Analysis of Siloxane Adsorption Characteristics Using Response Surface Methodology

Park, Jin-Kyu;Lee, Gyeung-Mi;Lee, Chae-Young;Hur, Kwang-Beom;Lee, Nam-Hoon

  • Received : 2012.03.07
  • Accepted : 2012.05.23
  • Published : 2012.06.30


A central composite design and response surface methodology were applied to investigate the optimum conditions for maximum adsorption capacity in activated alumina as an adsorbent. The optimized conditions were determined for adsorption capacity using variables of flow rate and temperature. It was found that flow rate and temperature greatly influenced the adsorption capacity, as determined by analysis of variance analysis of these variables. Statistical checks indicated that second order polynomial equations were adequate for representing the experimental values. The optimum conditions for adsorption capacity were $0^{\circ}C$ and 2,718 mL/min, with the estimated maximum adsorption capacity of 17.82%. The experimental adsorption capacity was 17.75% under these optimum conditions, which was in agreement with the predicted value of 17.82%.


Adsorption capacity;Biogas;Response surface methodology;Siloxane


  1. Münster M, Lund H. Comparing waste-to-energy technologies by applying energy system analysis. Waste Manag. 2010;30:1251-1263.
  2. Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:5478-5484.
  3. Arnold M, Kajolinna T. Development of on-line measurement techniques for siloxanes and other trace compounds in biogas. Waste Manag. 2010;30:1011-1017.
  4. Ohannessian A, Desjardin V, Chatain V, Germain P. Volatile organic silicon compounds: the most undesirable contaminants in biogases. Water Sci. Technol. 2008;58:1775-1781.
  5. Dewil R, Appels L, Baeyens J, Buczynska A, Van Vaeck L. The analysis of volatile siloxanes in waste activated sludge. Talanta 2007;74:14-19.
  6. Ajhar M, Travesset M, Yüce S, Melin T. Siloxane removal from landfill and digester gas - a technology overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:2913-2923.
  7. Matsui T, Imamura S. Removal of siloxane from digestion gas of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101 Suppl 1:S29- 32.
  8. Schweigkofler M, Niessner R. Removal of siloxanes in biogases. J. Hazard. Mater. 2001;83:183-196.
  9. Hong C, Haiyun W. Optimization of volatile fatty acid production with co-substrate of food wastes and dewatered excess sludge using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:5487-5493.
  10. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
  11. Molinuevo-Salces B, García-Gonzalez MC, Gonzalez-Fernandez C, Cuetos MJ, Moran A, Gomez X. Anaerobic co-digestion of livestock wastes with vegetable processing wastes: a statistical analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:9479-9485.
  12. Trinh TK, Kang LS. Application of response surface method as an experimental design to optimize coagulation tests. Environ. Eng. Res. 2010;15:63-70.
  13. Ricaurte Ortega D, Subrenat A. Siloxane treatment by adsorption into porous materials. Environ. Technol. 2009;30:1073- 1083.
  14. Kim JS, Kim MC, Kang EJ, Kim MS. $H_{2}S$ adsorption characteristics of $KIO_{3}$ impregnated activated carbon. J. Korean Oil Chem. Soc. 2002;20:72-79.
  15. An SW, Yoo JY, Choi JY, Park JW. Adsorption characterization of Cd by activated carbon containing hydroxyapatite using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Korean Soc. Water Qual. 2009;25:943-950.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Pre-aeration on the Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge vol.19, pp.1, 2014,
  2. The Viability of Photocatalysis for Air Purification vol.20, pp.1, 2015,