzan, L. M. L. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 2005, 283, 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.184
16. Rossi, L. M.; Shi, L.; Quina, F. H.; Rosenzweig, Z. Langmuir 2005, 21, 4277. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0504098
17. Choi, H. S.; Liu, W.; Misra, P.; Tanaka, E.; Zimmer, J. P.; Ipe, B. I.; Bawendi, M. G.; Frangioni, J. V. Nature Biotech. 2007, 25, 1165. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1340
18. Huang, J.; Bu, L.; Xie, J.; Chen, K.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, X. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7151. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101643u
19. Cha, E. J.; Jang, E.-S.; Sun, I. C.; Lee, I. J.; Ko, J. H.; Kim, Y. I. J. Controlled Release 2011, 155, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.019
20. Han, Y.; Jang, J.; Lee, S. S.; Ying, J. Y. Langmuir 2008, 24, 5842. https://doi.org/10.1021/la703440p
21. Yi, D. K.; Lee, S. S.; Papaefthymiou, G. C.; Ying, J. Y. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 614. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0512979
22. Kool, R.; Schooneveld, N. M.; Hilhort, J.; Donegá, C. M.; Hart, D. C.; Balaaderen, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D.; Meijerink, A. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 2503. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm703348y
23. Kim, J.; Kim, H. S.; Lee, N.; Kim, T.; Kim, H.; Yu, T.; Song, I. C.; Moon, W. K.; Hyeon, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8438. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200802469
24. O.-Asare, K.; Arriagada, F. J. Colloids & Surf. 1990, 50, 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(90)80273-7
25. Arriagada, F. J.; O.-Asare, K. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 1999, 211, 210. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5985
26. Chang, C.-L.; Fogler, H. S. Langmuir 1997, 13, 3295. https://doi.org/10.1021/la961062z
27. Li, T.; Moon, J.; Morrone, A. A.; Mecholsky, J. J.; Talham, D. R.; Adair, H. Langmuir 1999, 15, 4328. https://doi.org/10.1021/la970801o
28. Bagwe, R. P.; Hilliard, L. R.; Tan, W. Langmuir 2006, 22, 4357. https://doi.org/10.1021/la052797j
29. Dove, P. M.; Craven, C. M.; Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 4963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.05.006

#### Cited by

1. Synthesis methods to prepare single- and multi-core iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications vol.44, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4DT03013C
2. Role of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone for preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2 controlled the shell thickness vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3813-y
3. A facile bi-phase synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles with tunable film thicknesses vol.4, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra47043a
4. Silica-based nanocomposites via reverse microemulsions: classifications, preparations, and applications vol.6, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr06025j
5. Critical Enhancement of Photothermal Effect by Integrated Nanocomposites of Gold Nanorods and Iron Oxide on Graphene Oxide vol.34, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.9.2795
6. Magnetic mesoporous silica for water remediation: Synthesis, characterization and application as adsorbent of molecules and ions of environmental concern vol.230, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.04.032
7. A Comparative Investigation on the Structural, Optical and Electrical Properties of SiO2–Fe3O4 Core–Shell Nanostructures with Their Single Components vol.28, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-015-0328-3